>conquered, controlled, and occupied iberia for 800 years
>didn't genocide the inhabitants, even though they could have
Conquered, controlled, and occupied iberia for 800 years
Other urls found in this thread:
Killed their spirit and destroyed their souls though.
>they could have
for what purpose?you retarded incel
For what purpose did conquistadors commit genocide on native Americans?
They didn't. They bred with them
you don´t kill jizyapayers, you leech them
They completely wiped out the Aztec civilization, burning all their books.
That's what genocide means.
> equating Islam with Aztecan paganism
Now you are just being silly. Islam will cut the head clean of someone but at least they don’t proceed to eat the organs. Aztec religion legit bred psychopaths and it is objectively a good thing the religion was made to completely conform to Catholicism, though some death worshipping elements remained, nothing to extreme
Who cares, they couldn't have anyway
>dutch flag
>it's a morrocan dunecoon
pottery.
>They completely wiped out the Aztec civilization
Disease ravaged the land, and it was their native allies that most of the killing.
the decisions tab was bugged so they couldnt press the button. shut the fuck up, burger.
>it was genocide but it was a good genocide
Thanks for agreeing.
I'm just saying Muslims should have exterminated the Spanish when they had the chance.
…they weren’t Spanish tho
The muslims that were here were basically the only decent muslims that ever existed, and the most enlightened civilization in the world at that time
Diseases didn't collect all their books to burn them.
It was a genocide.
Modern day historians could have learned a lot about the pre-colonial Americas if we had copies of those books but they're all gone and that was no accident it was a deliberate act to erase history.
> The muslims that were here were basically the only decent muslims that ever existed
I have heard good things about the Ibadi
>exist for centuries
>still being nogs
except they didn't, stop relying on memes for history
I love how you mutts defend shitty brown people on this board while larping as white
these were their ''books''
Also putting aside those Christian’s you are talking about were largely Germanic Visigoths (not Latin Spaniards). Didn’t you basically get your wish of genocide in regards to Christians via the Turks? Armenians, Assyrians, Greeks. That’s Miaphysite, Nestorian, and Orthodox, aside from Catholics that’s all of the apostolic branches that were left traumatized and now extremely vengeful because they couldn’t finish the job in time. Are you just a Jihadi or just hate the Spanish?
Abderramán lll was a good leader and actually cared about his people
the forces which conquered the Aztecs were predominantly other natives who were practically food to them.
>Diseases didn't collect all their books to burn them.
yeah, it was the beforehand mentioned "natives". What is your fucking obsession with cannibal cookbooks?
Literally what the fuck is the entire point of your post other than a one sided slander against Spanish history?
Stop projecting modern day morality (which is European to begin with) onto fucking spear chuckers from 600 years ago.
Just hate the Spanish.
No they couldn't genocide them
> Modern day historians could have learned a lot about the pre-colonial Americas
Catholic priest recorded manuscripts, founding myths, books, took notes of architecture. Everything we do know was recorded by monks. Mayans were even allowed to stick around for a minute because they weren’t fucking insane like the Aztecs.
Maya only gets absorbed in like the early 1700’s
Genocide isn't about burning books you retard. It's about killing all the people. It's GENocide, not Libracide.
lmfao yes they could have
>didn't genocide the inhabitants, even though they could have
No? Sure are a lot of swarthy Spaniards aren't there?
catholics are brown and retarded, they were never Christians
Ablaq; everywhere they wanna be.