Map showing frequency of R1a haplogroup. This shows that Serbs are not genetically Slavic, only linguistically. Eplain this Any Forums!
Map showing frequency of R1a haplogroup. This shows that Serbs are not genetically Slavic, only linguistically...
I don't care, faggot. I'm going to invade your land and rape your women (the few white ones left)
T. Spic
R1b master race here. Fuck you everybody else
>ukrainians and poles pretending to hate russians
lmao they’re tsundere for their own kind
If they mouth swab Serbs you will get 100% Slav DNA
Can somebody explain why the I haplogroup is present only in the Balkans and Scandinavia?
Also this shows that Hungarins are Slavs, sic!
Its all DNA Voodoo bullshit.
R1a is a haplogroup that formed tens of thousands of years before Slavs even existed. You can't use haplogroups this way.
Linguistic identity has very little relation to genetic identity. Look at Turkey and Azerbaijan for example, they speak Turk only because their conquerors told them to and now they fully LARP as them
fart
Lel. You can see the East German border in the gene map.
Kek
because the particular Slavic clans that raped the Balkans were disproportionally led by I2 males
Balkan I2 was likely a minor proto-Slavic lineage, it happened to luck out in the Balkans
serbs are genetically turks which basically means they're asians and not europeans.
Nice one.
Swiss turk talking, got more mosques than churches, nigger.
Salute from 6'4 Grobar, genes that not even muslims raping your country can give you,go and study Turkish, you will need it once it becomes 2nd most spoken language in your brown shithole.
its present all over, just at lower frequencies.. im hplogroup I and im british
Stfu Shaqiri, make sure that toilet shines.
There are less difference between Poles and Russians, than between either of those and Ukrainians. Ukrainian is a mix of eastern slav, turk (steppe mongol turk, not roach turk) and semite. Inherited nastiest qualities of both along with great tendency to project his ancestry on others.
>Serbs are not genetically Slavic, only linguistically.
Well, they are sorta like your distant relative. Still comes to reunions but everyonr knows his mother was a Tatar.
>lmao they’re tsundere for their own kind
Interslavic warfare is a good and time- honored tradition.
>Also this shows that Hungarins are Slavs, sic!
Why not? They have a quite understandable language.
Explain what?
We're all whites, Balkan countries are usually mixed slavic-greek/thracian/illyrian.
Still indo-european, still slavic.
Why is there no regional distinction in only Serbia? Cuckroatia, hungary, west slav and east even romania is differentiated but southern serbs who look like turks and Vojvodina has same 15-20%? I think the study only calculated one area of Serbia and generalized for the whole country.
medieval and bronze age founder effects respectively, the former associated with the Slavic expansion, the latter with proto-Germanics
founder effect = one male/clan reproducing disproportionally compared to others, for proto-Germanics some suggest I1 could've been linked to skilled sailors and such that were incorporated into early nordic bronze age society which largely owes itself to Corded ware from mainland Europe
Retarded take
Good job
r1a R1A LRLRL
A very good pic, but lacks khazars.
Also, the lineage of sovok should be explored more.
Even the Turks are more Slavic than Serbs who are nothing more than Greeks mixed with Gypsies and Arabic slaves from Ottoman Empire