What was the actual cause of the Civil War?

Eustace Mullins presents a interesting perspective on the issue.
A incredible investigator, Eustace Mullins wrote some of the most notable books about the conspiracy of our world. This is no doubt. The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, Murder by Injection and many other books lay out the people behind the monetary conspiracy. But towards the end of his life, he wrote a book called the Curse of Canaan, which describes the grand conspiracy as a Luciferian agenda against the fair skinned people of Shem, while the non fair skinned were the descendants of Canaan.
This chapter is about the Civil War in the USA.
Its quite an interesting listen to.
Have a listen, and post what you think really caused the civil war in the USA.

bitchute.com/video/K4mOqN2PK1tk/

Attached: civil war.jpg (474x336, 59.64K)

Other urls found in this thread:

census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html#y1860
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

states rights bro, jackson did his part, and harrison, representing the head to jacksons heel, didnt do his part as president, they were the vanguard in a campaign that neccesitated prolonged conflict across decades to retain independance against monopolys. lincoln did what washington did against 3 rebellions, but simply was not a military man
a legacy tried and true, beaten to a pulp

It was to stop slavery from expanding into the north like the confederates planned when they declared war, if the south had won, the north would have been overrun and just like the south filled up with niggers

>candian perspective on US history.
you really think the civil war was about slavery?
and not that it was just a useful political tool for Lincoln? ever heard of Linconia?

The cause of the war was that the South decided to secede and the North decided to use military force to stop them from seceding. Simple as.

I agree. But Mullins presents a interesting concept,
the 13th 14th and 15th amendments were enacted under martial law, and by legal standards any law passed during that time is null and void after martial law has ended. He is correct but notes that no court challenge has ever been made.

This

what trips me out is how johnson vetod all the 4 reconstruction acts after the civil war.
i didnt know that until i read this chapter.

1860 version of shitposting, the south got trolled hard.

The civil war was a war of conquest between an industrial yeoman republic and a neo-feudal christian republic

Lincoln was an absolute Fucking idiot. The "tractor" and mechanized farm equipment was mere years away.
The JEW-Merchants of the "North" absolutely yanked the fucking RUG out from under the Southern-way of life (on consequently the production of nationally vital goods) without having ANY viable-replacement for that labor availible.
The Entire "Civil War" was ground-zero for virtue-signaling, spawned from ludicrous ideological GARBAGE vomitted from the Jews upon the honest, unsuspecting American, who paid in TORRENTS OF BLOOD for their naivety

How can anyone blame the men of the Confederacy for their conviction and belief in the way of life that provided for them, their family and nation at large,


The Civil War was ground-zero for the type of catastrophic ideological virtue-signaling without regard to the real world consequences that define the Democrat party to this very day.

Attached: Savannah 4.jpg (503x586, 87.75K)

after the civil war they indepted all red states by hundreds of millions, at that time.
then they raised property taxes to steal the land of the southerners.
you should listen to this real hard because this is what they are going to do again to steal our property.
They even reduced the number of supreme court justices to oppose the reconstruction acts. lmao

Absolutely based outtake

***There were more Black Slaveholders than White before the Civil War***
census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html#y1860
in 1860, the peak of slavery, the total free population of the United States and its territories was (27,489,561)
>(384,884) TOTAL Slaveholders owned (3,953,760) slaves
>(261,198) owners were either Black or Mulatto,
broken down:
>(155,148) owners were Black,
>(106,770) owners were Mulatto
>(123,686) owners were White
THUS
>68% of Slave Owners in 1860 in the entire USA were Black or Mulatto (261,198)/(384,884)
>40% of Slave Owners in 1860 in the entire USA were Black (155,148)/(384,884)
>28% of Slave Owners in 1860 in the entire USA were Mulatto (106,770)/(384,884)
>32% of Slave Owners in 1860 in the entire USA were WHITE (123,686)/(384,884)
Indisputable facts.
It is an almost IDENTICAL scenario, as the very same DEMOCRAT party has brought this nation to the BRINK of cultural (and actual) Civil War over nearly the same egregious lie and manipulative ideological subversion they

Attached: savannah 11.jpg (597x593, 56.23K)

He's not wrong. I doubt the 13th and 15th wouldn't be challenged, but I would like to see the 14th Amendment nullified if the case can be made in court. That amendment has been at the heart of ever single problematic SCOTUS judicial activist ruling of the past 150 years.

>virtue signaling
>naivety
wrong
it was the last american war fought over honor, and at that, only because of the capability of weaponry past such a time to engage dishonorably

King George's grandson in the south tried to stop the Union's sex trafficking of black kids by returning the colonies under British rule but Lincoln who ran the sex and drugs industry started a war to keep his access to the merchandize. Have you ever seen Lee's birth certificate? It's carefully hidden so (((goyim))) don't find the truth.

youre insane

there want any 'honor' in the biblically-horrific bloodshed that was the American Civil-War.

nigger are you retarded or what? the war was about jewish demons wanting to keep their nigger pets as slaves while we wanted to ship the monkeys back to africa. printing of dollars was also an issue as kikes wanted a kike controlled central bank with a fiat currency issued by them and not congress. all wars are almost always about jews and their satanic plan to place Aryans under the yoke of talmudic slavery.

>What was the actual cause of the Civil War?
jews

Nigger what? sauce me on that.

compare to the lights brigade
conversely, compare to the revolution
a man has such agency as to fight with freedom and liberty against his brothers even amidst gattling guns, for the dead mans land was not allowed to be established
this is strictly due to the bravery in cavalry, and any man could have recognised his opponent and surrendered of his own volition and with respect to due carnage by which he might have stood against, and be that by Might

So you are saying there was honor in what the Lincoln admin did?

as much as an average roman emperor might have given opportunity to his generals