the Germans were not as good in World War 2 than you people think to believe.
Change my mind.
The Germans were not as good in World War 2 than you people think to believe
Other urls found in this thread:
ihr.org
ihr.org
ihr.org
youtu.be
amazon.com
amazon.com
colchestercollection.com
amazon.com
amazon.com
amazon.com
colchestercollection.com
de.m.wikipedia.org
ostarapublications.com
ostarapublications.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
They were the best as far as tech goes but they had too many enemies and a crazy dude leading them
Yeah bro madman druggie Hitler was 100% responsible for the downfall of Germany from 1939 onwards.
ihr.org
Soviet Scorched-Earth Warfare: Facts And Consequences
ihr.org
Stalin's War Against His Own Troops
The Tragic Fate of Soviet Prisoners of War in German Captivity
ihr.org
Why Germany Attacked the Soviet Union
Germany's economic preparations for waramazon.com
Germany's Economic Preparations for Waramazon.com
colchestercollection.com
Major Jordan's Diaryamazon.com
From Major's Jordan's Diariesamazon.com
From Major Jordan's Diaries ~ The inside story of Soviet lend-lease -- from Washington to Great Falls to Moscowamazon.com
colchestercollection.com
de.m.wikipedia.org
Friedrich Stieve
ostarapublications.com
Der Untermensch / The Underman in English and German by Jupp Daehler
ostarapublications.com
What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers 1933–1940 by Friedrich Stieve
literal retards
Didn't say that but ok
they were. proof at 1:14 in the vid. holy shit muh canned meat filters.
>vk.
>com/video-188580735_456244443
This raight hyah folhks is hwat you call a glow datamining thread.
Go to /his/ fag
Yeah, ok commie filth
that was only true at the start because their army was brand new. but they got outclassed pretty quickly. the bf 109 got outclassed by the spitfire and p-51. the panzer 4 was outclassed by the t-34. the tiger was outclassed by the IS-2. the only technological advantage that the Germans really held onto till the end of the war was their infantry small arms fire.
They were a country the size of Texas fighting three Jewish empires.
They were the best at honest warfare. They were undone by dishonest warfare where allies and Russians sent their people into the meat grinder to die by the millions until sheer numbers overwhelmed the Germans.
we will overcome
wasn't talking to you then
They were outnumbered by several hundreds of millions, ran out of resources like rubber, just like the Japs with oil, ect.. and from the start knew they could only win a quick victory. Just like the Japs in saying they could run wild for 6 months, but if it wasn't done by then, they'd lose. They knew they were going to lose probably by 43. Just made them do desperate stuff in the mid game, to try to force nations out of the war.
>ummm they were maybe not quite as good as some people may think
can you at least come up with an opinion before wasting catalog space on a thread like this
I was the one who let you know
Datamine deez nuts glowniggers.
I don't even pay for a VPN, come and get me.
Yeah they were, pretty much won every battle before lend lease crushed them with sheer momentum of the industrial machine of the US combined with USSR, Germany punched so far above its weight under natsoc its kinda crazy
Germany still lost because they had an over-supply of enemies, an undersupply of armaments, and an undersupply of fuel, and they were technologically outclassed by their opponents who also outproduced them. Germany never stood a chance. Napoleon got to Moscow, but the Germans never even entered the city.
he ruined nationalism for everyone else
>the Germans were not as good in World War 2 than you people think to believe.
>Change my mind.
They actually were given what they were up against and their insufficient access to resources.
Germany had no attrition. the war economy was pathetic
go go go
youtube.com
I am an ESL teacher, changkoro. Can I help you?
Also, I'm still bitter that the wrong side won the war.
Neither was right
until Now
I have interviewed anonymously 50 thousand human beings
I'm not sure what you mean by they had no attrition, their war economy was limited since they had no natural resources like the vast empires Germany was fighting, US and USSR had unlimited resources and for example could use high quality fuel when Germany couldn't but still it took years to turn the tide of war, many economists of the time agreed that what Hitler did in Germany was nothing short of a economic miracle
Germany and its aligned states fought for a fetid and depraved cause. The world would have been plunged into a new dark age if Germany won.
you're actually right, but they were decent and not at all the worst army. They suffered from Hitlers micromanagement and logistical issues. They had a crappy economy design as well as too many different types of vehicles and parts. It wasnt streamlined
Now on behalf of my government
we are launching a hostile take over
One of their downfalls was lack of oil.
uhhhh
they lost dude
What do you mean? Nationalism and removing jewish oppression from Europe was the most noble of all the causes there are
I understand you might not comprehend what is about to occur
but we have taken control of your nuclear facilities in Area51
They lost because they showed mercy to those who deserved none.
Correct
attrition involves fuel. its like you loose a tank in a devotion and its your ability to replace said tank. it was not just natural resources. germany also had terribly inefficient factories
I see you are a realist
Then allow me to be Frank
On 9/11 my species destroyed the world trade networks