>physical commodity >only available online or from third world countries. >globally underappreciated. >globally under valued. >there are big interests that would prefer it stay obscure. >we will move the price up x1000 >there is currently ~$500,000 worth available online. >when that is gone, what will it be worth? >Potential market size of $77b
An example of the problem we need to solve. Imagine for a second there are three resources, all used in the same manner for the same industry.
Resource A’s name is: AMAZING™ Resource A’s quality is: 4/10
Resource B’s name is: POOP™ Resource B’s quality is: 2/10
Resource C’s name is: POO™ Resource C’s quality is 9/10
The organisation that controls the monopoly of Resource A has almost total market share with their product AMAZING™. They know full well their product is very low quality. However they market it as high quality.
The organisation knows about Resource C and it’s much much higher quality; however for political reasons they cannot control it. So they will have to find a way to make sure it never finds its way to market to compete with their product.
If the global market-place were to ever learn about about Resource C, the organisation would lose their market dominance & monopoly. For this reason, the organisation brands resource C as POO™ to intentionally confuse and mislead.
Additionally, the organisation releases their own new product, Resource B and markets it as POOP™ a very low quality substitute to resource A. They now control two products. AMAZING™ & POOP™
Everyone knows that POOP™ is a terrible product. So they stick to AMAZING™
Now enter Resource C. The far superior resource. However for decades it has been branded is POO™ so the global market assumes it is the same product as POOP™ due to their similar names; and lack of market recognition.
Resource C / POO™ is scientifically proven to be vastly superior in every way to Resources A & B. However if you were to tell your NPC/normie friends they would not believe you.
“Hey friend you should buy some POO™ it’s so much better than AMAZING™”
“Ha! Foolish man! Everyone knows that POOP™ is just a lower quality version of AMAZING™ go away with your silly ideas”
“No! listen carefully, you have been tricked, POO™ is not the same as POOP™ it is also much better than AMAZING™”
So therein lies our dilemma. Do we rebrand POO™ with a better name? Or do we attempt to convince the masses of the great lie?