Compared to Russia, how well do you think the American military would perform in a large scale conventional war?

Compared to Russia, how well do you think the American military would perform in a large scale conventional war?

youtu.be/L8xA0_xt1b4

Attached: 14855934_10154792107702125_3484165795771380950_o.jpg (1959x1306, 281.01K)

that guy freaking out, you need to put a bullet in his head before he gets you all killed

not too well arguably

Attached: 1650135744853.jpg (1178x660, 137.33K)

The slog of brown mystery meat would do was worse than Russian conscripts.
Of you thought Russian army hilariously failed at times, you've seen nothing unless you see these hordes of brown mutts and w*men fight anyone but goatherders in sandals

Attached: 1653341926773 (1).jpg (1572x1350, 530.83K)

Wrong. The niggers are great. Mindless killing machines.

First try to win small scale wars.

The thing is that nogs and women tend to cluster in support units. Fighting units still tend to be mostly white. But even combat units tend to waste shitloads of time on pointless BS (diversity training, area beautification)

Probably badly since the last serious war you fought was Korea, and for the last 3 decades all you did was engage in COIN and even ''streamline'' the army to engage in COIN.

Some changes were made in the past few years, but how much of it had real effects is debatable. Your upper echelons are thoroughly politicized and participate more and more in political bullshit.

Now army would probably pick up after initial reversals, USA has the materiel and manpower reserves to survive losses, but politically speaking, your population would freak out. Just look at the reaction to the implied massive Russian losses in Ukraine.
People literally think 200 or 300 blown up tanks in a full-scale war is some epic devastation.

Israelis lost ONE THOUSAND tanks in 1973, in mere 19 days of combat. Like 70% of their original tank fleet.

Don't act like support doesn't demand cognitive and professional qualities. Fighting and support are equally important.

Gulf war showed that no nation has any chance against USA into a large scale conventional war, Iraq used to be 5th largest military of the world, one military intervention of USA of 6 months and Iraq fell at the bottom of the list. USA has anything it needs
>allies
>money
>resources
>large military very well equipped with tens of thousands of fighter of airplanes, almost 1000 5th generation fighter jets, thousands of CAS scariest being AC-130 and A-10 and hundreds of combat drones
>years of war experience
USA may have some funny people but it's not a something to mess around because those funny people are manning military tech capable to take out whole armies
Small scale wars cannot be won if the locals are not supporting you, the only way is to commit massacres on them to win
>muh korea
Times changed, technology evolved you barely have any chance to survive now days

Attached: Gulf_War_Photobox.jpg (550x675, 278.75K)

>mindless GET YOU killed machines
I thought (((meme flags))) had mandatory conscription. you should know how useless they are

Logistics and support are the most important parts nowadays. Outcome is more often determined by how timely the trucks with the ordinance arrive and not how ballsy the grunt in the trench is cause he gets deleted by the landing high precision shell all the same and guess how good a supply line and communications can be built by a unit that was taught math is racist.

Gulf War proved nothing and you're falling for simplistic propaganda narrative.
Iraq certainly wasn't ''5th army of the world'', they had a lot of manpower and equipment, which is a consequence of fighting with Iran for a good decade before that, but in all aspects it was a sub-standard Arab army, technologically inferior, badly motivated, badly trained, and Iraq was an exhausted country.

First Gulf War was a very localized affair, it was fought in Kuwait and SW Iraq, and much of it was Iraqis retreating, in a fucking desert. On tactical level, they were absolutely incompetent, you had examples like an entire brigade getting routed after surprising American TF HQs, they were literally driven away by a few APCs and gunships.

Also, that was like 30 years ago.
>technology evolved
Technology evolved for everyone.
US military tech is hyped up bullshit. They don't really have some insane edge in any department. They have a sizeable, modern military, for certain, but that's it.

We're talking about land conflict. US Army virtually doesn't have any experience fighting a large scale conflict.

>Gulf war showed that no nation has any chance against USA into a large scale conventional war,
That was 30+ years ago, grandpa. The American military is not that military anymore.

Correct. And ours are overrun with diversity. It has gotten men killed, and will get a lot more killed in a real fight with a real opponent.

True. I think our supply lines will be absolutely fucked in our next major war. Supply units are usually full of niggers and mystery meat. Look up the 507th Maintenance Company to see how well those guys fight.

we already saw it with Iraq and that was orders of magnitude harder than Ukraine. it would take about a month before all major cities were taken, between 400-800 KIA, three times as many overall.
in many ways invading Ukraine would be easier as its closer to our bases of operation and the populace isn't as shifty as Arabs (for example the single biggest incident regarding Coalition KIA during OIF was a false surrender), no suicide bombers, no IEDs.

LOL take your meds

This fkng guy.
While Russia and China are swinging their dicks about their hypersonic missiles that we will have and much better versions thereof before the end of the decade, there is an array of satellite weapons that are so secret that there isn't even a viable conspiracy about them.
Literal low orbit ion cannons and the like.
Not to mention the cyber weapons we still don't even know about
>stuxnet lolololol
Uncle Sam's empire is in decline, we are losing ground every year in terms of economic dominance. But as far as delivering death anywhere in the world within 24 hours or less and now including in and from space, we will remain king for quite some time.
Even in the Ghost in the Shell Manga universe where NEO TOKYO is the new superpower because of their "Japanese Miracle" tech that can undo radiation fallout from nuclear war, the "American Empire" is still depicted as the number one military threat and power in the world, even if the continental US in that fictional world is in post nuclear war ruin.

Attached: 1643485138513.jpg (673x673, 39.05K)

I mean, you're talking about Iraqi, country which absolutely failed in 1980 against Iran in turmoil, with numbers on their side and Iran being caught with their pants down.
Iranians weren't even able to set up their logistics properly as they were developed by Americans, and they couldn't use the computer system which indexed their stocks.

Russians bumbled their invasion against an actually prepared and experienced opponent and still managed to occupy close to 30% of Ukraine despite all the losses and chaos.

This is what Iraq managed with 2:1 advantage in manpower.

I mean, context matters. British raped the shit out of African tribes, so following your logic British Army should've steamrolled Germans in 1914.

Attached: Map_of_the_frontlines_in_the_Iran-Iraq_War.jpg (1300x1591, 886.24K)

>that are so secret that there isn't even a viable conspiracy about them
No there aren't. That's not how it works in real life.
You've been brainwashed by MIC propaganda.

>5th largest military
With obsolete equipment, they did not even have S300 or BUK.

fuck off moron.
Russia has missils that can take out our sattelites. We have become slaves to GPS and our top brass spend all thier time memorizing the 27 genders.
Plus our most elite fighters were just kicked out for refusing the vax.
We are fucked.

>and that was orders of magnitude harder than Ukraine
I give up, you people know like 5% of the shit you're talking about (basically, just geography), but you're talking with so much confidence as if you spent 5 decades studying the matter.

Iraq was harder to invade than Ukraine? Ukraine, an industrialized European country, with native weapons industry, 40 million country, armed and trained by NATO for years now?

Jesus fucking Christ.

iran is notoriously hard to invade though. it would be trouble even for the usa because of all the mountains. i've been seeing your tranny flag around lately and it's always accompanied with garbage posts

I don't know what that guy is smoking. Iraq barely had a functioning military in 2003.

says the russian subhuman that shills on this board. russia is an embarrassing shit show of a country that took three months to take over a city that is mere miles away from their border. russia is a joke, you're a joke. they aren't a super power they are a pooper power with the army of shitskins

usa has taken their shit pushed in every combat exercise they've participated in
Lost every single war they've fought alone even against desert goat herders
I dunno dude you better use those nukes soon

I'd post the webm of the fat negress dancing instead of marching but couldn't find it