How does political succession work in China and Russia?

We know that if Biden has a heart attack, Kamala takes over
But who takes over if Xi or Putin die of heart attack or any other illness?

Attached: Biden Xi Putin.jpg (3359x3464, 1.09M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=kO88kFvlE2k
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

We are not allowed to discuss this question.

Attached: 1648864543451.gif (498x278, 31.42K)

>asking a retarded question that could be answered with less words typed into google
>shilling Amerimutt cope and damage control

Attached: 1652908000820.jpg (259x195, 7.36K)

Trump would take over

biden is not in charge so that doesn't really apply

>But who takes over if Xi or Putin die of heart attack or any other illness?
Chink Komsomol internationalists (basically chink-jews) take over if Xi gets ousted or killed.
American assets take over Russia if Putin doesn't secure a replacement from his establishment.

Give me a serious answer, niggers

This is indeed the serious answer, you can not discuss the question. Otherwise you will be arrested.

Attached: 1648003574123.jpg (692x633, 51.61K)

But you're not even in mainland China

VPN,I'm using a VPN and I can't discuss this question.

Attached: 006SJccCly1gzf61a6sqhj302q022jr5.jpg (98x74, 1.93K)

They are whores for familes of big nosed criminals, so those psychopathic families pick a new idiot to be their puppet.

China has a vice president, just like the US. Xi was the former VP.

If Putin dies, his cronies vie for power, just like Stalin.

Despite our media's depiction of Xi, he isn't actually the sole ruler of China. Xi Jinping, alongside the Standing Politburo Committee makes the key decisions in China. The politburo members are just as competent as Xi is.

China follows a system called "democratic centralism" which was popularized by USSR. It's essentially democracy for the party and party members only. So what happens is that if Xi Jinping were to die tomorrow, the politburo would take over the operation while they prepare for a new election within the party. There are 100 million members in the CCP so pretty much all those people will vote.

The result is likely one of the politburo members becoming the new president of China.

Attached: Capture.png (765x869, 242.13K)

The CCP Politburo just votes another leader in. With Russia I think technically they're suppose to have someone fill in until the next election but who knows.

The vice president is part of the politburo, so he will likely take over alongside the other politburo while they setup a new election for a new president as described

Putin has his siloviki: youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=kO88kFvlE2k
If he dies any one of his cronies can take his place

Xi Jinping is of the CCCP, the party can easily replace him, the way they did with Deng Xiaopeng and Hu Jintao

If Putin died, he would have been replaced by a successor who is not an oligarch.

If Xi died, he would have been replaced by a successor who is not an oligarch.

If Biden died, the next VP would take over.

Then why is the system so shit? Is the criteria to be a member something shady? Are the candidates pre-selected by the commie "red monarchy"?

The party.

whether or not the system is shit is heavily debatable. China consistently elects really efficient and talented leadership

The criteria for becoming a member is to pass an exam and provide resume with references. It's easier to think of the CCP as like a corporation. Some corporations require you to do tests in order to get in. Likewise the CCP requires people applying to pass an exam in basic Language, Math, Logic, and Socialist theories.

For the record, CCP members have a turnover rate of like 60% whereas US senate have a turnover rate of 10%. So even if you get into the party, it just gets difficult from there

It's not, most of its decisions are retarded jewish nonsense.
The only achievement they had was the economy growing very fast, at the cost of everything else.

The whole thing sounds extremely suspicious.

To enter the central committee, you need to have a long record of excellence. Starting off at a lowly position in the countryside, and working yourself up to governor of a major city or province, etc...

It is a highly meritocratic system, but on the other hand, it is also heavily favor practicality and utilitarianism, which can lead to rather unsympathetic and authoritarian decisions, where you sacrifice the rights of a few for the benefit of the greater society. IE, trampling the property rights of the NIMBY type to build their national rail network.