Can't defeat a neighboring country that's a fraction of the size

>1M western troops take 5 months to destroy iraqs army, can’t take bagdad.
>200k Russians attack Ukraine, don’t win instantly
ITs OvEr!

If being a failed state was grounds for being nuked, America would be long gone!

>it's ok if our special operation is a failure, whattaboutamerica in iraq?!
lol even the vatniks are starting to accept defeat at this point

>don’t compare this to anything other than my imagination
Kek

> Fights with an expeditionary forces of peace time against the country just four times less which started fourth wave of total mobilization and literally force men to its army in the streets, on gas stations, on street markets.
> That huge mobilized country gets weapons, ammo, a lot of other equipment, military councilors, intel, mercenaries, fuel and many other resources from NATO every day.
> Doesn't even plan mobilization. Still grinds the hostile military with casualties in 1:6 to 1:10 ratio to his advantage, gains new territories, has full support of his nation.
> Gets extra billions and billions of profit from export comparing peaceful years every day.
> Literally less than half of the world population supported his enemy in the UN vote. Even less joined the sanctions.
> Abortions number has decreased 10 times since 1991, murder number has decreased 5 times since his first presidential term. Accordin UN stat, alcohol consumption decreased about twice, his population drinks less than Frenches, Germans, Spaniards, let alone Brits now. Drug consumption drastically decreased too, there are 10 times less overdose deaths then in the US aka "the leader of free world." The number of new HIV-infected people has been decreasing for 7 years.
> Could become a corrupted old man who stayed 10 years too long as a president in national history. Instead of it he will be a ruler who started the Russian Irredenta, returning of lost lands and unifying the divided Russian nation.

Attached: Putin-beer.jpg (480x360, 16.2K)

I want to squeeze his cheeks like a baby.

If Putin werent winning these threads wouldnt be necessary.

He even admitted he's Russian lmao, it's pretty given.

>russia forces Donbabwaens into army
>lies and blames Ukraine
>AcTUalLY We aRE FighTiNG NATO
this is the latest vatnik shill line when they try to explain their horrendous performance. reminder not a single NATO soldier has been sent to Ukraine
also nice statistics, did you find those from incel slave Z?
>Gets sanctioned to oblivion, only can sell gas at this point
How many in the UN supported russia in the war? something like 5 countries lol, all shitholes
>claims aids have decreased, still has Africa tier statistics, highest in europe
why can't russians stop being homosexual? it's easy.
>putin could have ended with a mediocre legacy 10 years ago, not his legacy is one of failure and embarrassment
no refunds

if putin were winning, he wouldn't need to pay a troll army to shill on the internet

Attached: chadvsvirgin.png (809x328, 306.57K)

so, is Ukraine winning?

Both Ukraine and Russia are losing. Russia is just losing more

Pretty typical hawk mode bro.