One more day until the troon menace is defeated forever
What is a woman?
Other urls found in this thread:
a woman is someone I want to have sex with
Trailer: youtube.com
isn't that a daily wire special
ahahaha that trailer was great, can't wait
had no idea lupron was used for chemical castrations
>You don't want to talk about the drugs you give to kids, or..?
Even anti-wokesters can't define it. "Adult human female" is not a definition, it's just using a different word ("female") for "woman".
The correct question/definition is about "What is the difference between a man and a woman?"
So if men didn't exist, woman wouldn't have a definition? They can only be defined by their differences to something else?
That is fucking retarded, friend
And "Female" absolutely has a definition. Woman refers to female, and a female is a human who, when healthy, has the ability to give birth to children and rear them.
This is not hard
>female is a human who, when healthy, has the ability to give birth to children
So transplant a uterus and you have a female?
>female is a human
lol
>the jews are about to btfo the jews omg I'm so excited to watch the jews
both sides are going to consider it a win calling it now
So transplant a uterus and you have a female?
No, you have a male with a uterus transplanted into them?
Is that healthy? Natural? No, it's a surgical operation.
What even is your argument. That if you transplant a womb into a man he becomes a female therefor.. female has no definition and everyone can be a female because they feel like it? Is that literally your actual argument?
>female is a human
We're talking about the context of humans. But of course you have no actual argument so you have to rely on semantic pedantry
Congratulations, you won, I mispoke and did not add a clarify that, in this conversation about humans, I am referring to human females, not that all females are human
Fucking retard.
Lupron, sponsored by Pfizer
Just give me a definition of woman. I am not interested in your other bullshit. If you claim that a 50yo healthy woman is not a woman ("a female is a human who, when healthy, has the ability to give birth to children") then you're retarded. So I ask you again, what is a woman? What is a girl?
What is a human?
Ur mom is a woman
OK, you got btfo. You have no definition for woman, girl, female baby.
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
I did. There are many additional characteristics, such as menopause. Menopause doesn't make a woman not female, obviously, you're just pretending to be stupid because you don't have an actual argument
That woman was capable of getting pregnant and giving birth and producing milk for her child, barring medical problems, and the only reason I even need to include that qualifier is because you don't have an actual argument and are trying to win with word-think. We all know what a woman is, you just have to pretend to be stupid to have any kind of position
So how do you define female baby?
It's been given to you, you're just trying to win with wordthink, which I can do as well with human. Go ahead, define human. And I will show how that definition is wrong because of X Case or Y Exception or Z nuance
Your argument is that women have menopause therefor female has no definition therefor men can become women because they feel like it
The exact same? She is going to mature and be able to get pregnant and produce milk
Is your point that because babies aren't born able to immediately give birth, men can become women because they feel like it and we should teach children to change their sex?
You're such a squirmy mother fucker, the nazi's must have missed your parents in the attic you kike
>Your argument is that women have menopause therefor female has no definition therefor men can become women because they feel like it
I never claimed any of that bullshit. What I claimed is that anti-wokesters laugh about wokesters having no definition, while they themselves haven't one.
Adult human female is functional and descriptive.
Only if obfuscation of reality was your goal would this be an issue.
The implication is important to potential roles in family development and passing on ones genes, but I doubt you care about such 'trivial details'.
The reason people are generally emotional about this issue isn't the definitions.