I love freedom and democracy.
Why would you want a fucking king or a dictator? Are you really that much of an edgelord? (If you don’t want a dictator, then I’m obviously not talking about you). Thank god for the end of monarchy and the founding of the republic.
Other urls found in this thread:
sedm.org
twitter.com
The king's fate is supposed be a reflection of how well he governs. It is in his personal interest to be a good king.
Democracy is Jewish.
The only way to win is to let the people respect you as a leader, and to put it down with an iron first if anyone opposes a dictator or leader. To put fear in the people is the same only way for a United country.
Cry
democracy is dictatorship with extra steps
But user, riddle me this.. how can you love democracy if you've never experienced it?
>democracy is Jewish
Tell that to the Greeks and the romans who invented it.
>To put fear in the people is the same only way for a United country.
To put fear in the people is the only way for a united country**
Tell the ancient Greeks what we call democracy and they would laugh, rape you, and laugh again.
So you aren’t arguing against democracy, you’re arguing against fake democracy? You do love real democracy though?
Democracy is a lie
Exactly. Democracy produces unremarkable ‘leaders’ and allows them to avoid taking responsibility for anything.
Where are the Greeks and Romans now?
No. Fascism and the silence of the people is the only way.
it is in his interest to be a powerful, feared king only.
Communists also loved "freedom" and "democracy". Apparently their definition of "freedom" and "democracy" differs from what I want in life. Liberty.
Democracy is pointless when your country is full of shit skin cunt immigrants who have no attachment to the republic and niggers who actively want to destroy it
I love personal freedom too but first we need a dictator to kill everybody who doesn't like personal freedom
Democrashitty is totalitarian rule by unaccountable shadow oligarchy, who run society via political middle-men. The blame for every problem with society is split between the middle-men, and the population who falsely believes that they are active participants in the government (this is verifiably false), with none of the blame being directed towards those actually running the show. The solution to every problem within a democracy is more democracy, so the corrupt system increasingly embeds itself, with an ever-growing useless bureaucracy, each member of it a spineless social ladder climber who will take any bribe. The populace is divided upon every line possible, and genetic/ideological diversity is deliberately grown to ensure further atomization of society. With the plebs unable to unite on anything, and falsely believing in democratic solutions, they are effectively pacified, allowing the government to get away with acts of hostility that would have them hung in any other system. The elected officials are really only renting the country rather than taking ownership, and care not for its long term success, because any future complications created by their choices is not their problem. Even if your elections are systematically real, a large enough percentage of the population (2/3 to 4/5) are incapable of independent thought, and are easily swayed by the media, who is run by the same oligarchy that prints the money.
Thousands of years of monarchy being the norm, and we will be lucky to survive a century and a half of democratic and socialist republics being the standard. Very few dictatorships can claim the level of control and hostility that modern western democracy has, and simply ask that you don't cause trouble. Democrashitty is a terrible system. I'm sure you won't reply to this because you're a bot or a coward, but maybe some curious tourist will appreciate this post and give it a screenshot.
Democracy is for the slaves. Aspire to be like an emperor who has the good of his people in his heart and can make their life happier without any pushback from fags like in congress.
tl;dr we need another augustus
>Democrashitty is totalitarian rule by unaccountable shadow oligarchy, who run society via political middle-men
And there is no way to have a democracy without the oligarchy part? No way at all? The solution is more democracy.
Democracy, by fatal flaw or by design, is the easiest form of government to influence. This could be improved somewhat by criminalizing usury and fractional banking, and having real currency that is incapable of replicating itself. This removes the problem of literal trillionaires being able to buy every politician on every issue. You're still left with every other flaw though, and no democracy would be willing to try this because JFK got capped for trying executive order 11110. Removing universal suffrage and only giving the vote to land owning males is an improvement, but even the athenians dealt with corruption under this system.
A non-hereditary monarchy (constitutitonal or absolute) is just better. The sword of damocles must be reinstated.
