What are the political implications when a city does not have enough restaurants to serve the residents of that city?
Where’s my food wagie
Other urls found in this thread:
>political implications
That actions have consequences. These shithole cities pride themselves on their rich collection of diverse restaurants founded by immigrants or whatever; they blew them all to hell over a virus that only kills fatties and old people, and now they’ll have to deal with stupid, overpaid niggers delivering whatever’s left, 30 minutes late. No refunds, learn or perish. Fuck em.
You vill slave in the gig economy
This is why we need the government to make food regulations
I love when neetcucks are forced to wagie
The same thing that happened in New Orleans.
>implying we're not living in a dystopian future where you have to be a delivery nigger
>what are the political implications
Nothing, it's just a problem.
>What are the political implications when a city does not have enough restaurants to serve the residents of that city?
That it's the responsibility of the government to provide food.
The restaurant industry is one of the largest contributors to the economy of any city. It's not a good idea to throw that out of balance.
I think this is the best way to make the world a better place.
The implication is that they need to go back.
They'll get more immigrants.
>What are the political implications when a city does not have enough restaurants to serve the residents of that city?
It's the government's responsibility to provide food.
>be NY
>"everybody wants to be here, obviously, so lets make property some of the most expensive on earth"
>pandemic starts
>shut down all businesses not run by an "essential" fortune500 company
>cause mass exodus
>"wow, so many free spaces! better charge a premium for when people come flooding back!"
>continue to hemorrhage businesses and people
>not enough businesses to sustain the people
>"this is Trump's fault"
> What are the political implications when a city does not have enough restaurants to serve the residents of that city?
I don't know, what are the political implications when a city does not have enough restaurants to serve the residents of that city?
"war zone"
Oh no, people had to have a little urgency in their work? What the fuck is with this hysterical hyperbole and Jewish histrionic bullshit. Please fix this civilization.
>What are the political implications when a city does not have enough restaurants to serve the residents of that city?
This is why you need a government.
Imagine opening your restaurant and seeing 40 orders that need to be made not counting customers that walk through the door
THIS CAN'T BE REAL!!!!!!!!1
youtube.com
The implication is that they need to go back.
Good. "People" who can't cook deserve to starve.
>t. Chef
>What are the political implications when a city does not have enough restaurants to serve the residents of that city?
This is why you need a government.
They had too much government. One retarded to lose it's shit over a boomer virus.
Imagine sitting around for 6 hours waiting on a $22 Belgian waffle from iHop.