What are the tangible benefits that Finns bring into NATO...

What are the tangible benefits that Finns bring into NATO, considering all the liabilities & risks we've to shoulder if they are taken in?

Attached: there was no other way.jpg (1164x1004, 336.59K)

>strong air force
>strong ground forces
>total control over the baltic sea
>protection to Norway and the Baltics

>strong air force
>strong ground forces
rather relative when compared to other European mercenary armies, not much when weighing in against Russian arsenal.
> total control over the baltic sea
>protection to Norway and the Baltics
How do you nullify existence of Kaliningrad & Russian Baltic submarine lfeets?

The Finns are very much like the Swiss, but without the mountains. They are very much like the Swiss in that they have a lot of money, and are extremely organized and disciplined. They are also very much like the Swiss in that they have a lot of guns.

>How do you nullify existence of Russian Baltic submarine lfeets?
By blocking the entire Gulf of Finland with mines, just like in ww2
>rather relative when compared to other European mercenary armies
As much MBTs and tracked IFVs as Italy for example

makes the russians seethe. that's good enough for me

A massive land border with Russia.

> By blocking the entire Gulf of Finland with mines
and why wouldn't Russian be able to remove/defuse them?
> As much MBTs and tracked IFVs as Italy for example
You're a conscript army while we've a peace time mercenary army.
And compared to Russia, how are these going to help considering their missiles arsenals & other capabilities?

Given past performance in wars I am taking Finns over Italians anytime. There is nothing quite as self-destructive as going into war with Italians as allies. Trust me.

>and why wouldn't Russian be able to remove/defuse them?
Because they need surface ships to do that, which can easily be sunken by AShMs
>You're a conscript army while we've a peace time mercenary army.
Why have an army for peace time?
>And compared to Russia, how are these going to help considering their missiles arsenals & other capabilities?
Concidering Russias performance in Ukraine, they'll help a lot.

The Finnish military is very professional, disciplined, and effective. I don't see any downside to this alliance.

Oh and by the way, in a NATO v Russia situation Poland and Germany will steamroll over Kaliningrad

They're also very much like the Swiss that if they're attacked outside office hours, NATO will have to wait

Attached: swiss.jpg (1440x2439, 1001K)

Can we really afford not to?

Attached: 3f3fee54185d97e5057c4d6116401b9568995945dbdf170794e495d8b67b33b1_1.jpg (500x479, 54.59K)

>Weaponized autism
>fugg memes
> will beat NATO soldiers with a birk branch in a warm room
We need this

Attached: 1652508692519.png (633x625, 509.73K)

Don't they have that famous sniper, Husker Dü?

We could win Italy in a fight.
So, why not. What italy brings to NATO? Corruption.

>all the liabilities & risks we've to shoulder
Euros don't shoulder SHIT in NATO

Isn't it obvious to you?
Have you ever looked at a map?

finnish women love bbc

>We could win Italy in a fight.
This is the Weaponized autism I was talking about

Attached: 1640525496305.jpg (700x382, 36.47K)

> Because they need surface ships to do that, which can easily be sunken by AShMs
You honestly expect that Russia cannot guard its navy vassals at all? lmao
> Why have an army for peace time?
Some enforcement force has to exist.
> Concidering Russias performance in Ukraine, they'll help a lot.
> if war is not over in two weeks, it's a failure
Christ you Binns.
Rather questionable, especially now.
> We could win Italy in a fight.
How would you pull that off? lmao