When exactly did White People stop having babies?

When exactly did White People stop having babies?

Attached: Screenshot_2022-05-24-19-53-18-33_965bbf4d18d205f782c6b8409c5773a4.jpg (1080x721, 383.07K)

Other urls found in this thread:

justine-s-writes.medium.com/birth-strike-how-the-predecessors-of-antifa-laid-the-foundations-for-abortion-in-america-5c147c7670dd
youtube.com/watch?v=5l8uy_U8bmA
sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513817302799#:~:text=The genetic heritability of fertility,phenotypic variation attributed to genes.
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It should be a known FACT that the ideological predecessors of Antifa (anarcho-syndicalists) were the first ones to push for mass abortion and contraception as part of plan to destroy capitalism through destroying the birthrate. This call for a "birth strike" was carried over to the American communist party and the ACLU.

justine-s-writes.medium.com/birth-strike-how-the-predecessors-of-antifa-laid-the-foundations-for-abortion-in-america-5c147c7670dd
>[P]rocreation under capitalism was an abomination since it prolonged the system by creating more “wage slaves”for capitalist bosses. In their view no one should have any children under capitalism. The agenda was to have working-class women drastically reduce the number of births via contraception and abortion. The lower birthrates would dry up the pool of labor, which would then ensure imminent crisis for capitalism and imperialism. This applied the syndicalist call for a massive general strike to the realm of childbearing.

>They erroneously believed this strategy would empower working-class women and the working class as a whole. Women would supposedly be “freed” from household labor. Workers’ wages would supposedly increase as the birthrate shrunk, since the absence of a reserve army of labor would force capitalist bosses to give into workers’ demands. Deliberately reducing the population would also give workers bargaining power with the State, these anarchists alleged.

This is because the left is inherently satanic. Unlike God, Satan cannot create, he can only destroy. This causes Satan to become deeply jealous of God, and as such Satan seeks to destroy all that God has created. The left likewise cannot create, it can only destroy, and seeks to tear down and annihilate everything which Western Civilization and free markets have made.

This is precisely why communists seek to destroy the family. Leftists hate everything beautiful and fertile.
youtube.com/watch?v=5l8uy_U8bmA

Attached: birthstrik334903043.png (440x1464, 221.54K)

The day you brought dogs indoors

When women started watching TV, the TV started telling them that life is better without children and family. Then came the divorce laws, then came the birth control, then came the feminist ideology, etc., etc.

This is an underrated answer also. This, and substituting dogs as family.

After the industrial revolution, when more children stop being economically advantageous for parents.

After this economic reality gets ingrained in the middle class, it becomes part of the culture and even the wealthier, who can afford to have many babies, stop having more children than the middle class culturally conditions itself to, which translates into 1 to 3 descendants at most.

We need to develop a cultural movement around natalism, so that having more children becomes a symbol of socioeconomic status. That way, the wealthier will want to have as many children as they can, and our demographic decline will revert.

Attached: babies-per-woman-1024x645.png (1024x645, 166.99K)

When its costs 50k dollars to come home from the hospital with one.

Meanwhile the federal negro breeding program pumps niggers out for a paycheck or two

We have them responsibly.
Maybe we don't want to keep growing until we are all in pods eating bugs.
Low growth is fine. Just stop importing niggers

Three thing that must happen to get your birth rate up again: go back to God. Put the dog and cat back in their place, outside of your house to do THEIR JOBS (guardian and rat and snake killer). And delete computer, smartphone and tv.

>This, and substituting dogs as family.
This problem is particularly bad in Canada. This is because Canadian women almost exclusively fuck their dogs. Sex with human males is reserved for drunk one night stands. Dogs have been cucking us Canadian men for too long.

It's been a slow decline over the past 50 years.
50 years ago jewish feminist propaganda encouraged women to have less children or no children while non whites continued to have 5 - 10 children.
50 years later you now see whites becoming a minority while non whites increase everywhere. Particularly those under 20.

Your own chart disproves this. People were still having lots of kids even after the industrial revolution happened. The industrial revolution only had a small impact on birthrate according to your chart. What happened after 1965 to cause the big drop? It's obvious. Birth control was invented.

>1965

Attached: 1965_immigration_act.jpg (500x440, 91.77K)

When women's lib started. It's usually an unfair expectation or outright lie that you SHOULD have it all. Men and women are different and have different strengths and weaknesses. Women CAN have children and career but the over focus on life experiences and your careers is killing ehst should be the greatest undertaking most women will ever do... Having kids.

Mentally Ill trans aren't the opposite genders and then they use it as an excuse to be gay anyways. The whole "I was a man but now I'm a woman my partner too! And we're lesbians!"

I agree with you. It is a combination of factors that start with, but cannot be reducible to, the industrial revolution. It is not a one-off event that kicks in at the 1800 mark, but rather a continuous process of technological development, slowly reducing birthrates until birth control is invented, when it starts declining more precipitously.
And while birth control methods certainly enable this situation to a far greater extent than otherwise, I believe the economic factor is still the preponderant explanation for low birth rates.
The solution is to create a cultural movement around natalism, though the problem is likely going to resolve itself on its own eventually, due to the heritability of the desire to have children. Check this paper: sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513817302799#:~:text=The genetic heritability of fertility,phenotypic variation attributed to genes.

Same reason everyone else in the developed world did. There s no incentive beyond novelty to have kids and the cost is rather excessive. I get you're a shill but the lowest birthrates on earth are in east asia. In the US whites have rather high birthrates comparatively. They're even above replacement levels in many rural red states. A rare thing in much of the first world.

Responding to 379313223, deleted repply to accidentaly.

>This photo represents white supremacy.

According to today's leftist and neoliberal eugenics movement of America, aka "Diversity is our Strength".

When white women failed to be women.

WMAF is the future.

Attached: 1647353409861.jpg (698x1024, 141.48K)

Attached: 1581680903475.jpg (968x1206, 130.33K)

The whites didn't stop.

The traitors and parent haters simply are able to show their hand now. Good for them! Let them have exactly what they want, and now we can have exactly what we want

Birth control was pretty bad too. Sex is for procreation first and for partner bonding second. If you can't afford kids or the possibility then ensuring you don't need to be having sex.

1965

They didn't.

Kys.

How did you get my photo