>Removed by (((mod)))
Removed by (((mod)))
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
He's right though. The way the amendment was written and it's original meaning would directly imply that the citizen militia (any fighting aged male) is supposed to be able to get the same weapons that a soldier in the army might be equipped with.
how do you know what they inagined? they probably imagined even more powerful wonderweapons than we currently have. they would probably be disappointed with the pathetic progress we've made in 200 years
>no model of car should be illegal on the street because you can drive
There's no conceivable way that the 18th century founders imagined modern firearm technology.
leftists cannot live with the idea of a well armed populace who might, you know, DO something in their own interest
m.youtube.com
I'm a low testosterone limp wristed faggot Democrat so I definitely know what the Founders knew, could fathom, and would want. They were not living through constant innovation and were convinced that musket rifles were the end of the road for firearms and were not constantly seeking an edge in combat and tactics as humans have done through all of history. So just turn over you're already severally impeded weapons supplies, bigot.
>how do you know what they inagined?
It doesn't matter what they imagined or not.
They never wrote down any of those predictions, so according to the law, it doesn't exist on record.
Anyway, the US founders specifically designed the constitution to be editable because of situations like this. The 2nd amendment is not written in stone.
leftists are fully aware that they are useless eaters who produce nothing and rely on government to steal from the productive class and give to them. leftists dislike an armed productive class for this reason, because they're aware their lives depend on it.
GTFO KIKE GLOWNIGGER
>The 2nd amendment is not written in stone.
it's gonna be updated and revised to be written in blood you kike commie faggot nigger.
get'em while you can....
summer of love coming.......
We have this thing called the Federalist Papers and it says right here in #29:
>If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist.
>OP of deleted pic did nothing wrong
How can we meme this
I want a tank.
You’re pretty stupid for a kike, or you’re just being disingenuous
A cannon will literally leave you with a foot long cartoon-esque hole in the middle of your body... They also knew cannons were the difference between Constantinople being taken by the Turks or not.
At the time the US government was literally using peoples private warships and pirate ships to fight the war
This. Also commie nigger needs to read more writings by founders. They literally salivated over repeating arms and rapidly deployable civilian owned arms that can be used to crush an oppressive regime.... For fucks sake these are the men who lives through the fucking revolutionary war. A good portion of them were goddamn inventors even. To pretend they didn't have a concept of arms, armament, and technological progression is retarded. To ignore the volumes of documents written by the founding fathers that detail these facets of their personalities is ignorant, and to fuck about with the population and it's ability to defend itself is a crime that shall be punishable by death. I hate faggot liberal commie fucking cunts and the ignorant hand waving bullshit they do to suck the systems fucking dick every time they express some idea the kikes up top implanted in their stupid fucking heads so much it is unreal.
>retarded post
>anarchist flag
many such cases
Unban test
if we're going based off what they had, I'd also like an automatic rifle (puckle gun), a cannon, and my own private warship. thanks
what's a difference? have some seen some of those hand carved highly decorated muskets? in the end both top and bottom photos are identical with cannon propelling projectile.
They're both weapons of war.
colonial era muskets were also designed specifically for war you numbnuts faceblog reposter
technically they actually weren't
You fucking kike. Look up who Joseph Belton was, his correspondence with Congress, and how the founding fathers were intrigued by Belton's idea. Not only could they have imagined it, but if not for the exorbitant price of Belton's repeating muskets, the continental army would have been deployed with 16 shot repeating muskets. You are a faggoty ignorant retard. Our technology is not from fucking star trek you dumb cunt. Your smart phone is a fucking radio with a touch screen and a rudimentary processor in it. Our "biggest invention" of today is a primitive piece of shit that you've let yourself be convinced is unimaginable tech. Go jump off a fucking cliff you retard.
Yes, and they were also slave owners who wanted the 2nd amendment to keep down any potential slave uprisings and were willingly to go the extra mile to protect their newly acquired stolen land.
The USA fought a big civil war over that fuck up, remember?
There's plenty of excuses to defend these old bastards. None of it matters because they realized their own imperfections shouldn't guarantee the inevitable destruction of the United States. The founders specifically didn't want kings and immutable doctrines, but they basically obtained it anyway.
We should be allowed nukes. So we can nuke Tel Aviv
talkin about balistic weapons like they nukes or some shit.
Civilians back when the Constitution was written tended to rely on hunting to put food on the table, so they tended to have rifles. This meant that their weapons were usually better than what the military (which tended to go with smoothboores because they were cheaper to produce in large quantities) had.
They also designed it so you would never be subjected to the tyranny of the majority.
You want to change the second amendment? Get 38 states on board. But itll never happen because the only people who dont want guns are faggot liberal city dwellers scared that their feral pet negros will shoot them.
Wrong, watch justice Scalia, he explains the past, the founding fathers made a law soon after the constitution banning cannons for citizens, its a complex issue.
>what is the smoothbore flintlock musket
You’re literally retarded. Gas the kikes
Your right but they allowed battle ships. So you know.
haven't you heard? the Assault Rifle 15 is capable of completely vaporizing its target. it took 14 tries but they got there. pretty sure the 16 will be a micronuke with a built in gopro
1st amendment still applies when idiots like yourself can type stupid shit and 1000s of people see it.......
back then hand written screeds were passed around person to person a few times.......
so yeah fuck off and die you dick sucking faggot
The first cartridge gun was usually sold to hunters. youtube.com
Yeah more fucking hand waving. You are such a fucking faggot. You dodge the point entirely when you are point blank told you are wrong and why, and bring up fucking slavery because- reasons? Fuck yourself you programmed to hell npc bitch. Nobody is going to get a single fucking gun from the population and all your smug hand waving and rhetorical dodging of any points won't save you when the bill comes due.
why bother even
en.wikipedia.org
Not only this but United States vs. Miller holds that because a sawn off shotgun isn't used in a military context, it is not covered by the second amendment and it's banning under the NFA is legal.
The Puckle Gun was a fully automatic grenade launcher that fired nails, musket balls, and whatever the fuck else you shoved in it with the intended design being to clear the deck of an enemy ship by turning the crew into a pile of hamburger. Henry Shrapnel had also already invented exploding cannon balls, who's main function was to shower targets with his namesake and again reduce them to a pile of hamburger.
The founding fathers were well aware we would one day have things like machine guns and assault rifles and rocket launchers and grenades and ect. They were trying to make them even back then. And they were perfectly fine with civilians owning all of them.
The power of modern weaponry is irrelevant to the fact that the Founding Fathers intended for the people to MATCH whatever weapons the military had.
And the moment someone tries to rewrite the 1st or 2nd amendment they'll be rightfully shot.
Show your flag you disingenuous kike, because they did no such thing. It wasnt until about 40 years after every single founder was dead that the government started encroaching on the second amendment with all sorts of bullshit. Then they stopped for a while before starting back up in the 1920s.
After WW2 you could come back with your fighter plane still having the weapons mounted and fly it around without issue. Thats how legally transferrable WW2 aircraft mounted guns are available for sale today.