"for example...

"White" doesn't exist.
There are Europeans, who come in different kind, with the same ancestors but in different quantities and there are exo-Europeans.
Basques are Europeans, phenotypically gracile med mostly.
They are supposed to have a lot of whg blood but it doesn't show too much.

Attached: 001.jpg (3510x2550, 1.35M)

Attached: 002.jpg (3510x2550, 1.29M)

So that mean brit are spic rapebaby? top kek

Attached: 003.jpg (3510x2550, 1.18M)

Most DNA here migrated from France and Spain; not rape, there was no one here, the Ice Age had just ended.

Corded ware, ie Celts. Purest Yamnaya.
That said it's possible they mixed with local comagnoid later on, explaining why insular celts have so many green eyes (mix between whg blue and yamnaya brown) and why the paleo-atlantid phenotype is relatively common there.

They're pure R1B haplogroup

So are chadians.
Celts are red/blond haired white
Basque are negroid looking narbonoide.

Attached: basque2.jpg (880x1390, 138.24K)

>Are basques white or moor
They aren't white or Moors, just like all the other Spaniards
>Then what are they?
Mexicans, just use the US census next time
also Aitor el Otaku because reasons
youtube.com/watch?v=UXhencZUZCM

Attached: wcekzrs4isy31.jpg (1334x750, 93.94K)

Narbo does not exist as a racial category but yes they are generally swarthy.
That's because corded ware didn't really conquer the mountains.
That said Basques are majority R1b as , which is characteristic of yamnaya in Europe.
So there has been some mixture with yamnayas.
Unless R1b in Europe doesn't actually come from Yamnayas.

That's funny because this map is how the guy who coined the term "white race" envisioned it.
Except he had never met Samis and thought they were a 6th race who weren't really human.

Paleo-Atlantid is only really common in Scandinavia lmao, not continental or even insular celts at all.

There is more cro-magnid admixture in the Balkans than there is in Italy and Iberia, due to there being Balkan Borrebies. Don't forget you guys mixed with Western Atlantic farmers which were not very robust...

The strength westerners have over the east is that they look "whiter", but are less robust.

Met a basque guy once. I was loading straw bales in the field and he pulled up on a four wheeler asking if he could buy some.
I'm in Southern Colorado where there are families that have settled here from the old Spanish empire days, so many of the Mexicans here are high Spanish admixture (lighter skin, blue eyes occasionally).
This guy was somewhat different from the usual Spanish people here. His surname was unusual, his eyes were green, and his face was shaped differently.
I'd call him white, but he didn't really look Anglo, German, or French.

Haplogroup doesnt matter, autosomal dna does more. Even Cameroonians are quite high in R1b-V88

It's supposed to be semi common in Ireland and Scotland where Celts are the purest and yamnaya admixture strongest.
Scandis and Balts had the most HG admxiture so it makes sense they'd have strong cromagnoid features.
>not continental or even insular celts at all.
You can see very cromagnoid features in Britanny (I am an example of that to an extent) and Central France (some have downright atavic phenotypes like Pierre Laval).
>Don't forget you guys mixed with Western Atlantic farmers which were not very robust...
You mean EEFs living in Western Europe? Yest they were quite gracile.
Best example of their phenotype would be Sardinia (central).
I disagree that we look whiter, light eyes and blond hair are very common in Russia and the east in General.
When they look swarthy it's often Jewish or Gyspy admixture, while somewhat swarthy looking people are common in western europe including the isles (black irish etc).
As for robust, slavs look overall more neotenous.

Can you explain why autosomal is more important?