Does Any Forums finally agree that an authoritarian alliance is preferable to a right-wing (including liberals)...

Free enterprise creates prosperity and makes all other things possible.

china has free enterprise too, yet they have plenty of centralization.

That's why fascism will always be auth left.
Unless you kill the strasserists I suppose

I think the idea of political “alliances” as something you’re loyal to is kind of silly. If you believe in any ideology, you should just reach out to whoever is willing to listen to you, and work together with anybody who shares the same goals as you in the moment. If the government right now were to make homeschooling illegal and force kids to go into ZOG drag queen story time public schools, we should work with LibRight to oppose it. If the government were to announce a new war for Israhell right now, we should collaborate with AuthLeft and maybe even LibLeft to oppose it. That doesn’t mean we have to be friends with them forever, just work together when we both have shared interests. This worrying about which political faction you have to be allied with forever is just childish and unnecessary

auth-lefth doesn't imply no free market, read up on market socialism or syndicalism.
and for any reasonable person economic matters are more important as it's what keeps food on the table and a roof over your head and you out of slavery

Without a higher level of transactional trust, no. China has an offensive parody of free enterprise at best, which is why they depend on foreigners for both food and technology.

no idiot, coalitions are necessary as a minority of any given population would share the same exact beliefs. Public support is necessary for any revolutionary or political action so good luck to you and your stormfront buddies doing anything with only 10% of people supporting you

Distributing goods according to supply and demand is necessary to avoid famines and shortages. But it's incompatible with distributing goods equitably. As soon as there's a conflict, principled auth-lefties tend to choose the latter and their subjects inevitably pay the price.

my cure for authoritarianism: guillotine

Attached: 1651947967503.jpg (519x878, 48.21K)

that happened only once historically with the bolsheviks whom I think were either idiots or actively working against russia. All other socialist movements from then on were supported and it's leaders hand picked by the bolsheviks so that is why they were all collectivist in nature.
But this is by no means the only way auth-left can function

My apologies. I was just referring to the free market as I thought people tended to associate that with the economic right. I guess there are some variants of socialism that allow for relatively free markets, although I believe those are more in the libertarian left side of things.
> and for any reasonable person economic matters are more important as it's what keeps food on the table and a roof over your head and you out of slavery
And social issues determine whether or not my child has to be molested by drag queens and brainwashed in anti-White CRT guilt in public school, whether or not my country looks like America or Greater Honduras, and whether or not the nigger that killed a three-year old White child gets the death penalty or gets sent to 10-year adult daycare

>economic matters are more important
>Auth-left
Of course the group that can't into economy thinks economic matters are the most important.

I think one axis is missing. I can get along with tankies, libertarians and hippies, as long as they're anti degeneracy.

state execution is an authoritarian concept...

Fuck all you faggot niggers.
Simple, one word answer.
>NO
/thread

No go finally show your true colors. Commies and nazis are the same shit. Fuck the government!

Who said you need a state to build a guillotine? That's like saying hangings are state executions

>that happened only once historically
I don't understand how his addresses the inherent conflict between supply/demand distribution and equitable distribution.
It happens any time there's a shortage of anything. It's something your ideology needs an answer for but it has none. All you can do is hope that the ideologies in charge choose markets over equity when a drought, crop failure, or natural disaster occurs.
Hope isn't much of a platform.

maybe... but yes fuck the libertarian left.

Attached: boulderlob nazbol ussr quote you must work in order to obtain food handouts etc.jpg (794x1200, 191.48K)

Coalitions may be necessary in certain instances, but they become cumbersome when they become permanent, because then you have to sacrifice very important parts of your platform which are considered “controversial” “for the stability of the coalition”, causing your party to become de-radicalized and off-centered from its original purpose, making its name associated with the very establishment it once set out to fight. My point was simply that we should be wary of forming permanent attachments to coalitions, not that we should never engage in them

Kek

priority for any nation should first be reasonable and well compensated employment, citizens owning their own homes and having the means to afford necessities plus some luxury goods and then everything else. You just spout some crt and tranny bogeyman nonsense because you are too dumb to look at the bigger picture and focus on what your favorite media guy told you. As for niggers yes they should be removed from society completely