▶WARNING Be aware, any /chug/ thread that uses globohomo nuspeak wording in the OP (such as Kyiv) or cites UKROP sources (like video game footage) are fake shill threads. >By posting in these threads, you recognize Israel controls the NATO Council and you irrevocably denounce the Talmud out of your own volition
▶Latest >Erdogan: Turkey can't say yes to Finland and Sweden's NATO membership >Azov surrendering and being sent to a 3rd country: DPR >Power supply returns to Mariupol, Volnovakha and other liberated cities and villages of the DPR >Russia cuts off electricity to Finland >Lloyd Austin calls for Russia-Ukriane cease-fire in talk with Sergei Shoigu >5000 Ukrainian troops ordered from Belarus border to reinforce Severodonetsk >US Senator Rand Paul stalls $40 billion in aid to Ukraine >Russian forces entered into the town of Severodonetsk, Novokalinovo and Novobahmutovka. >Reuters: Germany's VNG will transfer payments to Gazprombank under Russia's euros for rubles scheme >The ban on the transportation of Russian oil has been excluded from the "sixth package of sanctions". >"Legendary" Canadian Sniper Wali returns to Canada, disappointed by state of the UAF >Admiral Makarov is FINE >Battle for Popasnaya results in Russia's victory >Kherson authorities announce their intention to join Russia >Russian forces capture Yampol in Donetsk Oblast >AFP: Bulgaria and the Czech Republic looking to request exception to Russian oil embargo >Pope Francis: NATO provocation may have led to Russian invasion, unsure whether countries should continue sending arms
That's the origin, yes. It's a general rule. With all the other things equal and simplified, you need 3:1 advantage to assure success, in tactical terms.
But in operational terms, you can achieve that ratio by better maneuvering and surprise. Or you don't even need it, since your troops are better. Or you just have more firepower. Or shitload of other things.
Groups of men murdering other men is a very complex affair.
