I made this thread earlier, but I thought I'd make it at least one more time

I made this thread earlier, but I thought I'd make it at least one more time.

Anybody have any interesting stuff WEF stuff to share from their 2022 annual meeting? I watched a panel earlier that was all about the metaverse. They want you to pay real money for fake Air Jordans and other virtual goods in the metaverse. They talked about how maybe the United Nations would create a regulatory framework for standardizing the rules of the metaverse. They heavily implied that there would be internet anonymity since your avatar would be an actual photographic image of your physical likeness, except maybe in the case of certain groups like the Arab Spring who need privacy (color revolution shenanigans).

The founder of Second Life, Philip Rosedale, was on the panel talking about how people tend to moderate their behavior much more on the internet when a physical avatar is speaking to them rather than it just being text based. So that moderators with a physical form can be used for behavior modification purposes.

They also mentioned how the AI computer will do a much better job of upscaling, constantly retraining you to do your job better. I'm sure that won't create any kind of power imbalance when it comes to worker and employer relations when your boss is a fucking AI computer program.

That's just a few things I picked up from it. Do any of you guys have anything interesting to share?

youtube.com/watch?v=XZAjv3MbCK4

Attached: KlausPepe.png (963x949, 573.41K)

Other urls found in this thread:

breitbart.com/politics/2022/05/24/world-economic-forum-australias-esafety-commissioner-calls-for-recalibration-of-human-rights-free-speech/
twitter.com/AndrewLawton/status/1528779966644731906
youtube.com/watch?v=9ccd3LMNMl8
cfr.org/membership/roster
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_family
weforum.org/agenda/authors/marc-benioff
weforum.org/agenda/authors/lynn-forester-de-rothschild
youtube.com/watch?v=Pi72kfigcL8
www3.weforum.org/docs/AM13/WEF_AM13_CodeofConduct.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham_House_Rule
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/370693820/#q370745453
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/369261705/#q369281550
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/367027212/#q367028440
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/356397077/#q356397471
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/351931508/#q351931508
bilderbergmeetings.org/meetings/meeting-2019/participants-2019
youtube.com/watch?v=oLJESX1C_P8
twitter.com/loffredojeremy/status/1527521228688445442
twitter.com/max_gagliardi/status/1529069996411916290
weforum.org/agenda/2019/05/this-credit-card-has-a-carbon-emission-spending-limit/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Oh, also, they talked about how they need to train the metaverse users about their privacy rights, LOL. They said that they can teach them that their are trade offs. For example, they can pay more money if they want to retain their privacy data and have an ad-free experience. Or they can get a cheaper experience if they're willing to sell their data to various multinational corporations and governments so that they can get more content directed personally toward them at an individual. Obviously, internet privacy doesn't fucking exist. But it seems interesting how they're talking about training people to voluntarily give up more and more privacy for convenience specifically as it relates to the metaverse. The engineering of consent stuff again.

Attached: World Economic Forum.png (286x176, 6.14K)

Australia's esafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, calls for a recalibration of human rights and free speech online.

" “We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere, and everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be,” Inman Grant said.

“So I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, from the freedom of speech to be[ing] free from online violence,” she added."

breitbart.com/politics/2022/05/24/world-economic-forum-australias-esafety-commissioner-calls-for-recalibration-of-human-rights-free-speech/

twitter.com/AndrewLawton/status/1528779966644731906

Attached: freespeechrecalibaration.png (730x828, 416.11K)

Interesting. Bourla mentioned about Pfizer's announcement to distribute all of their vaccines and medicines at cost (only what it takes to produce and ship them) to the poorest 45 countries in the world. What a charitable guy. Not only that but Pfizer is running a test program with five countries (Rwnada, Ghana, Senegal, Ghana and Malawi) where they will help set up infrastructure to distribute the vaccines and medicine (lol) to the local population more effectively and identify barriers. He also wants to build partnerships with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation/GAVI Vaccine Alliance, the World Health Organization and Doctors without Borders to help in the distribution process as a health provider.

He also mentioned how the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation "Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance" program was originally conceived at the World Economic Forum in Davos before Bill Gates took it over. Klaus laughed at said that it was his "child" and that he has many "children" and all the audience laughed in response.

youtube.com/watch?v=9ccd3LMNMl8

Attached: albertbourla.jpg (275x183, 9.43K)

Bourla also talked about how important intellectual property for these vaccines and medicines is. Biontec held the intellectual property for the vaccine but Pfizer was manufacturing and distributing it. Basically, they had an oral agreement between the two for two months before they signed a research contract and then a whole year after the Biontec/Pfizer partnership before they signed a commercial contract. So, he talks about how important trust was with their partner and how that doesn't happen in the corporate world. And then everyone clapped!

He also brought up the Astrazeneca's partnership with Oxford in developing and manufacturing the vaccine.

Lol, he called the fear that civilization could disappear forever due to COVID "pandemic" a "tremendous weapon" to motivate different stakeholders and actors to cooperate together. I think that's bullshit they all know it's a scam. But that fear is certainly a weapon for the public to openly accepting these public private partnerships between international health agencies (WHO), national governments, multinational pharmaceutical corporations, smaller research pharmaceutical companies and tax-exempt foundations (Bill & Melinda Gates/GAVI) that will dominate all health policies over the the public.

They also reveal how they really see this all as a military strategy. Powerful weapon... Kek.

Bourla is basically saying what we've heard over the last two years. COVID is going to be around forever, kek. It's not going away. He's giving up permission to get our economic and social lives back unless there's another dangerous variant. Then we have to give up our lives again, lol. He says that Pfizer can keep updating the vaccines every time there's a new variant mutation.

Klaus asked him if we should be afraid of a new virus and Bourla brings up the monkey pox. He says we shouldn't be afraid but we should be "prepared".

Attached: billandmelindagatesfoundation.png (280x180, 3.56K)

He says even though there's new treatments you should still get vaccinated so you have a better chance of surviving and not infecting others. "You vaccinate not only for yourself. You vaccinate to protect society and particularly to protect those that you love the most because they are the ones that you are together" he says.

Bourla is concerned that compliance will drop off in vaccine retention with each additional dose. Because of that he wants a vaccine that supposedly lasts a year. Basically, people will be more likely to take the clot shot if they know they only have to do it annually as opposed to every three months.

He also mentions that if they combine the COVID-19 vaccine with a flu shot vaccine that will also help improve compliance. Basically making things more convenient will improve compliance. He's a clever guy...

Klaus says that getting vaccinated may be the standard for future meetings. He also keeps praising Switzerland's vaccine and testing requirements.

Bourla then praised EMA and FDA did well in terms of regulations. Because the regulation process was normally six months and now they're doing it in one week, lol. He's basically advocating that the health regulations be streamlined and perhaps combined in individual countries to speed up the approval process for vaccines.

Lol, so Klaus asked Bourla who gets the liability problem if the vaccines fucks you up. Bourla said that the government is taking on the liability, nor the corporations. But, of course, we all know this is pretty much bullshit. Nobody is going to be liable.

Now he's going on the "fanatic group of anti-vaxxers". So, he's basically saying countries with less advanced legal systems would be more vulnerable to lawsuits from this fanatic anti-vaxxers than countries like the U.S. for example. But he thinks that concern is behind them now.

Attached: worldeconomicforumyounggloballeaders1.jpg (799x1024, 124.33K)

Klaus says they both him and Bourla were targets of the anti-vaccine movement and the conspiracy people (he's talking about us, Any Forums!!!).

Now Klaus and Bourla are talking using MRNA technology to advance all kinds of medicines besides just vaccines. He wants to see shingles, flu and other types of vaccines used with MRNA technology. Then he's talking about it being used to help cancer patients. Finally, he's talking about using MRNA technology to use to people for gene editing if they have a genetic disease they were born with.

Attached: aldoushuxleyquote.jpg (533x439, 218.76K)

Now I'm watching a climate change panel with John Kerry, Bill Gates and Gim Huay Neo (Managing Director, Centre for Nature and Climate at the World Economic Forum).

The state department presidential envoy for climate led by John Kerry together with the World Economic Forum created the First Movers Coalition.

For those that don't know, John Kerry has some jewish descent and is also descended from the Boston Brahmin Forbes family that made their fortune in opium and tea trading between the U.S. and China. John Kerry's brother Cameron Forbes Kerry is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. So, they're an old bloodline family.

Let's see if they say anything interesting during this panel.

"Bob Kerrey
Cameron F. Kerry
Peggy Kerry"
cfr.org/membership/roster

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_family

Attached: cameronkerry.jpg (640x852, 125.12K)

So basically this coalition will be made up of companies that agree to only buy materials, engage in transportation services and fuels that will reduce "emissions". She emphasizes they want to reach "net zero" as Bill Gates has mentioned in the past. Net zero means as close to no emissions whatsoever folks... completely poverty and austerity. They're focusing on the steel, cement, aviation, and shipping industries that supposedly account for 30% of global emissions... You know, stuff that you need in order to survive... the stuff that gets you your food.

Governments also also partnering with the First Movers Coalition.

Kerry says that Bill Gates is the coalitions "primary implementation partner". Kerry says this is the flag ship public private partnership for deep decarbonization. He's basically saying that the market will embrace these new climate based technologies through a government signal like how the market responded to the government signal toward vaccine initiatives during the "pandemic" because the companies knew there was a purchaser there. So, basically if multinational corporations know for a fact that the government will buy these technologies, then they will produce them because they have no monetary risk of loss. So these coalition has members like Fedex, Ford motor company, etc. These companies represent 9 trillion dollars of global worth. It represents about 50 percent of global GDP.

Shippers are agreeing to build "carbon free" ships. They're talking about microsoft and salesforce committing to "carbon dioxide removal technologies" by 2030.

The new government partners include Sweden, India, Japan, Norway, Italy, the UK, Singapore and Denmark. Basically, he's saying governments can pass laws that basically force industry to adopt by these regulations (not that the big boys aren't perfectly willing to go along with that but this will eventually apply to small businesses as well through environmental social credit scores).

Attached: agenda21cover.gif (312x403, 30.08K)

Bill Gates says the First Mover coalition is about engaging the private sector on the demand side. Basically, if they scale up production of green products for these companies, it will become less expensive for companies to purchase them according to Bill. He mentions lithium batteries, solar and wind as examples but wants to expand into green hydrogen. Now he's mentioning tax credits to be given to these companies to incentivize them to go along with this. He also wants these partnerships between major multinationals and smaller companies. So Bill Gates feels like innovation has been better than he expected in this process.

He's talking again about public private partnerships where governments are pushing this stuff but private corporations will have representatives essentially telling them what to do be doing as far as picking the right technology and how to be efficient.

Ruth Porat, the CFO of Alphabet Inc and its subsidiary google, is now speaking. Btw, she is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Porat is saying Google made a commitment by 2022 to take action to help a billion people live more sustainably. For example, if you use google maps to try to plan driving trips, they will give you data for the "greenest route". They're saying they want tp be net zero by 2030 and only use carbon free energy.

Once again, she also advocates for public-private partnerships because she says "it's the only way to solve the climate crisis". So again, she mentions that by having companies commit to these agendas, it will reduce the risk for suppliers and thus help stimulate innovation. Basically, these companies have an absolute guarantee for profit because these companies and governments have to purchase their supplies and/or invest in their technology.

She's says having "clarity and certainly about demand does catalyze growth in markets".

Attached: Foreign Affairs - CFR.png (664x279, 89.49K)

Now, Marc Benioff, the founder and co-CEO of Salesforce, is speaking. Benioff is on the WEF's Board of Trustees. He's also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Salesforce is supposedly already at "net zero" emissions across their value chain.

Benioff says we're witnessing the emergence of a new "environmental capitalism". You guys remember the "Council for Inclusive Capitalism" run by Lynn Forester de Rothschild and is partnered with the Vatican? Lynn is also an agenda contributor for the World Economic Forum.

"A member of the World Economic Forum ("WEF") Board of Trustees, Benioff co-founded 1t.org — the global movement to conserve, restore and grow one trillion trees — and the WEF Friends of Ocean Action. He also serves as the inaugural Chair of WEF's Forum Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution in San Francisco."

weforum.org/agenda/authors/marc-benioff

"Kennette M. Benedict
Marc Benioff
Andrew O. Bennett"

cfr.org/membership/roster

"Lynn Forester de Rothschild
,

Lynn Forester de Rothschild is CEO of EL Rothschild"

weforum.org/agenda/authors/lynn-forester-de-rothschild

Attached: marcbenioff.jpg (1200x1722, 276.29K)

Benioff says there is "no substitute for reducing our emissions". He says we must sequester 200 giga tons of carbon right now. Lol. Now he's talking about planting a trillion trees by 2030. Think of the trees, guys!!!

Now he's thanking Biden for signing the Replant Act which was part of the recent infrastructure bill which committed 8 billion dollars to planting and conserving trees in the U.S..

Now he's saying if he was starting over today, he and Bill Gates would be "ecopreneurs" not "tech entrepreneurs". Basically, the entire economy is going to be based around MUH CLIMATE CHANGE.

Attached: swedishinstituteofinternationalaffairs.jpg (500x500, 18.66K)

Mikael Damberg, Swedish Minister for Finance, says that he wants Sweden to be the first fossil fuel free welfare nation on the planet. Lol. Damberg also attended the Bilderberg Meeting in 2015 in Telfs-Buchen, Austria, by the way.

He says they're on track for their goals for 2030 but need to do more to reach their goals for 2045 net zero emissions and then "negative emissions". No more Burgers for us, fellow Americans! Damberg is on the steering committee for the First Mover Coalition. He's talking about how in 2020 there was the first fossil fuel steel plant pilot program in Sweden. He says this is the biggest shift in steel manufacturing in 1000 years. Very ambitious, Dammyberg!!

He says Sweden is an early leader in the use of fossil fuel free hydrogen. He calls this a "revolution".

Finally, Bradford Smith, the vice chairman and president of Microsoft, is speaking. He calls himself a "second joiner of the first movers", LOL. So funny!!! Everybody laughed!!!

He says even though he's competing with Alphabet and Salesforce, they're all sitting together on the same side of history. Now he's talking about carbon dioxide removal. He says we don't only need to reduce emissions but also remove emissions that are already in the atmosphere.

He says that the people working at Microsoft get a free admission at the Bill Gates School of Climate Science. Lol.

Attached: Bilderberg Group.jpg (3434x2959, 2.01M)

Now I'm watching the Youtube Witch herself, Susan Wojcicki. I doubt it, but I'll see if she says anything interesting.

Now I'm watching the Youtube Witch herself, Susan Wojcicki. I doubt it, but I'll see if she says anything interesting.

youtube.com/watch?v=Pi72kfigcL8

youtube.com/watch?v=Pi72kfigcL8

Attached: scenariosforthefutureoftechnologyandinternationaldevelopmentpic3.jpg (1159x1500, 147.11K)

The host is mentioning how youtube is one of the social media companies that Russia hasn't banned but they got demonetized, LOL. Susan says that youtube had a responsibility to block youtube channels associated with Russian state-funded Media. Of course, she mentioned that an event that denied the holocaust would be against youtube policies. If there was denial or trivialization of the war in Ukraine that would also be a violation. Got that, Chuds? If you don't think the war in Ukraine is the worst war in human history, you're violating violating youtube's terms of service.

So, she says it was their responsibility to make users could get authoritative and the right information. She's saying information can be weaponized. You don't say???

Anyway, she's saying that reason they haven't blocked Russia entirely is so that they can deliver independent news into Russia. Now she's getting asked if social media will become more nationalized and localized rather than globalized. She says she does expect to see more players.

They're talking about how China doesn't allow youtube to operate in their country and how they're creating competition like Tik Tok. Remember that the Lockstep portion of the Rockefeller Foundation's "Scenarios for the future of technology and international development paper" talked about the possibility of nations fracturing the internet to prevent the common people from communicating with foreign populations.

Attached: SusanWojcicki.jpg (1547x1863, 828.59K)

She's talking about short term videos growing tremendously, particularly with retarded Zoomers who have a goldfish attention span. She says creators like it a lot more. She also says short term content might get preferential treatment by the algorithm and have less of a chance of getting banned, lol. So basically steering people into being dumbed down with bite size entertainment.

She's talking about how people search youtube for products they might want to buy and how youtube is linking them to where they can buy these products.

Okay, now they're getting to misinformation, LOL. The factcheckers apparently found youtube to be a major conduit of fake news. Susan that they've investing a huge amount to fight misinformation. She's talking about 10 different policies they put in place about COVID misinformation. For example, banning people who said that COVID came from something other than a virus. And she brought up people destroying 5G equipment.

She's talking about raising up authoritative information regarding news, health and science. They're only recommending stuff that comes from a "trusted, well known publisher than can be reliable". I mean, we all knew this already but...

Now she's saying borderline content that meets their policy but is "lower quality", they will not recommend it. And of course, they only monetize not accurate information.

She says only 10 to 12 videos per 100,000 views that violate terms of service escape the moderation banhammer. So, basically, if you want to put truth on youtube, you better hope not too many people see it, lol. She also says that number of views has come down significantly and they plan to continue t reduce the amount of videos that slip through the cracks.

Attached: worldfederalistmovement.jpg (200x200, 6.66K)

Now they're talking about Roe v. Wade. Susan, of course, says that women should have a right to decide when they become a mother and reproductive rights are human rights. Lol, then she says that her company focuses on free speech and she wants to enable a broad set of opinions. That everybody has a right to express their point of view provided they adhere to youtube community's guidelines. Lol, she actually did say this while smiling.

Attached: AtlanticCouncil.png (259x194, 9.17K)

Don't forget about the Round Table Group network. The earliest Round Table Groups shadow governments like the Royal Institute of International Affairs in the UK and the Council on Foreign Relations in America were created in the 1920s and their origin of their network goes back to Nathan Rothschild and Cecil Rhodes in the late 1800s. There's one of these shadow governments in virtually every country now.

In fact, the World Economic Forum and all of these globalist institutions operate under "Chatham House Rule" secrecy that were designed by the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House). The WEF/Bilderberg/Atlantic Council/Trilateral Commission, etc, are all offshoots of the Round Table Group network.

For some reason, Any Forums largely ignores this network and focuses exclusively on the WEF. There's also the tax-exempt foundations like the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Open Society Foundations, etc.

There are thousands of think tanks just like the WEF that Any Forums never talks about. The World Government Summit, World Policy Conference, etc. The WEF is not the end all, be all.

“2. Observe the Chatham House Rule in all situations. All sessions of the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum abide by the Chatham House Rule, unless otherwise specified and notified as “on the record” or “open to the press.” The Chatham House Rule stipulates that: “When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.” We must ask all participants to respect “zero tolerance” with regard to violating this important community rule.”

www3.weforum.org/docs/AM13/WEF_AM13_CodeofConduct.pdf

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham_House_Rule

Attached: FrenchInstituteofInternationalRelations.jpg (400x158, 13.15K)

List of Threads:
Elite Bloodline Round Table Group Members
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/370693820/#q370745453

Open Society Foundations Information
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/369261705/#q369281550

Rockefeller Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and Rockefeller "Philanthropy" thread.
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/367027212/#q367028440

Memoryholed/Redpill Documentaries, Articles, Videos, etc
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/356397077/#q356397471

Elite Bloodline Central Banking Members
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/351931508/#q351931508

Attached: europeancouncilonforeignrelations.png (319x158, 6.88K)

Now I'm watching Satya Nadella, the CEO of Microsoft. Remember that Satya Nadella has been invited to Bilderberg Group meetings in the past. Klaus also said that Microsoft is one of the World Economic Forum's greatest partners and they're working together on over 36 initiatives. I already mentioned the First Mover Coalition earlier that Microsoft is a founding partner with.

He's talking about how the pandemic taught him about "caring" when it came to his leadership style. Microsoft put a management program in place right before the pandemic called "model, coach, care". He literally says "it was just great timing" because caring became the currency during the pandemic, lol.

These CEOs are so caring about all of us.

"Mundie, Craig J. (USA), President, Mundie & Associates
Nadella, Satya (USA), CEO, Microsoft
Netherlands, His Majesty the King of the (NLD)"

bilderbergmeetings.org/meetings/meeting-2019/participants-2019

Attached: SatyaNadella.jpg (330x422, 32.35K)

Klaus says that "brains is not enough, you need ze heart", LOL. All with a shit eating grin on his wrinkled face.

Now he's talking about The Cloud. He's saying The Cloud infrastructure is allowing Ukraine to continue to function during this war. Of course, it doesn't take a genius to realize that the cloud is a way for you to become even more removed from your data. So that it can all be memory holed in an instant as opposed to having that information on your own device (which can still be deleted through backdoors) or better yet having a physical copy.

He says 5G and space based technology is enabling NASA's infrastructure to operate more effectively. He's talking about how AI is now doing the work of 30% of the code of software development that formerly white color workers were doing manually. That'll be great for employment.

He's saying that having a AI co-pilot for every cognitive task is right within our grasp. And he's also talking about the digital and physical coming together with the Metaverse which we already talked about.

He's talking about how governments, corporations, civil society, the World Economic Forum and academia are working together (with Microsoft and Accenture) to create a model in the Metaverse for their gay ass One Trillion Trees initiative.

"You keep Ze Fruit un your han" says Klaus about the Metaverse fruit from the metaverse trees. This guy is a Lolcow, lol.

They're talking about regulations and privacy now. Nadella is saying it's inevitable given the constant presence of the digital world in our lives to "have stronger regulatory regimes around all facets of technology". He's saying a lot of safety and moderation regulation is coming out of the European Union which he says will set standards for the rest of the world.

Basically, he's saying now that they will design these technologies based on what they anticipate the regulations will be based on safety, privacy, AI ethics, etc.

Attached: australianinstituteofinternationalaffairs.jpg (193x200, 4.05K)

So basically, he's saying in not so many words that they will design to systems for the regulations that WEF politicians and Roundtable Group politicians will create on their behalf so that everything works seamlessly. Klaus calls it, "Adapting to regulation by design".

They're talking about Cyber Security and trust now. He says how much the WEF invested in terms of cyber security, lol. Yeah, I bet you have, Klausie!!!

Satya Nadella says the social purpose of the company has to have trust with the broader society. Since when do private corporations have a "social purpose"? I mean, obviously we know they do, but for centuries they've been telling us their only purpose is to make profit for their shareholders. So, basically, he's saying they need to make sure the public trusts these corporations as important stakeholders molding the world around them.

He's talking about making sure that they can debug biased Artificial Intelligence models so that bias doesn't get introduced in the first place.

He's also saying how these corporations can be used to protect various foreign governments that are under attack using Ukraine as his example.

Now Klaus is talking the WEF being involved in ESG metrics. Basically one of the trojan horses for a social credit system in the western world that organizations like the Centre for International Governance Innovation (part of the Canadian International Council) has written articles about wanting to achieve.

Now Nadella is talking about "what's the social purpose of a corporation" again. He says he does believe there is a social purpose of a corporation. He says it's to "create profitable solutions to the challenges of people and planet". He says Microsoft has a social contract with helping the local communities of every country and community it operates.

He says that the ESG is literally integrated into the core business model, not just something done on the side.

Attached: NetherlandsInstituteofInternationalRelationsClingendael.png (300x300, 11.5K)

Ugh, I'm gonna try to watch a panel titled, "Redefining Food Systems with Emerging Technologies", but it might give me too much anxiety. I started to get a little bit of anxiety when people start threatening to starve me. Kinda weird, huh?

youtube.com/watch?v=oLJESX1C_P8

Here's a post another user made.

Amongst other things, discussions of WEF at Devos this year have been:
>- "redefining" free speech and human rights (for the worst)
>- a new normal where the pills you take send out a signal that you have taken them
>- a digital passport with an individual carbon footprint tracker

> Proofs:
twitter.com/AndrewLawton/status/1528779966644731906
twitter.com/loffredojeremy/status/1527521228688445442
twitter.com/max_gagliardi/status/1529069996411916290

Attached: argentinecouncilforinternationalrelations.jpg (324x156, 4.04K)

This credit card has a carbon-emission spending limit by Charlotte Edmond on May 13, 2019 at weforum.com:
weforum.org/agenda/2019/05/this-credit-card-has-a-carbon-emission-spending-limit/

From bananas and sausages to flights and fuel, we all like to keep a tally of what we spend. But whether we monitor the price in dollars, rupees or yuan, it’s unlikely we are also measuring that cost in tons of carbon produced.

Everything we put in our shopping basket comes at an environmental cost. And while many of us are aware that we need to reduce our carbon footprint, advice on doing so can seem nebulous and keeping a tab is difficult.

Tapping into that problem, Swedish fintech company Doconomy has launched a new credit card that monitors the carbon footprint of its customers - and cuts off their spending when they hit their carbon max.

The DO card tracks the CO2 emissions linked to purchases to calculate the carbon impact of every transaction. The aim is to encourage people to actively reduce their carbon footprint and demonstrate the impact that small changes can have on the environment.

The card uses the Aland Index as the basis on which it calculates the carbon footprint of each product purchased. Users can set a maximum value for their carbon spend and learn how to compensate for their carbon footprint by contributing towards schemes to reduce or remove greenhouse gas emissions.

A savings product also offered by the company offers an interest rate that includes investment in climate-friendly projects.

The card itself is made from bio-sourced materials, and printed with air ink - ink manufactured from recycled carbon in air pollution.

Doing good, one scoop at a time

The concept of offsetting carbon at the point of transaction is one that is slowly being picked up by companies. A number of airlines including Qantas and Lufthansa offer passengers the chance to pay extra to cover their carbon emissions, with limited uptake.

Attached: austrianinstituteofinternationalaffairs.jpg (387x130, 9.37K)

So, basically they're just going on about how 700 million people in the world are hungry and that António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, says that millions could be on the verge of famine in the coming months. Let's all keep our fingers crossed that it isn't us, Any Forums!!! Anyway, they're basically using the excuse of both the war in Ukraine and MUH climate change as a reason why food prices and distribution problems are leading us into a crisis.

They're saying we need they have a challenge between producing food and solving environmental challenges because innovations in agricultural and food production has previously come at a cost to the environment. Basically, we're all eating too much, and it's destroying the earth.

They're blaming land holdings becoming smaller for one of the reasons India has a good crisis, lol. It's the small businesses, guys. It's not Bayer/Monsanto, the lockdowns, the massive global money printing, etc. Fuck these guys so hard.

So, Mansukh Mandaviya - the Minister of Health, Family Welfare and Chemicals and Fertilizers of India - is talking about doubling the income of farmers through government subsidies. I don't know, it's hard to understand the guy through his accent and broken English.

They're asking him why India doesn't export its wheat to Africa to save them from famine.

Mandaviya is basically saying they've already done enough distributing medicine during the COVID crisis and maybe they'll grow my wheat or something, lol.

Now a representative of Nestle is talking. She's talking about Nestle implementing a climate road map and regenerative agriculture. They want 20% of their raw materials sourced through regenerative agriculture by 2025, 50% by 2030 and 100% by 2050. She says this can be done by satellite remote technology in the soil to detect soil technology. She's also mentioning on digital sensors.

Attached: worldbank.jpg (500x500, 49.31K)

Now she's talking about public blockchain and QR code to follow the production of foods in the Congo from harvest all the way to the final product.

lol, she's now saying that payments will be given half to the male person of the household and half to the female person of the household. Clever girl, subverting the husband farmer's authority. Of course, being done through mobile payment which fits into the cashless society agenda.

It seems like they're implying that farmers should be paid according to the methods of farming that contribute to the general good rather than the particular yield of what they produce. They also want to use sensors to detect how much carbon is being produced during each part of the farming process.

This sounds like a great way to shut down small farms who are unable to meet new "carbon regulations". Well, I'd think that if I was a "conspiracy theorist" at least.

They want international standards on farming.

Mandaviya is talking about farmer cooperatives that help "small and marginal farmers" afford detection based technology that they otherwise couldn't afford. I know this is an old system in India, but it seems like this could very easily be morphed into a new public-private "collectivization" system if small farmers are completely dependent on these cooperatives to survive.

Okay, now this guy is asking the panel about how we already have enough food to feed the planet. So instead of producing more and more while depleting the soil, we should reduce meat production (There it is!) so we have more food for everyone.

They're advocating for more regional food production. Which I actually agree with for once. We should all be less interdependent on other countries. But I doubt he means in it in the way that I would want it to be. Yeah, now he's talking about meeting the Paris agreement targets.

Attached: nigerianinstituteofinternationalaffairs.gif (512x94, 8.79K)

Ishmael Sunga (Chief Executive Officer, Southern African Confederation of Agricultural Unions) is blaming sustenance farmer and lack of infrastructure for why there's so much waste in food production. So basically we need more digital technology to determine what the farmers need to solve this problem. So more surveillance of small farmers, basically. Great. Thanks, asshole.

Attached: ElcanoRoyalInstitute.png (310x120, 6.79K)

Ishmael Sunga (Chief Executive Officer, Southern African Confederation of Agricultural Unions) is blaming sustenance farmer and lack of infrastructure for why there's so much waste in food production. So basically we need more digital technology to determine what the farmers need to solve this problem. So more surveillance of small farmers, basically. Great. Thanks, asshole.

Attached: norwegianinstituteofinternationalaffairs.png (826x236, 21.54K)