But they're not my kids!

American kids are fed enough.

Maybe they should put some of that extra funding for inner city schools to work instead of letting the administrators and school board trannies pocket it all

No.

>but they're kids!
That isn't how the world works

>just give it to them for free, they're kids
Becomes
>if we give kids free stuff we should give old people free stuff
Then
>why do all these old white people get free stuff? Blacks need to get free stuff
Then
>why are blacks the only people of color who get free stuff? ALL people of color should get free stuff
>why is race the only determining factor? The LGBTQ community faces prejudice at every turn and deserves free stuff

"Free stuff" should not exist even as a concept.

Grow your own damn food. Why dou your kids have to be fed by a school?
I had a job before I was In middle school. Fuck your useless spawn. I hope your entire bloodline ends. You are a worthless consoomer. Why are you worth breathing air?

I stole food from the cafeteria when I was a kid. You would literally order your poutine, and then go to pay for the poutine at a separate counter AFTERWARDS... if you were a chump

Feed your own fucking kids. I got my own bills to deal with.

Don't Breed 'em
If you can't feed 'em

logically it's very easy to just stop at 'kids', as they have literally no opportunity to provide for themselves up until they're like 16.

good lad

Most of those 'lunches' are already provided at low-cost due to taxpayer-funded social welfare programs. 5 gets you 10 that the money for lunch was spent on weed, purple drank and scratchies.

These same people pay the minimum amount of taxes required every year while asking why we dont spend more lol

Attached: 1645488801218.jpg (720x624, 110.82K)

i find it hard to believe that schools aren't making a profit when they're charging 3 or 4 dollars for the absolute trash they tend to serve in american schools

>you have to give kids who aren’t yours free food because…… you just do, ok?

>logically it's very easy to stop at kids
Logically it's very easy to stop *before* kids, because they have their parents.

Who pays for stuff for kids? The kids' parents. That's the way the world has always worked, and it makes way more sense than any gay and retarded leftist idea.

I'm anti-natalist. Not my fault these animals decided to have sex and children when they can't afford it

.

Fuck you. Children can have jobs. Parents can quit being useless make work types. Grow your own food and put your kids to work.

Don’t like it? Make your own lunch.

Attached: F21F8080-FB78-442F-9E4D-E3270C0A6B29.jpg (563x334, 19.45K)

FEED THEM
FEED THEM
SPEND YOUR LIFE WORKING TO FEED THOSE WHO DON'T
FEED THE PARASITES
FEED THE RABBITS
FEED THE LEECHES
FEED THE WORMS

It’s ironic because a lot of school systems offer free lunch programs. It just shows that the parents are to lazy to apply for it

Schools don't, contractors do.
I'd pay for *white* kids to not worry about it. Dump the rest in the ocean first and then we'll talk.

Okay please tell me why its bad to give kids food in school. Dont european civilized countries do this?

Can we create a financial product around this "lunch debt" that we can trade on the open market? A lunch debt derivitive?

Attached: 5462322784.jpg (1200x675, 71.62K)

“Work makes you free” type mind set is cringe.

feed your own kids you fucking sociopath

america is built on debt

Then you make it a successful life strategy to just keep having kids that you can't afford to feed.

The public will spend their money to feed these kids, but then will have less money to feed their own kids.
Then the responsible people will have fewer kids, while the irresponsible people parasite off of their efforts.

if a kid has some piece of shit deadbeat parents, I'd much rather my tax dollars go towards making sure they didn't go hungry, rather than funding any part of the federal government or military industrial complex

It's a fraction of the cost to cook compared to having people prepare food and to also pay their employers.

my country gives out free food, I'm sure wealthiest nation in the world can do it.
>I'll work children to death before providing basic necessities to the those who need it
classic brainwashed murican

The majority of the world is fooled by this scam.

If you’re not accumulating middle school lunch debt, the economy isn’t growing

>yet another thread bashing swedes for not feeding guests
this has to be a psyop

yeah that's a good point, sysco or whoever is probably skimming billions off the top by overcharging for their trash foods

Slaving for mister kikeburg like all the other parents that send their children to the indoctrination camps.

All the fucking taxes we pay to schools and they can't even feed the kids they keep locked up there 8 hours a day

>putting kids in debt to receive taxpayer-funded, grade F "food" that costs them pennies to buy
Personal responsibility aside, this is ultra kikeish

>This entire thread
>Swedengate
I kindda understand now.

It doesnt have to be 5 course meal. Just give the kid a sandwich and a juice box. So the kid's stomach isnt guggling while im class. Thats really gonna be a big burden on the taxpayer?

Parents are responsible for feeding their children. No one else is.
It is, in all seriousness, immoral to support someone else's child unless
you plan to take on all of the responsibility for raising that child.
Otherwise you're just enabling child neglect, and often abuse.
Bad parents should be punished rigorously.
>...bad parents?
Yes, as in those who abuse their children.
Those who starve their children.
Those who refuse to clothe and provide for their children.
>punished?
Within the context of this paragraph it's an ironic statement meant to
highlight the absurdity of their point of view that being held responsible
to their duties as parents would be seen by them as a punishment.
It is not a suggestion that they should be abused or exploited by the state.
However, they should openly be shamed by society and their neighbors.
Just as good parents should be celebrated.

Violent criminals, drug addicts, terrorists, etc should be sterilized in a moral society.
However, in this immoral and inverted society, that would result in only the innocent
and worthy being sterilized. This is the same reason why the state cannot be trusted
to take custody of children. As we know, the state sexually, physically, and mentally
abuses children from the lowest levels of CPS agents to the highest levels, such as
the illegitimate, "president".

To live morally within an immoral society means taking personal responsibility. If a child
is neglected and hungry, do you have the means to feed that child? If so, will you abandon
them to their fate and pat yourself on the back after offering them food as though you've
saved them? It's a genuine question, I see no good answer either way. The cause of these
troubles is the corruption of government and its fascist union with corporate and ngo entities.
To solve child abuse and neglect, one must first pull the roots from upon which that sickness
sprouts.

You realize that niggers literally have kids simply for tax and welfare purposes, neglecting them to the extent that the law allows, all so you can hate white people for not helping them do it?

I wonder if the NPCs out there will pick up on the fact that these politician's jobs are to actually just argue about this shit but not actually do anything about it because coming up with new things to argue about is too hard?
Why address this relatively easy issue when you can just shitpost on Twitter about it for all eternity and have something to draw discussion away from complicated issues like election fraud?

I'm 33 and never got a free lunch because I had parents that made it for me. Sometimes I got $2 for pizza Friday.

Abolish public schools.

Attached: 1647491774648.jpg (620x1137, 132.17K)

Parents should feed or pay to feed their own children, what’s the big deal lol. If we just feed everyone all the time, you might as well feed rats.

Money matters more to some. No principles.

who fmthe fuck is that

if you subsidize the worst you proliferate the worst