Why are you against regulations, Any Forums?
>Regulations are ba
compare car parking deaths vs plane starting to lift off or land deaths
should be per trip, and not per mile
Correlation is not causation. Why not include walking on that list?
I'm not. There should be more. Mostly on Leftists/Faggots
explain why a dead person is a bad thing?
explain why that person cant make their own choices and decide if they want to take that risk or not?
Aviation without regulation would be hellish.
why are burgermutts like this
That is the dumbest false equivalency ive ever seen.
because a trip on a plane is 6000 miles versus a trip on a car is far less, also most motorcycle trips are super short
Because that's not a vehicle
You never die looking like a bitch on a motorcycle.
>Airplane regulations are the same as motorcycles
White men fly planes.
Niggers ride motorcycles like niggers.
It's not the regulations.
Where are bicycles at?
Clearly, in this case motorcycles are dangerous not because of lack of regulations, but because the vehicle itself is inherently dangerous. Like hang gliding is.
>vehicle itself is inherently dangerous
Vehicles don't drive themselves into an accident,
retards do.
You are a moron if you ride a motorcycle. Your life is in the hands of millions of idiot drivers all distracted by their digital media.
>Vehicles don't drive themselves into an accident,
>retards do.
Yes, but when that retard is in a giant hummer, the vehicle protects them from their own retardation while magnifying their retard threat to everyone else.
"Only retards let themselves get merged into, hit road hazards, have animals jump in front of them, and have half the points of ground contact, just because all motorcycles are subject to a higher risk due to uncontrollable factors, doesn't mean it's a inherently dangerous vehicle"
- some furry on /pol
Most motorcyclists die due to retarded drivers not paying attention.
This is a stupid post. Regulation destroys. Sheeple gonna sheep
Motorcycles are generally dangerous BECAUSE of cars.
If someone shoots my with a gun while I’m roller skating, we don’t attribute that to roller skates.
If some fuckhead driver misses a stop sign and knocks me off my motorcycle, we chalk it up as a motorcycle death.
If you die on a motorcycle BECAUSE of a car, that should be considered a car death and evidence of cars being dangerous.
This would flip the two. Motorcyclists are sometimes entirely responsible for their own death, mostly victims of cars, and almost never responsible for killing anyone but themselves.
Its true. Plus in NJ we dont have real riders. People forget about them for 8 months and then they pop out in spring while we're doing our normal 60 in a 45 and they want to ride slow. Then they all break down on the 1st ride. Every year.. tons of riders on the side of the road at the start of the season.
>Motorcycles are generally dangerous BECAUSE of cars.
They are dangerous because they have no safety features to protect the rider.
Sit in a car and crash it into a wall at 50km.
Do the same with a motorcycle.
You have an excellent chance to walk away from the car crash with only some muscle strain. You would be lucky to live on a motorcycle.