So?

We got a neo-monarchy with a good Tsar. It's our traditions, Russia has never known of "democracy". We had some experience with it once, in the 90's, when couple of kikes just robbed the country so Putin had to literally fight with anarcho-capitalists destroying the country for their wealth.

Democracy is the point of lying to gain some votes, the Tsar's dynasty is the point of being in the field which is your occupation, your fate and burden, it's a pure meritocratic formation with people who are being taught how to rule, how to be the true leader, they don't have anything else in minds. "Peoples" are cattle who cannot know anything, all subtle moments, they live their lives with a lot stupid shit, but Tsar can and must. So people just leave the politic field for one who knows smth, for the Tsar — it's the point of russian tradition of leadership: admit that you are too retarded to know how to dispose things well and step back, just live your life, there is the man who knows, who was born and live only for this task.

If a Tsar is very retarded, then he shall be eliminated by his ministers or crowd. Simple as - you want a fella whose occupation is literally his life, not "work for a couple of years".

What's your problem with this? I listen.

youtu.be/QgU9AJFqyDE

Attached: images.jpg (316x159, 6.39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Misc/Russia/Peter.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurultai
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Russia cannot decide if it's the Russian Empire or Soviet Union. I seriously think Russia needed counselling after the fall of the Soviet Union.

Attached: Frens.png (460x128, 12.14K)

Russia never existed until a literal effeminate nigger forced everyone to acknowledge it.

Peter the Great was manly.

Attached: Udmurt Śuaz.jpg (276x183, 16.46K)

well said

Psychopaths are always fags.

realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Misc/Russia/Peter.htm

I don't have a problem with Russia trying to help itself, but I'm still skeptical on whether or not that's what's happening.

Soviet Union was a big deceit of some peasants by a lunatic (Lenin), they didn't know what they do. But so soon the sort of monarchy was restored by Stalin, and after that we got only collapsing till 90's. But now we have the true tradition of our leadership, which always has been.

That's just Afrorambling. Peter the Great's mother was Tatar.

(((Lenin))), (((Stalin))), (((monarchy))), ...

Big noses only come from Africa, and very few of the idiots from nobility don't have them.

>hurr durr democracy hurr durr monarchy
they're all bad, if they're not bad they're fleeting. whatever gets us to space, that's my political ideology, and I don't care who gets hurt along the way. once we're in space we can have all systems competing and nobody can ruin everything or bitch about anything ever again.

Slava Jewkraine

Attached: 1653957291060.jpg (640x511, 122.02K)

Cope harder

and yes: nobody gives a shit of commie ideas, the USSR is being venerated only coz gorillion of russians died to eradicate so-called ariyan supremacy

I think Russia is seriously missing it's potential to rule despite German Autocracy and Jewish Communism. I sense Russia will drag itself back into the Tatar Yoke as a result of not moving on and beyond.

A famous Imperial Russian General predicted the war between Russians and Germans in the 1800s.

the only form of russian well-being is a sorta monarchy (which is called autocracy today) with conservative tending and regional capitalism, it fit russian mentality and culture. The rest is the real hindrance, not our thing, not the thing of the core-russian.

Putin was planted to consolidate power soviet collapse was a takeout for restructuring good luck

>"Russians"

Attached: 220px-Лев_Давидович_Троцкий.jpg (220x299, 16.78K)

The problem with absolute monarchy is one retarded egg is all that's needed to end a dynasty and potentially a country. See Ivan Grozny's retarded but well meaning son for instance. I prefer elective authoritarian monarchy.

kek based troll

That's a Yid.

well in russia tsar' dynasties were literally elected: first Ryrikovichi, second Romanovi (Zemsky Sobor of 1600s).

I do believe the collapse was genuine but Yeltsin and Russia was basically humiliated by the Clintons so he wanted Putin to sort it out. America did help create this situation.

Only during crises. Boyars usually killed each other to get their own way.

and yes, from now the neo-monarchy in russia will be without a "from father to son" thing, but with appointment inside the group of meritocrats.

I'd like them more if they didn't simp for commie cucks. Lots of other countries were agrarian shitholes in the Ww1 era too, and now they are more advanced than Russia. So it's not like Soviet Union was some great leap forward for Russia, it would probably be about the same with the Royal family intact.

Don't worry, two way more competent Russian empires falls, Putins poor shithole will share their fate.

cope brother, not this time, not in your case

>elective authoritarian monarchy
Lmao

I think the Mongols/Early Turks got it right. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurultai

>poor shithole

Your country has the GDP of Nigeria and 95% earn less than $400 a month.

Attached: 16539619018011.png (1064x670, 70.3K)

we had Kerensky's constitutional monarchy, which Britain now has, but the Bolsheviks came and ruined everything, and who brought this infection is Germany and Austria, they should be responsible for it