Liberal cities have highest murder rates

stacey abrams is shitposting. dont you have some ballot trafficking busywork work to do

niggers. not liberals.

How has it measurably improved their lives? Has it made their city safer?

like i said, they'll refute it with trash examples like your own. a better one is "the guns flood in from outside the cities." everyone knows it doesn't work.

democrats/libshits all know that city violence is niggers killing niggers and they really don't care because it never impacts them or anyone they care about (other people like themselves). by presenting this argument you force them into thinking/discussing how violence is not about guns but rather niggers.

guns don't kill people, people kill people.

How has it made their lives better? I don't see a significant change in their quality of life for the past 50 years that hasn't been in line with everywhere else.

In other words, violent crime, technology, and medical care all have similar trends no matter the politics. I just don't see which of their policies have robustly panned out.

You'd have to show that in a red vs blue area, there a significant differences in outcome.

Is this even a serious question? How does giving them access to social programs? Not imprisoning them for being poor or homeless (something republican districts absolutely do), giving them better access to education and healthcare and other things? How has this made their lives better? Really? Get real dude, you and any other republican spewing this nonsense sound like total uneducated idiots

>How has it made their lives better?
It's such a stupid question. Just see here it's like an inexplicable question to ask and it's being asked by someone who hates poor people and wants them all in prison. It always is. That's what rightoids want and that's what they're after when they do this dumb "muh democrat cities with crime" rhetorical game. INB4 you gaslight your true objectives.

stupid thread there are no republican cities and of course denser higher populated areas have more crimes

It’s because conservatives smuggle guns into the city or criminals go to red states to stock up on guns. Destroy the supply, civilian ownership of guns, and the crime rate will decline.

This only works on the mouth-breathing burgers.

Note:
>Denser populations necessarily mean more interactions per day in geometrically increasing fashion.
>Human beings are limited in how much they can process/decide per day.
>Meeting each individual on their terms is more costly than each individual following general rules/laws/norms that restrict interaction as number of interactions per day increases.
>For large and dense populations to run efficiently and feed and house and provide for all citizens, their freedoms must necessarily be limited by the sheer fact of the population density.
>Democrats enact more regulations.
>The larger the population of the city/town the higher the probability they are Democrat.
>Larger population cities, regardless of dominating party, has higher crime than lower populations.
>Thus, a normal distribution will necessarily show Democrat run cities as higher crime rates.

Eat shit faggit.

Yes when you give free money to people you can damn sure hurt them, give an amphetamine addict (like you) 10 grand and see if they survive it. Social programs are a racket and are used to buy votes and keep people dependent on the hand that feeds.

Taking someone elses money to pay for these programs that never fix the problems is literally enslaving the payer to "benefit" the recipient.

>crime rate will become africa-tier
ftfy, how are those gun free zones working out

Uh nah dude social programs obviously help people who benefit from them. I don't see how that can even be in a debate. I mean, you don't believe the things you're saying, you just hate poor people and want them to suffer and want them to be in prison. The entire rightwing is predicated on hate for the poor, minorities and homosexuals. Maybe throw in a little woman hate, too. It's all about hate and hurting people so it makes you seethe when there are people much more morally decent out there than you who take care of the poor and offer them opportunities and work to remedy the injustice of capitalism

keep on giving freebies and never force them to learn skills, that policy has been a technological boom in africa. all personal and corporate subsidies should be immediately ended.

Voting democrat keeps them in the slave pit right where you want them. Black people were doing better by every metric immediately after Jim Crow ended than they are now, before you got them lassoed again