Why is there literally 0% french people in places like Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky etc anymore?

Why is there literally 0% french people in places like Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky etc anymore?

Attached: file.png (1530x1090, 374.63K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huguenots#North_America
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Jews rape children because the Talmud tells them to

For a long time there was, over time they integrated until all that was left is the place names.

Because they were almost entirely trading outposts with a few hundred men and no women. The few men who stayed took Injun brides and made families but compared to the thousands of English colonists that came over the mountains it was a very tiny drop in a very large pool. Most men who left went to either Quebec or Louisiana.

pretty much this. like 2/3rds of the blue region of the map were fur trappers who lived in small groups and put down trap lines over vast distances

this, the only real permanent french settlements were the ports

>British colonies
1.5 million
>Spanish colonies
Several millions
>French colony
16,000

That's why

They had like 2 cities, drew those lines on a map and called it theirs

The "French" colonial population were all feather niggers.

Are you on drugs? French is like the third largest ethnic group behind British/Irish and German

I lived in Ohio and it was just a ton of irish/scots and germans

There never were except beaver hunters

I am always fascinated by the Metis and wonder how many of them there really are. Are all native Americans in Canada mixed like in Mexico

>Fort
>Fort
>Fort


Why is there no frenchies?

There is see where it doesn't say Fort and is says Quebec, Montreal, Tadoussac

People still speak french there.

Crushing majority of that area was very sparsely populated, like by the time New France as annexed by the British there was something like 40k peoples across this entire landmass, mostly located at occasional trade forts that existed solely so France could claim control over that given area, kind of like how African ''colonization'' was done. Fuck France for disregarding this nation as ''quelques arpens de neige''

They were mostly Huguenots, weren't they? Huguenots were Protestant, so they switched to speaking English in burgerland and intermarrying with the Anglo-elite.

Not really. They either live farther north than most Canadians, or on Vancouver Island which was settled relatively recently.
There's also evidence that the east coast tribes were already a mix of European even before Colombus. Supposedly they have a significant amount of Levantine DNA.

I've also wondered about what they call the Mi’kmaq along the East Coast. They never had their own writing system, and the name is pronounced "Mic Mack". A bit odd, considering Irish/Scottish surnames, eh? I suspect the different spelling is intentional, to muddy such speculation. Supposedly there are words in Algonquin that are similar to ones in Irish, all river and fish related.

Erm, almost all French nobility got the fuck out when the Brits took power because they knew they wouldn't get preferential treatment from them, this aint no secret.

there's some in lousiana
cajuns

Ok nigger we know quit being annoying newfag.

No they didn't, and they weren't allowed in New France, so they went to the English-speaking parts and later blended in. England also sheltered them.
>The Huguenots originally spoke French on their arrival in the American colonies, but after two or three generations, they had switched to English.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huguenots#North_America

...Nigga, I think you're mixing things up, we're talking of New Frances nobility here, and here you go saying they weren't allowed into new france, so you mean to say they came from France originally and went to the usa? And beside a single family couldn't possibly ever grow to become a huge demographic in the USA, I think you're mixing up Louisiana folks whom presence there predate the ownership of the area both by brits and the usa.