Correlation may not necessarily mean causation, but there is a hell of a lot of correlation here.
Correlation may not necessarily mean causation, but there is a hell of a lot of correlation here
Other urls found in this thread:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
twitter.com
>guns in absolute numbers, not per capita
yeah, when you cant make an argument- you lie.
typical faggot.
Look at total murders vs number of guns.
fake and gay
/thread
Also OP is a faggot and this is a slide thread
I never got why people post shit like this. It's so easy to just google the statements and find out what it's saying is bullshit. Surely
>you didn't fall for it
but also
>you don't expect anyone else to
so why post it?
But sometimes
>Correlation may not necessarily mean causation
Same with this shit, which doesn't even give the source.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>Results. Gun ownership was a significant predictor of firearm homicide rates (incidence rate ratio=1.009; 95% confidence interval=1.004, 1.014). This model indicated that for each percentage point increase in gun ownership, the firearm homicide rate increased by 0.9%.
>Conclusions. We observed a robust correlation between higher levels of gun ownership and higher firearm homicide rates. Although we could not determine causation, we found that states with higher rates of gun ownership had disproportionately large numbers of deaths from firearm-related homicides.
Niggers
>more guns owned means guns are used more
Imagine my shock
You could always do something about the illegal gun running or stop your own feds from giving cartels even more.
Basically. It's obvious, but Any Forums has retards for some reason denying the obvious:
while I agree nigs and spics are more violent, this is not an argument against stricter gun laws because one can easily buy weapons in one state and go to the next one
that was the case for the one in buffallo for example
>statistics are retarded