I want to become smarter but I suspect this book may be liberal propaganda, albeit less so than Gun, Germs and Steel. The author is an Israeli homosexual.
Red pill me on this book
Kevin Wilson
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.org
archive.org
archive.org
archive.org
livius.org
twitter.com
Joseph Scott
It’s pretty fucking good explains how we got to where are at this point in time
Parker Hughes
>humankind
Colton Brooks
>is a book written by a homosexual Jew liberal propaganda
Precedent indicates that this very likely
Henry Ortiz
made by a gay WEF nigger kike
kike
David Ward
Your instinct is correct. All books are variation on a theme. It doesn't matter how detailed and fancy the variations are if it's a bad theme. In this case it's a materialist, neo-darwinist, evolutionist theme. I can't explain to you why that's a bad theme, you'll have to figure it out yourself.
Brody Perry
I read it in rehab because I had nothing else to do and it killed time effectively. It was not as boring as the book on US presidents I had. I remember 0 from it.
afaik guns germs steel was much more enjoyable a read
Nicholas Allen
If you want a brief history of human civilization and what become before us, rather than reading that tosh, I'd suggest
>Debt, the first 5000 years; Braeber
>Search for Indo-Europeans; JP Mallory
>Fingerprints of the Gods; Hancock (it's good, doesn't draw conclusions just states the facts)
>Lost World of Giants; John Gray
>Babylonian Atra-Hasis
Levi Gutierrez
>>Fingerprints of the Gods; Hancock (it's good, doesn't draw conclusions just states the facts)
I wish there were more books like that. Le Bon's The Crowd goes into a similar direction. IIRC he does draw some conclusions, but the majority of the book is just him stating objective observations about human behavior.
James Morales
Which would you recommend if I could only get one?
Jeremiah Anderson
If you're serious about this then follow Xi reading guideline
Zachary Scott
>if I could only get one?
You can download them all to read on the go, or tucked up in bed at night, with your nigger-cattle-tracking-good-goy-device smartphone
>Debt, the first 5000 years; Braeber
archive.org
>Search for Indo-Europeans; JP Mallory
archive.org
>Fingerprints of the Gods; Hancock
archive.org
>Lost World of Giants; John Gray
archive.org
>Babylonian Atra-Hasis
livius.org
Jacob Phillips
>i can't tell you why human inequality resultant from evolution is an inherently bad topic to discuss
because you're a leftist christcuck?
David Price
>cover quote by bill gates
I'm actually pretty curious about what the subject matter in the book could possibly be. Human evolution seems like a pretty anathematic topic for Gates and his pet leftists. Unless the gay jew is skipping past that and starting with how humans are eusocial and it is your moral obligation to care for tyrone's baby.
Xavier Lopez
>is a book
every book is literal liberal globohomo faggotry propaganda. if you ever read anything, you become brainwashed.
Ian Collins
That's unironically a good list.
Christian Robinson
>book thread
cool, can someone redpill me on lothrop stoddard?
Jace Brown
>if you ever read anything, you become brainwashed.
I know you clean toilets, but, you can treat reading like you do a shopping cart, you don't have to put everything into your trolley. You can even read material that's contrary to your own views, by being dispassionate and critical.
Camden Jones
>I suspect this book may be liberal propaganda
Its written by a gay vegan jew that hates humans. Furthermore he wants AI to rule us and dictate our lives, well for you, because he and the other 'elite' will evolve past humanity, while you and the rest of the useless eaters get put on drugs and in the metaverse. Not making this up, he is quite vocal about all this.
Ian James
>You can even read material that's contrary to your own views, by being dispassionate and critical.
lmao, literally quoting cia brainwashing guidebook.
get fucked glowie
Jason King
The first 30-40% of the book are relativelly interesting
After that you have a steep jump in propaganda, I could only do maybe 20-30 pages after that and I stopped reading around the halfway point
Lucas Long
>A book written by Klaus Schwab's right hand man who works towards feeding you bugs and gleefully announces humans will soon be completely programmable.
Nah man, I'm sure it's totally a great book that has benefited humanity.
Lucas Ross
I don't know anything about history but I think everything was going well and then the Romans figured out how to placate the population by keeping them fed and safe and conquered the world until some other group beat them or some shit. Now we are all docile slaves being controlled by whoever keeps us fed.
Justin Perez
Not everyone is equipped to handle information flow and maintain self-control, but that's just how it is. You must learn to accept this; better yet, without resorting to categorizing people as cattle and non-cattle
Luis Baker
I'm sorry, I forgot to actually comment on the book. It's written well, as in its easy to read and to take in what he says. He follows a general timeline of the history of humanity (he calls us sapiens) thats really nothing special but accurate. The subversive part is in his comments and language and the way he spins things. He keeps using female terms for EVERYTHING. And you read carefully and critically you will see none of his arguments have any real merit, but always boil down to that humans are bad.
>humans killed all the mega fauna to survive this is bad
>humans then got into agriculture this is also bad but grains are bad
He is also very dishonest in the way he treats how the human hierarchy operates, he discribes the way it is but then says its not like that because: why couldnt we be like bonobos (matriarchy). Asking a question does not disprove anything. He gives a strawman of what a freemarket is and says other things that are blatantly false. Things like 'a lot of women are stronger than a lot of men' which is completely false and goes against all data. Also says that men can get pregnant etc. Its been a while since I read it but I found it to be very subversive and then I looked up the author and I lot was made clear to me then.