Why was Hitler's art rejected?

Attached: Adolf-Hitler-Paintings.jpg (848x1131, 353.31K)

they didnt like it

Attached: merchnooo.jpg (256x256, 11.09K)

It's really not that good. The use of perspective is very flawed.

stuck in the 19th century

kikes wanted something ugly, by that point they had already control over austria and its institutions and the damage had started

Spot the nonwhite

Attached: Adolf_Hitler_Der_Alte_Hof.jpg (1920x1382, 1.04M)

kinda funny that even his paintings show his perspective is flawed.

good enough to be accepted to art school and learn to be better

It's not good for what it was, that is 19th C. Romanticist, and it was not what art schools in the early 20th C. were looking for in students. A youth producing work like that would never be comfortable as a graphic designer, illustrator or other gainfully employed artist at the time.
In arts terms, this is like someone handing over a crumbled Polaroid and claiming it's as good as any Stieglitz or Nick Nixon print.
The perspective problems are only one of the issues that show an actual troubled mind. The complete lack of inhabitation in his work shows some kind of dissociation with humanity, possibly autism or schizoaffective.
>inb4 duh jews
>inb4 muh hero
>t. Bauhaus trained as an undergrad

Because drawings of naked children were selling like hot cakes in the streets of Berlin back then.

No, I'm not making this shit up.

If I remember correctly, his artwork had this recurring theme where it lacked people. Just scenes of buildings and nature with few if any people at all. Kind of unsettling

because it's very mediocre even in terms of romantic period, with obvious perspective mistakes

And why should it have people?

He couldn't draw people well. At most he could have became a decent greeting card artist if he refined himself a little.

Attached: 1597764867428s.jpg (125x93, 1.69K)

It is no requirement but their omission gives some of his works an empty feel. If you contextualize this with who the artist was, Hitler, then it makes the works ominous too

because his 'art' is literally a worse form of photography. Theres nothing beautiful about these.

shalom

He didn't paint that. A Jew did.

wow he was actually very talented. crazy shit.

same reason faggots seethe at Thomas kinkade

This reminds of how every NPC that has read (or pretended to read) our Uncle's book always says, "It's really badly written."

Attached: jew lessons.webm (931x576, 2.1M)

gesundhiet