More Grim DEATHVAX™ News From One Of The Largest Pharmacy Chains In The USSA

N O R E F U N D S

Attached: 1602595463407.jpg (1080x1080, 154.05K)

It's almost like people who got boosted are more likely to get tested. Almost...

So your telling me the vaccines didn't help prevent infection, spread, hospitalisation, or death?

Funny that.

Nah, people who don't give a shit about the vax don't give a shit about getting tested.

So if you didn’t get tested, you wouldn’t even know that you had the fake hoax virus. Got it. Thanks for the clarification user

But this is a rate.

If boosted people are more likely to get tested, shouldn’t their positivity rate be lower? Presumedly, triple vaxxed people would run to get tests earlier and more often on less convincing symptoms so shouldn’t we see less positivity.

> more likely to get tested.
So deadly you don’t even notice you have it. Got it

I just read a little more about this. Walgreens put out an analysis to make sure we didn’t actually believe what these results imply.

The actual significant differences between the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations appear to be these:
Vaxxies were much more likely to be tested for travel (this should lower the positivity rate)

unvaxxed chads where more likely to have had previous covid infection (this should lower their rate)

Unvaxxed chads were more likely to be testing weekly (presumedly for employment or a similar reason, this should lower the rate)

Unvaxxed chads were more likely to have had close contact with someone who had covid ( you’d think this would raise the rate, but their analysis showed this wasn’t significant).

Finally, and this is what I said in my previous post, unvaxxed chads were far far more likely to be experiencing symptoms like fever, shortness of breath and gastrointestinal symptoms (they didn’t count symptoms of a common cold. This should raise the positivity rate among unvaxxed)

All in all, since many of the covariants they looked at go in opposites directions this analysis did little to counter the obvious conclusion from the data.

No Refunds!

All you California drug addicts should BOOST from Walgreens. Politicians even recommend it.

I'm not a pro-vax shill, but I'd posit that people who've vaxxmaxxed are more likely to get tested at the first sign of symptoms.
Without out number of participants it's somewhat hard to get anything concrete from this data. But that's the way modern stats work.

>but I'd posit that people who've vaxxmaxxed are more likely to get tested at the first sign of symptoms.
That’s seems to be what the analysis I found confirms.

However, wouldn’t that lower the positivity rate for vaxxedmaxxed?

Maybe it has.

Maybe it has indeed. That would mean the vax is even worse than the data implies.

Wouldn’t this obviously be the case since the unvaxxed got natural immunity during the 5 months and the compared to a vax immunity that has worn off after those 5 months

Very related.

It could be, but the data is trash. Or at least that graph with percentages is.
Imagine having real data on covid though.

This is the most retarded provaccine cope ever. The unvaxxed were literaly forced by law to test if they wanted to be accepted in many areas of society.

See my post hereYou are correct, however there are other confounders that push in the other direction. It’s hard to draw firm conclusions from this data, meaning it’s not obvious that what the data implies isn’t true: ie that vaxxies are now more susceptible to the virus.

>more test = more positivity rate
holly shit we got a moron over here

Topkek

That would be insanity. Normal people might be able to come to their own conclusions about the virus. Some of those conclusions might contradict what health officials are telling us. We can’t have that.

You are a slave. No refunds.

So effective...

>Imagine having real data on covid though.
Can't let the public see it as they might misinterpret it