There is no individual right to bear arms

>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed
>right of the people
>not the right of the militia, the right of the people
it does.

I am a one man organized militia you transvestite

>the militia act
Woah

the right of the people in the well-regulated militia

Nah, the big nosed homosexual british freemason who was pressured to write this amendment made it ambiguous so you don’t know if being a member of a (((regulated))) militia is obligatory or not.

>Pixar's Food

>Keeps saying well-organized
>No basis in the constitution.
The constitutional definition of well-REGULATED means to allow for the process of, for the government to not impede.
kys retard.

2.21$ what i would give

Only part of that picture that triggers me is the boy target painting his sister and her inappropriate holstering. Points for Dad putting his finger on the trigger to show that burger what's up but he needs to level his aim first.

The founding fathers argued specifically against this, literally all of them.

The fact shills decided to try and push gun control of all fucking things is amazing. Not all of you are intelligent.

THAT'S NOT WELL ORGANIZED ENOUGH
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

having guns is what makes the militia well organized, its an archaic term which means 'well trained and prepared'.

The amendment reads, in modern english: "because its important for national defense for the militia (which is all people who can fight) to know how to use a gun, everyone can have guns so they can practice with them"

The US does this instead of the mandatory conscription for training of their citizens that some countries do. Because of freedom and such.

Fuck off I'm an one man's army. Gib me a tank

>the sooner that guns are confiscated from all non-well-organized militia members, the better
>non-well-organized militia members
Just say blacks OP, its faster

Stop making sense. This is a shill thread.

You misunderstand what is being said because you lack historical context that the American people were fearful of replacing the tyranny of King George with a worse, more immediate one.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

That is, it is necessary that the United States government have a military, and that being the case, the people must also have a right to weapons of their own.

We arent the well armed militia, they are a necessary evil and the peoples being armed keeps that necessary evil in check.

This has been wilfully misinterpreted over time. Why did Jefferson not call for a ban on guns in his own time if his meaning was misconstrued?

Op is a jackass.

>The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

>he doesnt understand sentence structure
Go be retarded somewhere else.

we're in a secret militia
you're not invited
gtfo
;)

>if you're not in a well-organized militia, you don't have the right to own guns
Glownigger subversion devastated the ability to form paramilitary organizations.
Therefore, you can be a well-organized militia of one.
Get cummed on.

Attached: 1601672573250.jpg (771x1024, 48.93K)

that's not what it says. it says the right of the people without any qualifier; therefore all the people have the right to keep and bear arms.

>$2.21 gas
fine

>well-organized militia
Well regulated and in the context of the constitution means well trained.

Shall not be infringed.

SHALL

Nope, the 2nd amendment recognizes the right to bare arms AND the right to form militias... The 1st amendment recognizes many rights in 1 amendment also...

Ill rephrase the 2nd amendment to make its syntax more clear for OP, since he is a retard.

“A sun in the sky, being necessary to biological life on earth, the right of the people to keep and bear hats and sunscreen, shall not be infringed.”

The unspoken implication: a sun also poses dangers. The second amendment is implying that a government run army poses a potential threat to its own people and thats why they must be allowed to be armed.

The United States was never EVER supposed to have a permanent standing military. All citizens were supposed to guard the Republic, which is what makes it free. As long as we are under the dictatorship of the federal government and their mercenary force the entire purpose of the 2nd amendment is pointless.

If there can be an army of one, there can damn well be a militia of one.

>A well balanced breakfast, being necessary to the vitality of a healthy State, the right of the people to keep and eat all the Eggs, shall not be infringed.
who gets the eggs? the breakfast or the people?

Shhhhhhh no one cares.

People will just join their neighborhood militia to keep the guns, easy

Government unions and forced tax happened in the early 1900s... America hasn't been free since