Liberals believe they must disarm themselves in order to disarm their enemies

Liberals believe they must disarm themselves in order to disarm their enemies.
Conservatives believe they must arm their enemies in order to arm themselves.

Who's in the right here?

Attached: 1309893081.png (995x540, 889.91K)

both need to be shot when the right time comes

If your enemy is armed then it’s a fair fight and no one will be upset about the outcome.

Who cares, they're both American and should be disregarded.

>Liberals believe they must disarm themselves in order to disarm their enemies
They actually don't believe that. They only want the government to have guns, which they're allied with. They would love nothing more than the government to kick in your door and kill your family for dissenting opinions.

Name one country in the world were criminals DO NOT have firearms. You can't.

Liberals also believe if your enemy kills you, you win. Civ war 2 shouldn't take but a couple of months

Why limp wristed troons want to have civil war with real men who spent their whole lives shooting and hunting I'll never know. Mental illness I suppose.

Yup, I oversimplified it a bit.
Liberals want their friends to be armed, and their enemies disarmed.
It seems conservatives do not share this view, believing that it's impossible to disarm their enemies without disarming themselves. Haven't liberals already done that in many places? Or do you think eventually it will backfire on them?

>Haven't liberals already done that in many places?
NYC being one of those places. Only the rich and politicians are issued carry permits in the city. It will eventually backfire on them. It always does. Picrel.

Attached: 8511910549_d0b02982e6_b.jpg (654x1024, 212.13K)

If you cannot disarm your enemies you cannot disarm mine.
If you can disarm your enemies, do it, and then their would be no need for a government.

We have bears up here.

Attached: DSCN1723.jpg (3264x2448, 1.75M)

Dead children

me. I'm in the right.
>arm myself
>disarm my enemies and kill them (both liberals and conservatives are my enemies)

I just don't like it when wolves or coyotes come onto my property

best argument for gun ownership itt

Maybe just get rid of the assault rifles? Realistically, when are you ever gonna be in a self-defence situation where you need to take out 30 people at once? John Wick wannabes

Attached: sq6itma1ma871.jpg (474x479, 35.75K)

Around Blacks, Never Relax

>assault rifles
Tits or GTFO

Guns allow weak men to feel powerful. It's anti-natural, thus liberal. All the atheist revolutions were due to the peasants having guns. And that's since the 1800s.

History went to shit when guns were used. It's a fact. Real men used swords, but with guns the peasants felt they were knights and this removed the boundary between the alpha aristocracy with the beta men.

You own a gun? then you are a liberal. Simple as.

you believe in making shit threads and you're a faggot

Shooter was a Russian asset recruited recently in order to take the news media spotlight away from Ukraine. This is GRU special ops mandate 3601 signature. Ordered by Putin.

The autist phenotype has technical stats.

Attached: Simon_Baron-Cohen.jpg (2283x2823, 911.51K)

how do we go back to that natural state? Do we need to wait for some technological development that makes guns obsolete?