Fact Check

>THAT SCHOOL SHOOTING WAS A FALSE FLA-
Not so fast, Detective Chud.
archive.is/8RObr

Attached: FactCheck.jpg (864x1433, 307.53K)

Other urls found in this thread:

law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1981/79-6-3.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

How do they know unless they committed it?

Attached: unnamed.jpg (655x527, 36.32K)

wrap it up boys. looks like absolutely nothing nefarious is happening that suddenly causes a mass shooting event every week. just part and parcel and all that

We got too cocky, schizobros

>if it's false flag that means government, media and other powers that be, colluded together to trick the public into a state of sadness and fear in order to manipulate them into accepting certain solutions they otherwise would not accept, also it might mean no kids actually died
>i want this to be a lie

>Federal government refuses to investigate why the police stood down
Yeah, totally not a false flag

of course it wasn't. it was a reflection of a sick culture that values guns over human life. We must ban AR15's

the fact that this is enough to convince the majority of the NPC drones is such a fucking blackpill. so obvious it was Sandy Hook 2.0.
>EVERYBODY MUST CHECK IN

yes I agree we must ban the evil Automatic Rifle 15s.

Thanks Ciara O'Rourke

They should have gone in without tactical gear and eisked their lives just on the off chance one kid or two would be saved?
Why don't the parents rush in like idiots then if they wanted that to happen so badly? Why blame the cops?

Falseflagbros, it’s ogre.

Oh thanks, now I know it's a false flag for sure.

YEAH GUYS, SORRY BUT WE CHANGED THE INTERNAL DEFINITION OF FALSE FLAG IN 2021. SO, IT WASNT A FALSE FLAG. ITS ACTUALLY CALLED A NOT TRUE FLAG NOW.
gg thanks for playing, get globohomoed.

Because the parents tried to do that and were assaulted and detained by the cops. The veil will be lifted and every cop will be a target of the general public and they deserve to suffer greatly.

>They should have gone in without tactical gear and eisked their lives just on the off chance one kid or two would be saved?
That's literally their job.
>Why don't the parents rush in like idiots then if they wanted that to happen so badly?
They tried, the cops stopped them.

Yes, shill selverstein, they are supposed to do that according to their own memos. Innocent civilians come before police and if they have a problem with it, they would find a new line of work. That's literally from their own manual. How many kids were alive at 12 that died from their untreated wounds at 12:50? How in the world could they assume he was a barricaded subject when 911 kept getting called and gunshots kept being heard? Why did 100 cops listen to some fat school district pig? Why did uvalde have a school shooter drill with their police 2 months prior and then do nothing they learned there? Your time is coming to an end, I think you feel that.

Damn, retards really do browse this board. Did mummy show you how to post?

Warren v DC storytime
>In the early morning hours of March 16, 1975, appellants Carolyn Warren, Joan Taliaferro, and Miriam Douglas were asleep in their rooming house at 1112 Lamont Street, N.W. Warren and Taliaferro shared a room on the third floor of the house; Douglas shared a room on the second floor with her four-year-old daughter. The women were awakened by the sound of the back door being broken down by two men later identified as Marvin Kent and James Morse. The men entered Douglas' second floor room, where Kent forced Douglas to sodomize him and Morse raped her.
>...
>For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands of Kent and Morse.
>Appellants' claims of negligence included: the dispatcher's failure to forward the 6:23 a. m. call with the proper degree of urgency; *3 the responding officers' failure to follow standard police investigative procedures, specifically their failure to check the rear entrance and position themselves properly near the doors and windows to ascertain whether there was any activity inside; and the dispatcher's failure to dispatch the 6:42 a. m. call.
>The trial judges correctly dismissed both complaints. In a carefully reasoned Memorandum Opinion, Judge Hannon based his decision in No. 79-6 on "the fundamental principle that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen."
law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1981/79-6-3.html

Attached: copustaja.jpg (657x684, 71.56K)

I knew about that already. I didn't know the justification. It's obvious that the law means police don't have to work for some big celebrity over someone else when it says particular citizen. How the fuck could someone take the absolute worst take on it, then every other judge was just like, "sure, sounds good to me". It was created so the fucking rockefellers of the world don't get to control the police. The funny part is, celebs actually do control them but normal citizens still get fucked.

Based cops on thot patrol let nature run its course

Shooter was troon.

Attached: 1653655657506.png (554x680, 381.36K)