I've seen this bridge crossing being reported a lot as a "Russian bridge crossing disaster". Can someone explain if those are Russian vehicles, why are there no Z/V/O markings on the vehicles?
Bridge crossing failure
shhhh don't ask the scary questions
Well it seems they’re completely destroyed so it looks like they got burned off.
those are ukranian tanks
Top one looks intact, and we've seen enough Russian tanks with markings before haven't we?
Fire melts cheap spray paint retard
Does it tho?
This has to be the stupidest post on the internet, ever.
They went through WATER. WATER, user. All markings were washed off.
Russians invented amphibious T-72? (Or whatever their name is)
Low-quality photos and lightning, it is not that easy to distinguish.
You can see some markings on the back, slightly.
>cherrypicks the worst quality image of burnt tanks
>wonders why he can't see markings
if you'd look up other sources appart from this shitty board infested with vatnigger shills spamming the same shitty ass fake propaganda you'd find the answer to your questions
It's part of a massive combined arms battle for that crossing that lasted 5 days.
More than 90 armored vehicles we're destroyed from both sides, mainly by artillery.
Ultimately the Russians won the battle and crossed, but it was a costly fight for both sides.
Vatniggers can’t stop coping. Next you’ll ask what brand of cigarettes sunk the Moskva
COPE
YOU
LOST
THE
COLD
WAR
AND
YOU
WILL
LOSE
THE
UKRAINE
WAR
NIGGER
MONGOL
RAPE
BABY
yes, it does, where are the markings on the turret and sides? those are the most burnt parts too
Military markings are not done with chalk you utter retard.
This crossing has been analyzed to death on Russian military forums. Most of the vehicles there are Ukrainian ones (T-64, BMP-1, medevac MTLB etc), some are Russian. But we don't know the exact ratio of losses. It's one of the biggest tank battles ever since WW2.
yeah you're talking shit no ukrainian troops were there all those vehicles were shot down by artillery fire and are all russian, after this failed attempt they tried somewhere else to cross the river
nigger
>analyzed to death on Russian military forums
cooooope those are not even t-64 you retarded vatnigger and bmp-1 have been seen in use by the russian army since the begining of the invasion pic rel
These are very clear, but apparently from another place? Higher photo from the place of my original picture doesn't show any tanks with only turrets out of the water.
I chose the closest picture from this bridge crossing which was widely shared in media. Yours is apparently from another.
>Comparing a shaky photo taken by drone from afar that is 768x768 pixels where the tank makes up only 10% of the photo, to a high resolution 1200x674 steady photo where the tank is directly in front of the camera, takes up 60% of the photo, and has a faint, barely visible V on the front.
The correct answer is you’re a moron.
The copeless response is that theres losses on both sides. Are the ukrainian losses higher? probably.
it's not another it's just a different time the russians tried to cross this river 3 times and failed everytime
>Phosphorescent - Chernobyl assault group
They're fucking rare. In the insanely small chance that like 20% of all the russian BMP-1s still in use were lost in the crossing, what do you say about the clearly ukrainian truck?
Here's a shaky photo taken by drone from afar that is 768x768 PX where the tank makes up only 10 of the screen and you can still see an O.
That's no excuse, is it?
Oops forgot pic. Btw picture from YouTube vídeo through YouTube's compression
this one?
No you faggot, the ukrainian truck. Yes there were russian losses in the crossing, no one's denying that.