/jdt/ - the NEUMEISTER edition

amberturds, it's over

sweating rn

who /deuxmoi/ here

wow, so this guy is saying that since the photos were VIEWED and then screen grabbed or rendered from an application that COULD manipulate photo: Like Almost ALL photo viewing applications; so it's suspect.

Then ALL photos we ever see ever on a computer are going to be suspect, unless we were literally looking ON her phone, in saved photos. Face palm.

Lethality

Attached: Watercardboard.png (200x251, 113.41K)

Who or what the fuck is Deuxmoi?

When will normies learn about meta data??

THIS WIZARD NIGGERS JUST DESTROYED AMBERS ENTIRE CASE LMAO

Attached: 1427410449746.jpg (250x95, 7.81K)

I cant belive I'm witnessing this in 4k

boomer with a computer. most dangerous enemy of NWO

Had some work meetings- how was the TMZ shit bros?

Attached: 1652811911901.png (1043x1043, 643.18K)

Its not the original photo since it was probably sent a few times between idiots that have no idea how tech works

WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO PROVE HERE?

THIS SI GOING NOWHERE

Attached: 1653485738123.png (366x396, 170.83K)

Gamer Moment

>2016
>iphone6
lul

>What, if any, dinner did you eat last night?
>What if any muffins were included in the meal?
>it's a yes or no question. Yes or No
>no further questions

at most they'll claim she adjusted contrast and saturation a bit, not much else to do

Is this photo edited, bros?

Attached: 20220517_181349.jpg (4032x3024, 2.25M)

Doesn't matter, any edited photo should not be regarded as evidence for the possibility of tampering.

>video came from amber because it took 15 minutes to get copyright
>many of ambers pictures have been edited multiple times on computers

johnny was bad on the stand but i think we recovered today bros

keep seething trannoid

>Mr Norbert, you're not an expert at taking photos, correct?

This guy is saying a bunch of nothing, data can change through a lot of different processes. file sizes can be different if she sent them through an app and then recovered them and/or if she used different app cameras to take the photo or maybe she cropped the images, resized the file, etc. Unless he's showing editing on the bruises then he's not saying anything, and there's way to demonstrate that editing of the pixels but I don't think that's even on his realm.

Deppbros, we're back

Attached: 1653410191837.gif (220x371, 901.37K)

The canadian user has really evolved. He is getting the reddit posts from the femcels and posting here for (You)s.
Pretty smart.

this desu

>leaf still larping as an amber simp

give it up already

Back to r*ddit you muttfaggot

Best tv I've seen since Die Hard 1

he will show that amber edited her turd photo to make it look extra dark and nasty

>its the same photo at a different time of day
so, perjury verdict for amber heard?

The ending of cross was absolutely amazing, watch it without having it spoiled here

I hope the jury understand what this all means and connect the dots and not ignore it due to technical jargon.

>leaked to TMZ despite saying she didn't
>edited images
AMBER IS DONE

>johnny was bad on the stand but i think we recovered today bros
He really wasn't.

Housewives that have nothing better to do than cheer for Heard

NOOOO HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN MY FELLOW TURDSISTERS????

BRUH

Attached: file.png (773x702, 337.75K)

>15 posts in the last thread
>already 2 posts in this thread

>Seed to Feed
Suck to Fuck

Just fucking overlap those two pictures already.

It's not a "clear bruise". It looks like the way your face looks when you fall asleep on your hand. What are you smoking

>Iphone

Attached: satania-laugh.gif (498x488, 664.72K)

to show you guys what a boomer this guy is
here's an image from his linkedin page I just found
unfortunately it's very small and I dont have linked in, but look at this fucking guy

Attached: 1625532046023.jpg (200x200, 14.35K)

AH getting charged for perjury

that was a nice jiggie
kino, gamer man took down elaine a notch

last jiggy went coolio

Attached: winiwnn.png (1386x915, 2.68M)

She said they were 2 diferent photos in diferent days.

It was a rocky start Deppsisters but we made a fantastic comeback to take the W home.

Attached: 1653497626568.png (487x512, 153.21K)

They will 100% say that the programs she used to take photos automatically changed things like saturation, and that those photos are still indicative of reality. You'll see.

But he's also actively arguing with people
Impressive level of retardation honestly, I would love to see how that type of person looks in real life

You are a one dedicated nigga, give you that

Another highlight. Like top 3. Watch it.

>leaf
>larping
nah. He's just a fag in a dress.

yes, there was previously an
>N
between the "s" and "e" in the word "seed"

Hey Bashar

>Amber edited the pics in basic image editing software and then testified that they were unedited under oath
Is she retarded?

itoddlers lose again

Ill rewind later. Thanks based floppy fish bro.

Fantastic

Motion to put my penis inside Amber Heard vagina, Your Honor

Attached: 1560684151236.jpg (976x850, 57.91K)

editing images in Photos 3.0

Attached: 165270938344.jpg (520x547, 44.44K)

>AH getting charged for perjury
Nah.
>last jiggy went coolio
I like when they are hidden.

the photos were saved in the photo editing program, to change the EXIF data, therefore they were potentially tampered with
unless Amber is in fact 500IQ to reverse Uno capture the ace in the chess board and edited the EXIF manually

BOOBA?

Attached: 11.png (586x508, 310.32K)

Imagine working in Hollywood, having dozens of connections to editors etc... and still comitting amateur mistakes. She could have atleast asked someone shes working with.

depends, the jury aged 20-50 probably is aware of whats going on but if theres anyone above 50 they probably are asleep

Tell them it was the same photo

Unironically the biggest chad in this trial, see

Femcel sub with 250 roasties being platformed in these threads to piss you off.

Amazing. Go see it.

>itoddlers unironically, unequivocally, undeniably
>B T F O

yes

IM GONNA COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMM

Attached: 1653492880148.jpg (2174x967, 1.14M)

bass

Ain't no smile left on that face and no smug staring

What program is Photos 3.0?

There are two leafs posting in this thread. One is a simp for a abusive cunts who shit in beds and admit to violence on tape numerous times and has had chrages filed against them for said abuse ans who then cries vitim in the wake of mee too all the while being a wreteched hypocratic piece of shit and a liar. The other is me.

>she didn't remove exif

Is this guy sure Apple doesn't tag it like that when someone takes a picture?

This is really bad for Turd.

>when you see Photos 3.0 you know it's not anywhere close to original
Well that's game isn't it? Phonefags btfo forever eternally.
t. phonefag

any lawanons know how much trouble Amber can get into for editing photos and claiming they are originals?

And what does Heard's side have?
>Y-YOU SENT SOME MEAN TEXTS :(((

Attached: delightfully devlish.jpg (225x225, 10.2K)

If they're smart they won't cross. IDK why her team feels the need to cross every single witness

Remember.
Robo-puss.
jigex.com/VjV9i
jigex.com/VjV9i

He might be working up to that

All photos edited

Attached: +_367.png (625x625, 87.83K)

unlike this "Mr Schnell" this guy seems actually competent,
seriously the thing "Schnell" did were so embarrissing, any 4chins autist could do what he did with just some tendies

Sustained.

rare paypay

Pure kino.

Attached: 1651710003911.png (200x200, 44.31K)

Hes an expert on metadata and shit, I doubt hed make a mistake like that

Does this even really prove much? Seems like the jury would get bored?

Attached: 4046.jpg (1200x1200, 83.49K)

Do I get paid if I switch side and become Ambersimp?

Photobooth

So their argument is not only she painted the bruises on with professional make-up but THEN she also had to alter the pictures to make the bruises appear more? Make it make sense please

I hate to say that I agree, they could be cropped or something, or just opened in the software and then resaved.

she
>LITERALLY
used the default apple software.
lol
lmao

this is gay

Apple editing software

>Unironically the biggest chad in this trial,
No, The Deal Maker is the biggest chad.

What happens if a witness just takes off their pants and takes a shit or starts screaming "nigger" at the top of their lungs?

QUICK I missed the entire Dr. Curry testimony today, was she hot?

ayyyyyyyy
its afternoon recess

Attached: 1653421819349.png (373x381, 83.41K)

Unbelievably based

Attached: trd.gif (390x452, 461.43K)

It's the name of the photo editor for Apple products.

he said when someone takes a picture it would put the iphone's software version there so it had to be put through an editor to be marked like that

They weren't expecting boomers to know about photoshop.

either she is or the staffer that did it for her is

They may not understand the details but they'll get the gist that this expert is saying these photos were edited in some way.

Perv

Attached: 1554658038312.jpg (1080x1294, 641.58K)

Attached: 1625532046023.jpg (800x800, 114.12K)

Motion to say the n-word

>they didnt compare original photo with saturated one

Sleep tight Johnny

Attached: 1653426252565.png (581x501, 359.48K)

have to have an image with good color separation like that one for high piece count and hidden image to work out. cheers to the user who chose it

Contempt of court

The basic bitch photo editor for MacOS.

based & syruppilled

Imagine not stripping EXIF data before sending them out or to publications

I'm pretty sure he's not that retarded and would have checked that before literally going to court and testifying under oath

Somebody contact the team and tell them to superpose the pictures for fucks sake or to compare exifs

Attached: 1653329520448.gif (895x779, 710.07K)

proves images were edited or at least transformed

Hello

Attached: 1653414532126.webm (1918x888, 2.11M)

she just has a punchable face. i mean, how could johnny resist?

Attached: tre.png (593x516, 408.15K)

I can fix her

She dont know how to do that sweetie.

iTODDLERS ETERNALLY BTFO

Edited in Photoshop can mean anything, the photo could have been cropped, sharpened, resized. Very harmless things that do not affect the content of the photo.

I wonder if they asked this guy to look at the photos of Depp in the oriental express with a tomato red face from the added saturation.

shit talking in gamer lobbies builds character

It shows she enhanced her photos

This is why I edit all my pictures in MS Paint, nobody's ever gonna catch me sleeping

>being an itoddler
she lost before it even began

Experts are just grifters who moved from their actual work to getting money from being an "expert"

I have the other guy filtered.

Attached: 1648068565248.jpg (1024x968, 67.04K)

Question to Any Forums friends:
Is it possible to edit a photo without guys like Norbert finding out by the metadata?

Are people in Russia following this trial? Who do they support?

hahaha
what a fucking dude

make it 10 images so I can roll for my dick reaction

apply makeup, enhance photo for bruise
just enhance color, for the "swollen" face pics
now, go back to sucking dog dicks

Based rock n roll aficionado

>tried to larp as johnny by smiling and laughing with attorneys to win people over
>dead silent as her whole case falls apart from some tmz twink and a boomie.

lol

Judge gives them a medal.

next jiggers my niggers

>jigex.com/8cjsd
jigex.com/8cjsd
>jigex.com/8cjsd
jigex.com/8cjsd

Another thing Amber lied about in her testimony, so yes

Anyone got a clip of this?

yes

Did she testify it was not edited?

>narcissistic person thinks she is smarter than everyone else
who knew uh?

Any Forums strips metadata now, this was changed years ago.

thats literally his job to know about this shit

What do non American anons think about the US legal system on the basis of watching this trial?

They make him ride the Alpaca of Shame naked

gamergate chads send their regards. we gamers are finally vindicated. the vindication was televised.

Fuck shes hot

Yes? What part of that isn't believable? If she faked her bruises why do you not think she would fake the photos to make her fake bruises appear worse? Do you think a narcissistic self obsessed whore like Amber is the kind of person who would actually do serious damage to her own face?

This. She said it were diferent photos in diferent days.

Example: that absolute madlad that literally did a google search and charged 500 bucks an hour for it

pretty shit photo for a photo guru

Probably a shitstorm

Can you take a photo through the photos 3.0 app?

Good question.
I don't know.

Camille literally asked Amber if she edits her photos while having these 2 photos side by side as evidence retard

Yeah, like he said, you can just edit .exif metadata after finishing editing.

excellent pepe

>Little argumentative don't you think?
>Oh hardly I find that to be purely logical

Attached: 1644132479369.jpg (1068x601, 65.13K)

Just stripping it of any data, also exif editors

Permission granted.

Attached: maxresdefault (2).jpg (1280x720, 73.18K)

hope they will point out that the 2 pictures with ""different lighting"" are actually the same but edited

It's pretty clear that this guy's supposed to be testifying about this, but that the judge sustained the objection of Amber

Yes. Her shirt was straining to contain her tits.

This nigga clealry on adderall or cocaine

Better than mine, but obviously it varies by state

I’m assuming things look bad for JD right now considering the amount of really embarrassing trolls in here

fuckn based bros

Guys I need to shit

Heard's team can still win this. All they have to do is convince the jury that she is delusional and she actually believes her own lies. Therefore she didn't lie knowingly and isn't guilty of defamation. The seeds are already planted.

Sustained.

Attached: 1653425021771.jpg (1200x800, 54.36K)

>there is stilI a clear bruise
STFU it looks like a pimple, I have more evident random bruises just by being clumsy

i.4cdn.org/wsg/1653506187353.webm

Yeah you can just strip it. All major social media do it.
Bonus fact: Thats how the Burger King foot lettuce guy was found - Any Forums didnt remove exif data back then

well it doesnt really show that. it shows that the photos were opened in that application and most likely exported from it. but that doesnt mean it was tampered with (doubtful)

She could have just had DIO took the photo, stopped time, turned the light on then took another one. It's perfectly explainable.

>Had some work meetings- how was the TMZ shit bros?
Quick, clean and to the point.

THIS GUY FUCKS TOO

Is he spiderman? Why doesn't he slide down the tilted floor?

seems like it was a direct photo from the iphones camera itself and not a third party app

that's a lot of jiggy pieces, and big penis

>Is it possible to edit a photo without guys like Norbert finding out by the metadata?
Yes, but you have to be very careful. Even if the EXIF data is perfect, you can still apply filters to the photo to see where the corrections have been applied. Best example I can think about is Christine Blasey Ford in the sunglasses. That was an obvious photoshopped image.

id bet a million dollars that amber had no idea that taking digital photos embeds all this info

Well, your legal system is based on ours so I can verifiably say that they're both fucking shit.

It's just data, you can edit to anything you want

Can we just filter all Canadians at this point. It seems he's the only one

creepy jew

>You're here to get your 15 minutes of fame huh?
What the fuck is wrong with Elaine, anyway? She said something similar to the Soijak guy.

cont.

Thread's moving fast, and other jiggies are being made.
I'll keep it to 108 pieces for now.
Latest cityscape was a little challenging.
jigex.com/zr1SY

Attached: completed_24.png (419x792, 813.52K)

YWNBAW

Attached: 1653500310887.png (844x1022, 367.6K)

Yes you can wipe all metadata

What a desperate witness and argument. He has no evidence of editing on the actual image, he is saying these images were reproduced through other apps and using this as evidence for possibly image manipulation. This is a literal non argument and I can't believe deppheads are acting like it means anything

Edit in MSPaint, take a screenshot instead of saving, save the screenshot, strip EXIF data.

I can't believe it but I have to say Any Forums is based for once

i could die happy if this trial literally ended with her lawyers giving up and using an insanity excuse

She's a Catholic school dropout, don't expect much from her

Number fifteen....Burger King foot lettuce. The last thing youd want in your Burger King burger is someone foot fungus

Is that a criminal sentence?

Hi frens, I missed the last few days of the trial, has anything interesting happened recently?

Bro's is there still hope?
twitter.com/ThatUmbrella/status/1529543396242628608?s=20&t=5AGJawe_5OimFVGSgxPZcg

Attached: a75e02e5ec4071cc93c4cec0e51e75c4.png (471x845, 586.97K)

Says the literal only faggot simping for amber. 99% of people are on his side here and outside. You're a fucking tool if you think otherwise

ENHANCE

Why are all of Johnny's witnesses professional, handsome/beautiful, and respectful but all of Amber's witnesses are saturday morning cartoon evil and evil looking?

There method of discrediting is based on saying this. Its really underhanded.

she wants to be camille so bad

exif(metadata) is not in any way secure, it's like writing on the back of a picture.
if you wanted to mislead him intentionally it would be trivial.
that doesnt mean he cant catch whatever shooping you do.

Yes. But if you strip EXIF data, people will be suspicious. So you have to edit the EXIF data post, but forensic can tell if EXIF data has been tampered with.

>bros looks and intelligence are correlated

You must get played by a lot of downies in real life, huh?

Objection, no foundation.

So that means she committed perjury. Is Turd going to jail then?

Depends, are you gonna marry some rich slag, shit in her bed, claim domestic abuse, and edit the photos to make it look like she abused you?

I...think so? I know they can go to jail for however long the judge deems appropriate.

Sniggered!

there's no need to open the photo in an editing software, habibi - the jury now knows that the photos might have been edited, for all they know

That's what I do when I'm paranoid, I take a screenshot of the photo, print it in MSpaint and crop it a tiny bit and save it.

Nah

Depp has won. It's over tranny

That was kino

how can you try to give them the benefit of the doubt when we have a INESCAPABLE example of two photos of her face that are presented as two photos that are the exact same photo with a different filter aka EDITED

Checked and just ignore stupid shit. They do it for the attention.

Attached: CanadaNoFreeSpeech.jpg (686x604, 174.85K)

You attract what you put out

Objection; Reddit spacing

I don't know about you guys but it's starting to look bad for JD. I think AH is winning this one. There's no defense for beating a woman.

It's kind of fun to watch, ours are pretty boring other than this one most recently youtube.com/watch?v=EY3JUa_VYhY

The fact that the photos were "edited" and saved in the Photos App isn't damning at all. (It could have been zoomed in or reframed) The only thing that is problematic for AH is that she said testified the picture (which was clearly just the same picture with the saturation changed) and the other picture were two photos taken at different times of the day.

narcissists are very dumb people

That Dutch angle tells you all you need to know, bros, this dude's gonna fucking strangle somebody in the courtroom.

Celebs are above the law.

No. She is going to claim
>Her team did it
>Her lawyers did it
>I did not know
Just like how she could lie about various things and get away with it

he becomes the new judge

This is a good guy to have but it could be easily refuted by putting telling the jury that the exif data would show that even when the image is re-saved in photos without any tampering.

Attached: kyle_amber.jpg (1200x627, 130.84K)

once you enter the courtroom the judge can fuck you over pretty much as much as she wants.
as in, have fun in jail.

Was this the revenge for Gamergate?

Attached: jgdncxwfg0911.png (622x445, 58.93K)

Depp apologists are either throwing around vile, misogynistic remarks in their echo chambers or coming on this thread to troll. They have nothing of real value to discuss.

>>> DONKEYPOX???

Attached: donkeypox.png (1320x743, 570.92K)

Femcels are hot, why can't they and incels combine and fix the cel part?

Attached: 729.png (1548x1252, 1.39M)

>Care to repeat that, citizen?

Attached: 1397835568131.gif (331x240, 1.75M)

>The only thing that is problematic for AH is that she said testified the picture (which was clearly just the same picture with the saturation changed) and the other picture were two photos taken at different times of the day.

i will literally become an hero if they don't make him comment on this. although i'm sure it's the whole reason he's here

YWNBAW

Attached: dilate department.png (386x586, 213.04K)

Attached: benchewshimmy[sound=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.catbox.moe%2F76a87z.mp3].webm (300x368, 68.7K)

Pretty wacky, but I live in a third world country so it's not as wacky as ours. Would be better if people just randomly erupted into fistfights.

Lol simping so hard and can't handle the cope. Too bad you're not there to whisk ber away and save her . It's too late

>interview.johnnydepp-zone2.com/1995_02Premiere.html
>In the Mark Hotel incident, Depp deconstructed the furniture in his room at a cost of more than $9,000 and several hours in jail.
>“I thought it was funny—I have to go to jail for assaulting a picture frame or a lamp! The rags said, ‘Well, he was drunk and he was having a huge fight with his girlfriend.’
>Complete bullshit!
>But, you know, let’s say the guy over here in the bar, he’s having a hard day, man, and eventually—one more stubbing of the toe—the guy’s gotta hit something. So you punch a wall or do this and that. Fuck it, I’m normal and I want to be normal. But somehow I’m not allowed to be. Why can’t I be human? I have a lot of love inside me and a lot of anger inside as well. If I love somebody, then I’m gonna love ‘em. I

>f I’m angry and I’ve got to lash out or hit somebody, I’m going to do it and I don’t care what the repercussions are. Anger doesn’t pay rent, it’s gotta go. It’s gotta be evicted.”

it's a civil trial there is a very high chance that nothing will happen

that is correct, about the two photos
however, now there is a legitimate question about the validity of all of Amber's photos, not only the fucking obvious lie about "muh different light/different day" bullshit

Not crossing is considered a quiet admission of guilt.

so
>leave EXIF data in
>everyone can see through wich program you pulled it
>edit EXIF data out
>everyone knows something got edited in the backend

I don't even know enough about my own to compare

itoddlers btfo

Shit attracts flies

you will never be a woman
hang yourself tranny

CUTIE

>He has no evidence of editing on the actual image
It's literally shown in the data that she modified the pictures in some way with the app you trannoid retard.

I AM...THE LAW

Why do people call him a gamer and mention gamergate? Anything I missed?

LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW

Because it's all fake, this whole woman vs man thing is just inevitably going to create a bigger schism between femcels and right wing boogaloo larpers because everything has to be politicized. It's kinda sad you don't see all the showmanship and fakery as easily as someone from the outside would. Truth is, it's all bread and circus and it is designed to make right wingers feel like they're winning. Then after the trial something wild is going to happen that triggers an actual happening. Mark my words, bros.

Alternatively, just don't try to bullshit your way through a court where they might invite world renown experts to bust you in your lies.

I swear at this point there could literally be videos of Depp beating Amber with a baseball bat and fans would still think it's doctored, or that she deserved it.

Will this be braught up? She literally lied about it.

Attached: FS-SXJRXoAY8pI_.jpg (583x680, 33.12K)

Gamergate was right and correct

>don't edit the image
>nothing go wrong

if you're competent you can make it look like nothing was edited

he worked with game development or something like that.

Take your meds, schizo.

>Expert comes up
>they talk about they have 40 year experience, is a hacker and won 100 awards
>expect some 300IQ genius chad
>it's just some boomer that thinks he's the smartest shit in the world because he can right-click an image file and look at details

Attached: 1639402390473.jpg (206x231, 22.33K)

I have an android.

cont.

Urbanscape jiggy
>108 pieces
jigex.com/AWsNE

Attached: completed_25.png (1024x576, 1.43M)

Stripping exif data alone is suspicious. You should edit the exif after editing to make it look as authentic as possible. That said, even with master photo editing and editing exif there are still ways to spot or identify photo doctoring. I mean there are literally companies, jobs and govermental departments that make a job out of that.

AI is also getting pretty good at identifying those hallmarks too.

I'd be able to fix them. My dick is big enough.

>what if hitler wasnt hitler
not going to happen

>no retort
exactly, go dilate

go get some /p/ bros in this thread, we need their autistic expertise

Amberturds.... where did it all go so wrong

I mean all it really shows is that the images was saved in photos 3.0 at some point,
But since amber the retard has already put the original and an edited picture into evidence it gives this dude merit.

Attached: 1647724154063.gif (498x465, 1.51M)