When Liberals talk about "gun control" what do they mean?

When Liberals talk about "gun control" what do they mean?
Like all guns, or just "assault rifles"?

Attached: 1263232606995_Reaction_faces_part_1-s350x345-151481-580 (1).jpg (350x345, 33.47K)

I think most liberals, outside of the NYC and San Fran enclaves, know that an outright ban isn't happening. I think most liberals want heavy vetting for gun purchases

They mean all firearms, they just can't start with that.

They mean all guns. They know that criminals will get guns either way, it's literally just a personal "I don't like you because I'm better than you" thing. They don't care about the arguments, or the data, or the logic or reasoning, it's 100% this argument
> " Oh no, Event* happened. We should finally take all the guns away from those stupid dirty rednecks I fucking hate.
> we can't take them? I thought you were the police! What if those hillbilly inbreds want to shoot us! You need to take their guns now
> I would literally rip up the constitution if it meant inconveniencing more republitards lol
It's literally the argument of retards who politically posture themselves to no end for the hope that they can look like marvel heroes, focused on the sole fact that they hate all gun owners more than life itself.
>inb4 you aren't gonna use em mutt
Ah yes, let me talk discuss overthrowing the government seriously on a board heavily monitored by the FBI and liberal faggot jannies

Attached: 1652973039259.jpg (824x404, 220.09K)

They don't "mean" anything. Most liberals/leftists/shitheads are a bunch of semi-retarded faggots without an original thought in their heads. "Gun Control" is just a catchphrase that they heard on the TV, that's currently trending. They have no actual data, logic, or opinions on the subject. They'd switch over to "climate change" or "Russia Man Bad" in one heatbeat and forget about guns, in the next.

What is an "assault weapon"? Why is an AR-15 an assault weapon but a semi-automatic pistol isn't?

Diversity is the single greatest public health threat in America. It is causally correlated to the mental health crisis and it is a crime against humanity.

When America was 90% white and teens were allowed to bring semi autos and revolvers to school, there were ZERO mass shootings at schools.

Diversity everywhere, throughout all time, and for all life forms, has correlated with strife and violence, social collapse, and mental health decline. In nature it results in extinctions, whether by the diversity itself killing the native animal or a disease brought by diversity (such as the Chinese blight wiping out the largest native tree of North America: the Chinese chestnut).
Diversity, for all life on earth, is inherently genocidal; and for humans it is physically, mentally, spiritually, and societally debilitating and damaging.

BAN DIVERSITY. There is NO REASON to be diverse when it threatens everyone’s safety so much. All guns could disappear tomorrow, and you would still be stabbed in the neck with a fork, as long as you are subject to diversity.

When will it stop! Diversity needs to end. It was a failed experiment. It’s time to move on from failure and seek what actually works. Diversity does not work, has never worked, and never will work. It is the most disastrous and destructive thing to befall America. Whether we are talking about the decline of education, the collapse of institutions that care about public health, the mental health crisis, the spread of plagues, or the inability to mitigate corruption or hold it accountable (because we are too diverse to have functional institutions): diversity is directly responsible for all of it.

Diversity is a crime against humanity and inherently destructive and debilitating to all life on earth.

don't forget
>fully semi-automatic
heard that one from twitter

They mean "trust the police dude they will protect you just give up your rights to protect yourself"

Attached: ACCEB71E-99EB-48B5-90E3-197F1A1EA2CF.jpg (1024x884, 77.48K)

but aren't social workers supposed to replace the police?

Attached: 1631025221792.jpg (700x635, 34.17K)

>semi auto pistol isn’t
It is. They will come for those too. They want all guns banned, including revolvers (eventually).
They have a tangible agenda unfolding, and they have struggled to ban guns since they began in the late 80’s and early 90’s.

Americans will be told that if they give up freedom, they get safety. They will never be safe as long as they have diversity of course, and they will just be stabbed in the neck with a fork at the end of it all, or be killed by some new globodemon disease (that is spread via diversity).

Attached: AB66E219-174C-4B2C-A2E6-610AEC0C68B8.jpg (773x841, 108.81K)

raising the age to buy guns to 21, nigger

Attached: 1647271136026s.jpg (125x120, 2.58K)

But the people saying they want to restrict gun ownership are the same people saying the police need to be defended and in fact the same people who are now pointing fingers saying cops are useless because they won't stop a school shooter. So I guess nobody but criminals will have guns now?

Attached: 7e3.png (900x659, 605.06K)

***defended, fucking autocorrect

*****DEFUNDED FUCKING NIGGER PHONE

Everything will be banned.
Look at Europe.

Thats the plan. Always has been.

You can't own half the things you should be able to and your grandparents could.

they don't want any guns

Yes, Americans were donating warplanes, cannons and battleships to the WWI war effort. All three are not a typo.

The US Federal government has their neck firmly around America's wealthy (north of 1mm income per year) since WWII

Europe has guns, Switzerland has like 2 million privately owned guns
>inb4 niggers
yes I know, its not the guns but the nigger that causes high firearm death rates

that's it

Attached: switzerland guns 1653440190043.png (390x390, 293.92K)

i don’t recall the 2nd amendment differentiating between classes of weapons.

Yeah, come to think of it, neither do I.

How would that have stopped any of the recent shootings? Wouldn't they just wait 3 years and then carry them out?

There were plenty of mass shooters over 21.

They want the 2nd amendment repealed. Gun control means no 2nd.

Remember Robert O'Rourke?