Reminder: assault rifles were banned for 10 years under Clinton and Bush. Nothing bad happened...

Reminder: assault rifles were banned for 10 years under Clinton and Bush. Nothing bad happened. Stop letting right wing shills lie to you online.

Attached: 1653849806463m.jpg (1024x812, 145.84K)

Other urls found in this thread:

hoplofobia.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2019-Changes-in-Mass-Shooting-Deaths-Associated-with-the-Federal-AWB.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>posts graph to illustrate point
>doesnt acknowledge the spike under the ban

>Hur, dur, look at how we cherry pick our data

>doesn't know integrals

>Nothing bad happened.
>Columbine
oh

You can't read graphs can you

Would have happened anyway.
But without it even more would have happened.

>assault rifles
smoothbrain

>democrats did this
>takes one look at chicago
>no no only look at this don't look at that

>Would have happened anyway.
>But without it even more would have happened.
I'm going to use that for anything you might say about anything

so it doesnt work. retard

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

durr democrat policies did this

easiest way to reduce violent crimes to virtually zero is to ban assault niggers

>But without it even more would have happened.
Source?

>it works
>well it didn't work but it works better than not working
fucking hate you retards

You do realize that ARs and AKs and other semi autos were just as available right? The only thing the AWB did was ban certain cosmetics such as flash hiders, folding stocks, pistol grips.

Check this jew out

Attached: 1652911549097.jpg (500x409, 29.59K)

As long as semi autos are still allowed I'm not necessarily against it. Ranch rifles and m1 types should be excluded because they're not scary like a ar-47 or an ak-15

>As long as semi autos are still allowed I'm not necessarily against it. Ranch rifles and m1 types should be excluded because they're not scary like a ar-47 or an ak-15
I thought you died, Bill Ruger.

>Overall mass shootings fell compared to any other 10 year period
Depends on your definitions and which centuries don't count. Also, according to statista.com, mass shootings increased in 1994-2004 when compared to 1984-1994. Maybe you meant deaths?

So you admit this all started under Obama?

mass shooting is 3 or more, period. creating new guidelines to obfuscate and attempt to confuse gullible normies is dishonest

Define: Mass Shooting

It's 4 or more.
You'll never convince me that a few doped up niggers shooting themselves in a hood like the apes they are is the same thing as someone buying assault rifles and planning out an attack on a school, shopping mall, store, weeks or months ahead of time.

It only fell because in 2000 they stopped counting gang related shootings and others that happened during "other felonies". You could literally rob a bank and kill a dozen people while doing it and it wouldn't count as a "mass shooting". You could do a driveby on a rival gang's funeral and kill 40 people and it wouldn't count as a mass shooting and you're telling US that we're arguing in bad faith. Get educated, retard.

Attached: someone is.jpg (819x1024, 82.08K)

Use Google you lazy paki

That's wrong because it fell right away in the year it was implemented

>Depends on your definitions
Oh, and I for got to add:
According to wikipedia, there were as many mass shootings in the 1940's as in the year 2000. So since 2000 is between 1994 and 2004, and there was also Columbine and several other shootings, I suspect there were actually less mass shootings in the 1940's than they decade you claim to have the least.
>Overall mass shootings fell compared to any other 10 year period
Yeah. That's not exactly true now is it?

Hello good sirs, I am a humble sopa de macaco, can you explain that peak in the middle of the ban? Thank you very much.

Revive the bill and see how it works. IF it reduces shootings by 70% then make it the law !

it's three faggot. has always been three. until congress votes to change it, liberal thinkgroups' opinions do not count.

Attached: Screenshot 2022-05-29 at 18-08-23 Mass Shootings - Center for Disaster Philanthropy.png (684x94, 9.88K)