Accusation of the century ladies & gentlemen

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of wanting to "return to a world order in which strength dictates what is right." "We cannot allow Putin to win this war," he stressed.
dw.com/en/putin-must-not-win-this-war-germanys-olaf-scholz-tells-davos/a-61938607
It would be sooooo bad if we reverted back to a world where the weak fear the strong!
What would hypocrites & cowardly 2-faced pieces of shit do?
We cannot allow it.
/s

Attached: 1652736392062.jpg (640x552, 43.79K)

>"return to a world order in which strength dictates what is right."
Honestly, this is a good thing.

Like this is not my ideal world, but it's way better than what Olfag Swhob probably stands for.

this is how the universe intended it...

it depends but here's the thing. You need the strong to endorse your policies. If they hate your policies well guess what? They're strong so... that's where disrespecting the strong and even trying to treat them worse than others because of their strength, this cannot be a viable policy. Strength has its advantages, and although we would like to say it's not the case, the strong will always prevail.

>If they hate your policies well guess what? They're strong so
Kind of true. Especially if you make some people on the military angry.

Either way strong people are usually courageous since their strength allows for them to be something other than a coward and a lying scumbag.
That's the beauty about strength, it allows you to enforce your policy.
Ain't that great? Lying 2-faced pony soldiers are not strong because the strong are at ease with the truth.
Your empire of lies is crumbling and I am stronger than ever.

This desu. All that is good will survive, everyone who cucked to the judeo-bolshevik system will perish.

Pretty good deal.

Strength dictates what's right hmm?
Strange words from Putin who has no strength at all.

Attached: QyqRQrHZhKC3T1sd.jpg (988x720, 76.11K)

This is true. Not being afraid of consequences and being able to enforce your will plays a lot in this. Weak people are rarely like that. However, a weak man who has nothing to lose can be dangerous. Rulers usually leave some bait for weak people so they feel like they have something to lose. This way they continue to live worried with fear.

Well, he is retarded.

>a weak man who has nothing to lose can be dangerous
I think you meant a strong man who has nothing to lose is dangerous. Weak people are never dangerous. Which is why their policy cannot be enforced by themselves.

>I think you meant a strong man who has nothing to lose is dangerous.
I meant that. I think we have different views of what is a weak man . There is people who is harmless most of the time and very fearful. I consider that kind of people weak, but I recognise that some of them may poss a threat when they have nothing to lose. Why would someone fear of anything if they have nothing left to live for? Only an absolute coward would keep being in fear. So I guess, weak people for you means absolute cowards.

>weak people for you means absolute cowards
one cannot go without the other. The reason that people develop into cowards is because they live through multiple attempts at enforcing their policy and fail. They fail because they are not strong enough to enforce their policy.
This in turn prevents them from achieving any of the arcane wisdoms that the strong acquire early in life, such as courage, truthseeking, patience, discipline.

>Weak people are never dangerous.
Anyone can be dangerous honestly. You are right in the fact that weak people can't enforce their will.

So if I’m stronger than you I can fuck your ass and you should just learn to fear my power and do what I want?

>Anyone can be dangerous honestly.
ok let me ask you this...
I've trained for this my entire life.
I'm not only strong. I'm persuasive, relaxed, I seem like I'm not a threat to the weak. They like me. A weak angry person willing to harm others would be pitting herself against me, a strong focused person who harms others at will.
Not only that, I HOPE someone tries to harm me so I can unleash.
So if all of my other strategies fail and a weak person still intends to hurt me, they would get killed, probably without me sustaining any damage.
That is because my brain is wired entirely for warfare while the weak person's brain is wired for pleasure.
In my case, killing someone might actually be the thing that brings me the most pleasure, although that is still a hypothetical at present time.

>all time high gas prices
>food shortage
>russia wiping the floor with ukies
>russia decreases interest rates
>rouble is strongest ccy in the world by far
>fully self sufficient in all key things - food / resources / energy/ millitary
>putin rating all time high
>biden rating all time low

Lol at this coping faggot.

Aww doggy is sooo cute.
This is why I come here. Doggie and cat pics.

>ok let me ask you this....
>doesn't ask anything lol

We all have blind moments, where we are vulnerable. Even strong people. You don't have eyes on your back, you are not conscious while sleeping and you cannot always control what ends up in your food. Once weak people lose everything they can become dangerous to whoever is arround them.

>You don't have eyes on your back, you are not conscious while sleeping and you cannot always control what ends up in your food.
I always keep an eye on my surroundings, which is rule #1. The entire game is "how do I kill you without this other person killing me?". The goal is to inflict as much damage as possible while taking as little damage as possible. Additionally, there is no way to enter my home without waking me up, and yes I actually do control what ends up in my food unless they plan on poisoning the general population.

When did this rule stop being true?