the christains say they are essua the first born right full heirs to the birth right, and then the muslims come along and say no we are ishmarl the real first born the birth right is ours, and the whole time the jews are just content to know that g-d chose them, is the need for the other two abrhamic faiths to proselytize a symptom of insecurity?
The christains say they are essua the first born right full heirs to the birth right...
Ayden Flores
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Hudson Nelson
This comes across like a schizo post.
Please provide at least a little bit of context to your posts.
And don't answer your own questions in your own posts and then use those "answers" to formulate an argument against whoever you're talking at (not to).
Brandon Perez
I fucking hate schizos so much bros.
99% of mentally ill people are fucking low IQ retards.
The only reason why intelligent schizos/psychos are so prevalent in our culture is because they're extremely rare (and often scary). But that doesn't take away from the fact that 99% of pol schizos are retarded fuck sticks who need to die ASAP.
James Hughes
christiains claim to be issacks essua the first born, and muslims claim to be ishmaile abrahams first born, both of these groups think there superior to jews and are fanatical in their attempt to win converts, jews on the other hand are humble not claiming superiority to any one and not going around proselytizing
Juan Morales
Abram/Abraham was a Hebrew (a son of Eber). He was blessed by God to father many nations.
Issac/Israel was the farther of Judah. Judah is the father of all REAL Jews.
Fake Jews (which are in power today) were a mix of sons of Judah and random inhabitants of Judea.
The sons of Ishmael are not Jews and they have not received the blessings of Israel or Judah. Whether they received the Abrahamic blessing is debatable.
Logan Davis
>Fake Jews (which are in power today) were a mix of sons of Judah and random inhabitants of Judea.
whos the schizo now faggot
>Ishmael are not Jews
never said they were I said they claim to be the right full inheritors of g-ds covenant
Easton Diaz
They were not the full inheritors of God's covenant.
It was either split evenly between Issac and Ismael, OR it was passed over Ishmael to Issac only.
Also Jews control central banking across the entire world.
This is not a schizo take. It's just fact.
Anthony Martinez
you cant into reading comprehension can you I am speaking from their perspective what they christains and muslims believe not what is actual I know full well g-d favored jacob, as to who runs banking around the world I suggest you look into opec and watch network
Noah Murphy
It's hard to understand you when you spell half of your words incorrectly and you use zero punctuation.
I'm not an Islamic shitskin, so I really couldn't tell you anything about their perspective, let alone defend it. I don't care much about Semetic religion desu, I just appreciate the history that the Bible documents.
Caleb Watson
You are both retarded.
Abraham had a son named Isaac.
Isaac had two sons, Esau and Jacob
Judah is the son of Jacob, not Isaac.
The Covenant promise given to Israel was given to the seed-line of Jacob who Yahweh renamed Israel.
No one else is part of Israel except this bloodline.
Esau mixed with Canaanites and his heirs are not part of the covenant Promise.
ONLY the seedline of Jacob was the Covenant Promise given to.
Gen 21:12 And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called.
Isacc's seed is Jacob/Isreal
Jesus came ONLY for the seed of Isacc
Levi Miller
"I am speaking the truth in Christ, I am not lying; my conscience bears me witness in the Holy Spirit, that I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my KINSMAN by RACE. They are ISRAELITES, and to them belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of THE LAW, the worship, and THE PROMISES; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their RACE, according to the flesh (genetic progeny), Christ who is God who is over all be blessed for ever. Amen.
But it is not as though the word of God had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his descendants; but "Through Isaac shall your descendants be named." This means that it is not the children of the flesh (genetic progeny) who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are reckoned as DESCENDANTS. For this is what the promise said, "About this time I will return and Sarah shall have a son."
(Romans 9:1-9 JB) Word for word from the Official Catholic Lectionary Bible
The Kinsman (Blood Relatives) by Race that are the PHYSICAL DESCENDANTS of the son of Sarah (Jacob)?
They are the awdawmh (Adamic men) through Jacob's line not the iysh (Non-Adamic men).
Only the children of man (adamnh) can hold the Spirit of Yahweh within. The set apart spirit. The Holy Spirit.
Isaac Martin
>Isaac had two sons, Esau and Jacob
>Judah is the son of Jacob, not Isaac.
i know all this, and here you stroll into my thread full of jealousy and insecurity proveing my point about you edomites needing to proselytize
Joseph Bell
>Judah is the son of Jacob, not Isaac.
oh yeh.
I thought I was missing something kek
James Collins
Piss off, there is no "your" thread
and you said
>Issac/Israel was the farther of Judah. Judah is the father of all REAL Jews.
You are wrong
Caleb Richardson
>and you said
>>Issac/Israel was the farther o
no I did not, I said christains think they deserve the birth right because there from essua and muslims think they deserve the birth right cause there from ishmael
Julian Rivera
>Abram/Abraham was a Hebrew (a son of Eber)
This is wrong as well.
The head Priest of the Temple of Ur in Sumeria who talked daily to King Nimrod (Son of Cush, Grandson of Ham)
was named Terah and he had a son.. Who's name was Abram.
Abram was the great great Grandson of Reu who grew up in Babel during the construction of the tower of Babel.
His son Nahor Lived there as did his father Peleg.
Peleg's father was Eber, the grandson of Noah.
Nathan Carter
>Fake Jews (which are in power today) were a mix of sons of Judah and random inhabitants of Judea.
Wrong as well. Just stop already.
The Kingdom of Judah in 586 BC, was conquered by Babylonia and the Judahites (Isrealites of the Tribe of Judah) were taken away to Babylon. Edomites moved into the now empty Kingdom of Judah at this time. The Babylonian Empire fell to the conquests of Cyrus the Great in 539 BC. The Kingdom of Judah remained under Persian rule until the conquest of Alexander the Great in 332 BC, eventually falling under the rule of the Greek Seleucid Empire. In 164BC Judas Maccabeus, an Isrealite from the tribe of Judah revolted; this resulted in the Judahite Hasmonean dynasty of Judahite Kings who ruled in The Kingdom of Judah for a little over 100 years.
The Kingdom of Judah was only taken back from the Edomites and mixed multitudes by the the Maccabees in 164 BC. During the rule of the Greeks it was full of Edomites from the bordering country of Edom. John Hyracnus, The Israelite King of Judah attacked Edom in order to settle the matter in 150 BC. He won and allowed Edomites to remain in The Kingdom of Judah if they followed the law.
Edom and thier leader Antipater the Edomite and his son Herod the Great from the New Testement, conquered the Kingdom of Judah by killing thier King, High priest and the the Judahite priests in 35 BC. They then added The Kingdom of Judah and Samaria to Edom and renamed it Judea. Notice they did not add Judea, they added The Former Kingdom of JUDAH. Judea is an Edomite country created in 35BC that became a Provence of Rome.
The Edomites of Judea are the Jews.
Edom hasd been at war with Israel for over 400 years. Edom won by deception. Jews are Edom. Yahweh hates Edom forever. Says so right in the Old and New Testaments.
God, Yahweh says he hates Jews forever. (Malachi 1:2-4)
Jews are the literal bloodline of Satan.(John 8:44)
Jews were never Isrealites (John 8:33)
Anthony Howard
Christians are not from Esau you retard.
Christians are the Lost tribes of Israel. The 10 tribes under the leadership of Jeroboam from the Tribe of Ephraim split from the House of David to create the Northern Kingdom of Isreal. They were taken into Assyria in 744 BC and never returned.
Esau is the Father of Caananite tribe of Edom, who over took The Kingdom of Judah in 35 BC.
His tribes is known as Edomites and they are the modern day Jews.
Alexander Cruz
>re the Lost tribes of Israel
these niggers have no relation to israel go fuck yourself
Jeremiah Flores
I thought Caanan came from Ham? Did it really come from Esau (who was a descendant of Shem)??
Ryder Roberts
>the christains say they are essua the first born right full heirs to the birth right
Do they? The only people that seem to care about bloodlines and prophecies more than what Christ actually taught are more jew than Christian.
Cooper Martin
You are right. Judeo-Chritians do not have anything to do with Christens. Thank Rome.
Paul wrote to Celts. Paul was a Celt. So was Thomas and most probably Jesus as well.
Isreal is a bloodline as I posted above
See
Ethan Bennett
this nigger is retarded he used to name fag as the ghost of ian smith if youve been here long enough to remember
if you listen to this putz a+aobzF1 then youd no christians are da real jews
(implied sarcasm)
paule was a pharisee the same people you iraneously call edomites
Jaxon Torres
Cain came from the union of Satan (Sammeal the Angle of Death) and Eve.
Cain started a tribe called the Kenites.
Ham's son Canaan married into the Kenites. Canaan is Noah's grandson.
Esau the grandson of Abraham and son of Isaac married into the Canaanites, that is why he lost his birth-right, not because of a bowl of soup.
Jacob and his mother Rebecca conspired to covet his birthright because as rebecca didn't want Esaus Caananite children to inherit Abrahams blessings. Genisis 27:46 "Then Rebekah said to Isaac, “I’m disgusted with living because of these Hittite women. If Jacob takes a wife from among the women of this land, from Hittite women like these, my life will not be worth living.”
Rebecca is being prudent, Issac the father is being careless. Why did God hate Esau? cause he was a race mixer
Esau tribe, the Edomites ARE the Jews in the New Testament.
Kayden Parker
I have never name fagged on this site in my life, faggot.
Christopher Ross
>paule was a pharisee the same people you iraneously call edomites
Paul was a Celt from Tarsus. He was raised by a Pharisee who was not his father so he became a Pharisee and a traitor to his race. It is actually doubtful that he was a Pharaisee for many reasons.
Paul refers to the Galatians as “brethren” 11 times. While many might assume Paul was simply referring to ‘fellow Christians’ in general, this could not have been the case. He could only have been using it in reference to his fellow kinsman and kinswoman (i.e. people of the same clan or race). There are two good reasons for this.
One, he was from Tarsus, the city next door populated by the same Celts and secondly because the word “brethren” comes from the Greek word “adelphos” which specifically means “brother” in the sense of someone related.
According to the Strong’s Concordance it infers a blood relationship since it’s “a connective particle…(one/same womb); a brother…near or remote…brother.” He was therefore calling the Celts his kinsfolk.
Etymology:
From Proto-Hellenic *əgʷelpʰós, from Proto-Indo-European *sm̥-gʷelbʰ-ó-s (“one/same womb”),
Since Paul says he was “of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews” (Phil 3:5) and refers to the Celts of Galatia as his relatives or clansman, then the Celts must have also be Israelites.
They were White Celts. FACT
Galatians were Celts and they lived in the middle of Turkey where Ankara the Capital is today.
The Galatians were a Gallic speaking Celtic people of the Hellenistic period that dwelt mainly in central Anatolia, in what was known as Galatia, in today's TURKEY. In their origin, they were a part of the great migration which invaded Macedon, led by Brennus. The originals who settled in Galatia came through Thrace under the leadership of Leotarios and Leonnorios c. 278 BC.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Blake Rogers
>g-d
OP is a kike case closed
Blake Carter
>paule was a pharisee
Let me get into this more so people understand.
Paul was raised by a Pharisee (not his Father) but he was not one. He never took on that role.
Not saying that there where not some Benjamites and Judahites that were Pharisees and Sadducee, there were.
Evidently the author of Acts, a Gentile, did not realize that a Pharisee would not be in the employ of the Sadducee High Priest's police force. This would be comparable in the 1980s for a Contra in Nicaragua to he working for the Sandinistas. A "Pharisee" would not work for the Sadducees unless he were no longer a Pharisee. Nor would the latter have recruited him.
They hated each other.
This was the most prestigious institution in Judea. Membership in it was bestowed on the most honored, learned and respected scholars. A man devoid of Jewish scholarship would hardly be a candidate for the Bet Din (Rabbinical Court). Anyone familiar with methods of Rabbinical teaching quickly see when reading Paul's letters that he is not adept as "Rabbinical teaching;" for instance the rudimentary principles of "kal val homer" are literally butchered by Paul...thus betraying his inability to "think" rabincially. For us today we would say that one is "incompetent in Bible 101."
When Paul 'claimed' to be a Pharisee, he chose a respectable pedigree for himself. Unlike the Sadducees, the Pharisees were highly regarded by the populace whose religious values and political aspirations they shared. The subsequent denigration and maligning of the Pharisees in the Gospels have given them a bad name among those readers who have not sifted out the slander from the truth. In Paul's day to be a Pharisee was to be a member of a prestigious majority party.
Paul claimed in his letters that he persecuted the church before his conversion. That means that as a Pharisee he oppressed Nazarenes. But Pharisees NEVER opposed or persecuted the Nazarene sect any more than they did the Essenes. Paul did.
Jackson Bennett
Further proof: argues like a kike, is shizophrenic like one, too.
Caleb Russell
a+a0bzF1 did, again you fail at reding comprehension
all you have is cope like when you say ruth had no moabite ancestry
Asher Taylor
Learn to spell, faggot.
Landon Lewis
>(You)
>(You)
>all you have is cope like when you say ruth had no moabite ancestry
What are you on about ? We were talking about Paul and you switch to Ruth ? LMAO.