Defend this MAGAtards!!!
msn.com
GUNS BANNED AT TRUMP NRA SPEECH
WTF? When did criminals ever follow laws? Guns need to be allowed so a good guy with a gun could stop a filthy DemonKKKrat from killing Trump.
Can you post his thesis rather than advertise for msn?
Guns are never allowed at an event where the secret service is present.
You’re doing them a favor by lowering the potential threat level and they will be better security than you would he anyway
...
Holy shitting Cope of Copes
Shall not be infringed my dude get with it
it's a private establishment. how is this an issue?
Also
Trump CONFIRMS he will attend the NRA convention in Houston on Friday but attendees WON'T be able to bring in their guns: Says we 'need real solutions and real leadership, not politicians and partisanship' after the Uvalde massacre
'America needs real solutions and real leadership in this moment, not politicians and partisanship,' Trump said on his app Truth Social.
Some conservatives have voiced disapproval of the move, including the decision by the NRA to only allow fully vaccinated individuals into the conference. One user of Truth Social commented "It's a disgrace, what happened to our body our choice Mr Trump? You need to tell the NRA what they can and can't do," another supporter complained that "Gun free zones at the NRA makes everyone unsafe. The only 'govt' I trust is 45-70!"
>You don't have any "private" rights goyim! Read our Constitution
>Only the proper authorities should be allowed to have guns, the public being armed makes us unsafe!
Where have I heard that before.
Isn't this normal? Guns checked at the door of convention and in work places in Texas?
>Democrat politicians want to abolish police
>Still walk around with armed security
Yawn. Try harder.
Yes it is very normal to give up your constitutional rights it's actually patriotic
I had high hopes for trump but ultimately he is a grabber, a swamp rat, a fudd, and a pawn of Israel
I’m glad no one likes the NRA anymore and they’ll die with the boomers. GOa is where it’s at
The Secret Service is there to shoot and kill any threat.
They have the entire place surrounded. It’s an issue of logistics.
Would you rather not have a gun in a place surrounded by armed law enforcement who are under orders to shoot anyone who pulls a weapon without questions or would you rather have a gun on you and make things more difficult for them when trying to keep the event safe by causing confusion about who is a threat and who isn’t?
This isn’t the same thing as an elementary school. It’s not a soft target.
>(((NRA)))
Im happy they're dying Im more of a GOA guy frankly
constant threats against NRA by leftist wackos, why dey ban guns user, checkmate user, get fucked
>NRA wants to 'defend the 2nd amendment'
>Disarms citizens at its events and only lets the authorities have guns because 'it makes us safer'
That's right having guns doesn't make anyone safer good point Shmuel .3 shekels have been deposited to your kibbutz
>democrats say they believe in free speech
>cheer when trump is banned from twitter
hmm
My company does not allow me to carry on campus. I have gotten into it with HR over this and almost lost my job.
What’s worse is the training they give you. They tell you to hide under your desk like it’s a fucking tornado.
I know you are just being a disingenuous cocksucker, but kill yourself anyways.
I want to know how you can tell me this isn't a contradiction. It is no different to leftists saying 'only the police and the state should have guns, not private citizens'. If that's the case then do the leftists have an argument for doing the exact same thing elsewhere too?
I'm not debating if it works or if it doesn't, I'm pushing a Socratic line of questioning because it gets to the core of the issue.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED LIBTARD
Why wouldn't you want Trump to have the extra protection of people with guns in the crowd?