Attached: Adolf-Hitler-Paintings.jpg (848x1131, 353.31K)
Why was Hitler's art rejected?
William Rodriguez
Nathan Wood
they didnt like it
Landon Hughes
It's really not that good. The use of perspective is very flawed.
David Cook
stuck in the 19th century
Angel Roberts
kikes wanted something ugly, by that point they had already control over austria and its institutions and the damage had started
Nicholas Barnes
Spot the nonwhite
Wyatt White
kinda funny that even his paintings show his perspective is flawed.
Gabriel Wilson
good enough to be accepted to art school and learn to be better
Ryan Garcia
It's not good for what it was, that is 19th C. Romanticist, and it was not what art schools in the early 20th C. were looking for in students. A youth producing work like that would never be comfortable as a graphic designer, illustrator or other gainfully employed artist at the time.
In arts terms, this is like someone handing over a crumbled Polaroid and claiming it's as good as any Stieglitz or Nick Nixon print.
The perspective problems are only one of the issues that show an actual troubled mind. The complete lack of inhabitation in his work shows some kind of dissociation with humanity, possibly autism or schizoaffective.
>inb4 duh jews
>inb4 muh hero
>t. Bauhaus trained as an undergrad
Joseph Perez
Because drawings of naked children were selling like hot cakes in the streets of Berlin back then.
No, I'm not making this shit up.
Charles Anderson
If I remember correctly, his artwork had this recurring theme where it lacked people. Just scenes of buildings and nature with few if any people at all. Kind of unsettling
Blake Allen
because it's very mediocre even in terms of romantic period, with obvious perspective mistakes
Thomas Martinez
And why should it have people?
Lucas Torres
He couldn't draw people well. At most he could have became a decent greeting card artist if he refined himself a little.
Carter Peterson
It is no requirement but their omission gives some of his works an empty feel. If you contextualize this with who the artist was, Hitler, then it makes the works ominous too
Gavin Morris
because his 'art' is literally a worse form of photography. Theres nothing beautiful about these.
Juan Cooper
shalom
Owen Scott
He didn't paint that. A Jew did.
Levi Reed
wow he was actually very talented. crazy shit.
Joshua Brooks
same reason faggots seethe at Thomas kinkade
David Rivera
This reminds of how every NPC that has read (or pretended to read) our Uncle's book always says, "It's really badly written."
Christian Collins
gesundhiet