War is meaningless and Demographics are destiny

Nothing matters other then the fact that birth rates are low in intelligent prosperous countries , the welfare states will collapse along with devolved society.
The Russo-ukraine war is a meaningless elite power struggle both Russia and Ukraine have low birth rates as well as every other white country and there seems to be nothing we can do about this, every society on the planet is living in dysgenic state with lower productivity and competency, society will collapse and collapse will be forever there will be no industrial revolution 2 because fossil fuels will not be readily available like they were the first time around.

Attached: 3964D9DC-500E-4993-850E-21864B867073.png (640x480, 46.13K)

yeah, birthrates are meaningless in the age of artifical wombs.

the only thing that matters is who controls the wombs.

Please shut the fuck up.

Attached: 1634517737429.png (1529x655, 190.6K)

monkeyfest destiny

why?
fucks up your plan of turning remaining whites into obedient breeders, doesnt it?

It's going to take many, many years, if not decades, for that technology to become viable for humans and approved by governments. Will such technology allow the west to out breed Africa? I don't see your point.

my point is that numbers are meaningless.

africa has more population than europe and usa combined.
but they are powerless at the international stage.
their numbers are actually quite problematic.

as for the "white race", what we need is quality, not quantity.
what good will it do if you pump out 12 children, but all will end up libshit footsoldiers because your wife divorced you over money?
when 1 individual ending up in a position of power would actually help change things.

Did you read the pic I provided? The population boom in Africa will result in a massive spike of both legal and illegal immigration of Africans to the west. In fact its already happening. Think about the consequences of that please.

yes.
outbreeding them is not an option.
you will never teach euros to pump and dump like niggers do.
the only practcable (and rational) response is to reach positions of power to change things at the decision-making level.

>outbreeding them is not an option.
I didn't claim it was. We have the west with a dwindling population, Africa experiencing a massive population boom, and a huge portion of those Africans desiring to move to the west. What do you think will result from that?

Only The Protocols demand that war should not result in an exchange of territory. Now that The Protocols are no longer being followed, countries are free to grab as much lebensraum as they want, and that's why Putin is the #1 bogeyman right now.

so if you know that outbreeding is not an option,
>whats left on the table?

almost 2/3rd of those african ones are adults without fully developed brains and bodies. So many people are born in africa either die from starvation or become malnutrition affected adults.

It takes a stupendious amount of farm land to just feed a family of 4.

>The population boom in Africa will result in a massive spike of both legal and illegal immigration of Africans to the west
As a deliberate matter of policy, not as a force of nature

Strong immigration controls. Repelling illegal immigrants. Stoping Mediterranean boat crossings. Will there be a will do this? Could such politics be put into place without a massive upheaval of protests/rioting? It seems to me that many in the west either won't admit that there's any issue with population replacement with Africans or would rather their society be destroyed rather than embracing policies which could be seen as "racist".

the normies dont even have the ideological tools to explain the problem adequately. tahts why they cower of fear of being singled out.

i could convince even a communist that immigration is a bad thing.
you gotta tailor your wording to the person youre conversing with

thats why nationalism is so important.
and thats why kikes try to poison the well with "white nationalism"

>inb4 civnat skom
let me explain

first, the term white.
theres no "white people" as much as there is no "black people".
if an american nigger went to africa he would get mugged.
congolese hate nigerians, nigerians hate congolese, and arabs (shoehorned into "POC") hate everyone.

its a false creation aimed at regrouping all whites on one side and all blacks on the other to make a big fight.
i can see that woth the immigrants coming from africa here.
there is a distinct change in mentalities.
as much as immigrants used to be mostly neutral, now they come with the intent of destroying europe "because white slavery". despite the fact that
-most of europe didnt engage in slavery
-it was brits, americans and frenchbois who abolished slavery.

promoting white nationalism one one hand and nigger chimpouts on another is to create a "self fulfilling prophecy".

now with white out of the way, lets concentrate on the nationalism part.

nationalism is allegiance to your country.
but if you mix race into it, no immigrant can feel allegiance to his adopted country.
the other prong of the attack is bullshit like "integration is racism", further promoting the creation of isolated, inimical groups of population within the host state.

>but niggers cull whites
yes. on the other hand quite a few niggers stand with america.
so by declaring america "white" you are disenfranchising your most powerful allies:
the people who can talk some sense into the niggers.

most do not hate you per se, its just that since their criminality has been depenalized, they follow the path of least resistance.
(cont.)

but that is not the main reason why a full on racewar is impracticable.
that reason being that the fair skinned population of america is deeply divided.
and you wont be able to win a war on two fronts, with all the might of american military against you. not gonna happen.

so what can be done?
only civic actions.
educate the people as to the real enemy.
put differences aside, and unite against the globohomo.

how it can be achieved?
with actual, traditional nationalism.
coutry first, then family, then god.

organize protests.
turn them into strikes.
and force the management to shoot the plebs.
once enough people will die
you will finally get your revolution.
commies thrown from choppers, libshits quartered on the streets.

but thats not all.
>you need leaders for the future
>and thats why quality is so important

and the fight will be fought by our generations, not the next.
on top of that, familial ties make men meek and undecided.
men with no attachments are much more willing to sacrifice than heads of families.
men without families make the best soldiers.
wasnt always the case, but it is so now.

All you have to do is export and educate people from places with higher birth rates.

I’m serious too. What’s the issue with what I suggested, besides of course the personal ones you have with it, which I understand.

You're underestimating the link between genetics and intelligence.

this phrase is so fucking gay I hate it.