They hate the Enlightenment, they hate "modernity" (whatever that is), they don't even seem to like the majority of white people, what about "the west" let alone "white people" DO they think is worth spilling blood over?
If it's a romanticised view of the middle ages where there is no hardship, everyone lives happily and you go charging into battle against the saracens , they can forget about it because it will never happen again. This will never return. The wheels of history have moved on. It doesn't seem like you want to live in the real world. They want to live in some medieval painting of a battlefield or something where some knight in shinking armor is pointing at the enemy and they're a pikeman charging them. Those may be your expectations, but pic related was the reality. You wouldn't last a week in the holy roman empire, the peasants will shit you out dead with zero warning.
I'm not exactly thrilled about "da west" either but at least I have a few gems in my life in the west. I love my wife and family, I like my neighbors, I actually get along pretty well for my co-workers, and I spent the past few days just hiking (not that I am planning on going on a mass shooting over my love for these things).
What do white supremacists even like about the west?
Other urls found in this thread:
files.catbox.moe
bitchute.com
twitter.com
They want to live inside a neoclassical painting depicting medieval chivalry that was done during the enlightment.
>inb4 nu/pol/ is not a monolith tho
stop with the cope, user -- it is.
Simple, the west is where white people are from and white people are better than everyone else. If you remove everyone who isn't white then you have the best society. It's all about homeland, nothing more nothing less
Not a white supremacist but I appreciate the lack of forced child marriages
It's evident that a form of romanticism is transversal to them because of the shit lives of the atomized capitalist corporatist subect. The romanticism, esthetic vision of the past is the core of the white supremacist theory, it is truely the rabbithole of self-powered delusional ressentiment.
Their logic literally is "Well ok, I guess (((they))) made white man weak with their burgers and their fast foods and the porn, b-but if we took power we'd rebuild the ebin Roman statues!". Basically, its just pure cope to deal with the pain that centuries of capitalism and corporatism inflicted on our cultural sensibilities. Also punching down to feel better, a lot of it in fact.
>They hate the Enlightenment, they hate "modernity" (whatever that is)
I actually do hate these things, but I'm not a white supremacist. Most white supremacists don't hate them; in the US they are usually whignats who worship the "founding fathers" and think American culture is a real thing. Reminder that the concept of race was itself invented by Enlightenment progressives.
Anyway your view of the Middle Ages is wrong and based entirely on discredited propaganda. It really was the best social structure to ever exist.
I like nothing about the West and everything about traditional Europe. (((The West))) as you said usually means enlightenment and demoncracy, and I am against it, and so should everyone on the real Right be.
Child marriages were never a thing in medieval Europe. Occasionally there would be betrothals for children among the nobility, but the actual marriage would not occur until later.
Or perhaps you're just thinking of India.
I just want the west of the 20th century
>punching down
How is it "punching down" when the state bends over backwards to accommodate non whites through affirmative action policies and censorship of any criticism towards them ? If any class is "privileged" in modern day Western society, it's clearly non whites, especially blacks and Jews