The U.S constitution and the value given to it today has to be the dumbest thing I ever saw...

i agree the law when it was written didnt account for the fact that your mother deserves to be raped so its legal for me to rape her now.

The country already collapsed. You have niggers and faggots basically ruling the country and if you dare say something your entire life will be torn to pieces while you stand and watch unable to do anything. All of this happened and you are still holding on to a a shit bunch of paper defending it with all your soul.

glauben sie das wir verrückt bin?

>wir
>bin

Attached: sein.jpg (1280x720, 58.3K)

Oh the irony... Multiple levels to it too kek

Attached: SOON.png (1200x631, 793.95K)

nobody cares

>"dumbest thing i ever saw"
ever look in a mirror, satellite state?

The Kraut is right. To quote Francis Parker Yockey's Magnum Opus, Imperium: The Philosophy of History and Politics:
>The Declaration of Independence is saturated with the thinking of Rousseau and Montesquieu. The basic idea, as in all Rationalism, is the equating of what ought to be with what will be. Rationalism begins with confusing the rational with the real, and ends by confusing the real with the rational. This arsenal of “truths” about equality, inalienable and inherent rights, reflects the emancipated critical spirit, devoid of respect for facts and tradition. The idea that governments are “instituted” for a utilitarian purpose, to satisfy a demand of “equal” men, and that these “equal” men give their “consent” to a certain “form” of “government,” and then abolish it when it no longer serves the purpose — is pure Rationalistic poetry, and corresponds to no facts that have ever occurred anywhere. The source of government is the inequality of men — this is the fact. The nature of the government is a reflection of the Culture, the Nation, and the stage of development of both. Thus any nation may have one of two forms of government, an efficient or an inefficient government. An efficient government carries out the Idea of the nation — not the “will of the masses,” for this latter does not exist if the leadership is capable. Leadership goes down, not when “the people” rationally decide to abolish it, but when that leadership becomes so decadent as to undermine itself. No government anywhere is “founded” on “principles.” Governments are the expression of political instincts, and the difference between the instincts of various populations is the source of differences in their practice of government. No written “principles” affect the practice of government in the slightest, and the sole effect they have is to furnish the vocabulary of political struggles.
Sauce:
han.gl/WvExo

Attached: 1632162284215.jpg (1440x1800, 190.83K)

The American mindset is "I serve the jew and I am proud." Germany and USA are both jewish states and we are here because of the actions of your grandfather the kike nigger lover.

Besides the Jews, I blame the Eternal Anglo more than anyone else (barring the turbo-kikes) for WWI & II. Mitchell Heisman (literal) Suicide Note contains an excellent critical overview & analysis on the often-forgotten and always-discarded phenomenon of the Norman Conquest and eventual total emasculation of the Anglo Saxon post-1066.
>World War Two on the Western front can be viewed as the struggle between two kinds of freedom: German collective (racial or völkisch) freedom and Anglo-Saxon individual freedom. Individual freedom is realized at the price of racial freedom. Liberty for kin selective interests is lost through the liberty to realize individual interests. The individualistic Western conscience represses human sociobiological development, just as it liberates individual development. If there exists a lack of willingness to sacrifice freedom as individuals for the race, the race will be sacrificed for individuals.

>...American history is a demonstration that the two freedoms are not created equal. The race is enslaved through the love of individual liberty, and individual freedom is bought at the price of the collective liberty of the race. What unites Americans is what separates Americans: the lack of any necessary bonds to one another is freedom for the individual via freedom from one another.

Mitchell Heisman's Suicide Note:
legacy.gscdn.nl/archives/images/suicide_note.pdf

Attached: 1285558940_3073.jpg (200x262, 20.78K)

Thank you for providing good insights with sources. It's very rare to have an American do this.

Some more choice quotes from the late, based, topwit Mischling Jew, Mitchell Heisman (why is it half-Jews are amongst my favorite writers of all-time?? Mitchell Heisman, Otto Weininger, Arno Schickedanz, Gerard Menuhin, Bobby Fischer, etc.)
>The kin selective interest lost through the creation of the consequent genetic Esperanto called humanity is not something that can be undone. One way or another, kinship and race thus exert their significance. In this case, ethnic diversity and racial miscegenation helps preserve the cause of individual freedom via genetic enslavement to individual freedom. The consequences of individual freedom subvert freedom to choose alternatives to individual freedom.

>American history can thus be viewed as the slow but sure progress of the death of a kind of freedom. In expanding one kind of freedom as individuals, Anglo-Saxons finished and buried a different kind of freedom stolen from them in 1066. Individual freedom compensated for the collective ethnic freedom usurped by the Norman immigrants. [...]

>Weimar Germany, like the Anglo-Saxons in revolt immediately after 1066, had not yet adapted to reduction to ethnic defeat. They still maintained their integrity as a Volk, unreduced to a folk. The Anglo-Saxon dismissed the political holism that survived among the Germans precisely because this view revealed their emasculation as a racial body. This is why individualism, originally an outlet for Anglo-Saxon male pride in the face of the feminization of their race, ultimately decomposed into an even more radical form of feminism. The feminism of Anglo-Saxon females was a logical consequence of the feminization of Anglo-Saxon males as representatives of a racial body. The race is enslaved by a love of liberty as individuals. Like a female slave, she accepts her place, accepting that she has no right to determine her destiny. If others wish to penetrate the boundaries of her body, she has no right to resist.

Attached: 1620267056678 (4).jpg (1809x1588, 2.27M)

Seeing what we were and what we are honestly breaks my heart.

The process of changing it are established within it.