Why make extraordinary claims, but only give us videos that show nothing?
Why are they bamboozling us?
Joseph Parker
Luis Parker
Rare
Luis Wright
>Why are they bamboozling us?
Because you're stupid and it's funny.
Kevin Miller
It looked like it moved with the gimble
Henry Jenkins
Yeah I'm thinking those videos were either fake or just of something normal sped up or at a weird angle or something. In interviews with the military pilots they said they see these things all the time. So they see them all the time but they only have three abysmal quality videos that go for a few seconds. They should get a few of their planes and cover them with cameras and sensors to get better footage, they have enough money and it doesn't make sense that they don't
Camden Wright
Psy-Op. Pretend it's aliums while working on super advanced military tech.
Ayden Edwards
>look at that blurry image
>ah im loooooking
>its totally a ufo
>its just a hoax to syphon billions of dollars
Lucas Clark
>but only give us videos that show nothing?
don't look at what is there, look at what is not there.
>No visible propulsion system
>No exhaust trail
>No aerodynamics
>No sound ( engine, sonic boom )
>No signs of friction ( heat, noise )
>No inertia
Yet it is still flying and manoeuvring around at high speed, ignoring everything we expect by our current technologcial understanding.
Nathan Taylor
Because UFO fags are gullible and are getting shafted by conmen like Jeremy Corbell who are milking UFOs. Americans are fucking dumb and love magical stories about aliens, angels, ghosts, etc.
Grayson Collins
I watched the AATIP and DOD reps speaking with the senators regarding UAPs. Some highlights:
>of the several UAP encounters investigated, some may be sensor malfunction or optical phenomena, but some of them are definitely physical tangible objects
>no collisions with the UAPs, but 11 near misses recorded
>no wreckage has been encountered, nor would they know where to look
>it is confirmed the US has never discharged any weapons against them
>the US has never attempted to comunicate with the UAPs nor do they know how they would even do that
>besides never colliding with one, never shooting one and never finding wreckage, they are certain some of the UAPs are tangible objects and they have data regarding some physical characteristics
>when asked what equipment is used to probe the events, they answered "everything at our disposal"
>when asked which instruments specifically produced UAP related data, the DOD rep said he'd only answer in private because it is classified due to national security concerns - meaning military technology they aren't sure Russia/China even possess
>when asked whether the US has underwater sensors to detect UAPs because many of the reports speak of the UFOs going into or out of the ocean, the replied this is classified and can only answer in private
Conclusion: UFOs are probably real, not extraterrestrial at all but its a toss up between another superpower or an unknown breakaway civilization, the UFOs buzz in and around the ocean (and the navy spots them a lot more than the USAF), possibly hinting at underwater technology (convenient as its the only place on Earth where a civilization could thrive and never be detected by humans), the US military apparently has some new generation radar/sensor to detect sea and air craft that operates in different ways (maybe neutrino imaging instead of radiation on radar)
Austin Parker
It's not a physical object. It's a new radar and camera spoofing tech. Basically plasma laser pointer to confuse enemies.
Anthony Bennett
jews need distraction like air
Nicholas Adams
I dare you to whip out your phone and record a shooting star to see how easy it is to get a faraway aerial object that only lasts a few seconds and shows up randomly, on camera
Austin Wright
>Because UFO fags are gullible
Bong believes he is alone in the universe because some sandnigger told him so.
Josiah Richardson
Who has the Laneyball version of this? I need it
David Edwards
>>No visible propulsion system
OK I'll give you that
>>No exhaust trail
Fine
>>No aerodynamics
It's oval and balloon-like
>>No sound ( engine, sonic boom )
The video does not record external sound, so you cannot prove or deduce that the object generates no sound
>>No signs of friction ( heat, noise )
The object is black and the lower bottom text indicates FLIR is in black hot mode
>>No inertia
The video is tightly zoomed in, and the object exhibits only attitudinal change rather than directional change.
Juan Rogers
>Bong believes he is alone in the universe because some sandnigger told him so.
memeflaggot believes there are aliens, despite NO HARD EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN FOUND YET, because Papa Zondo and other shills told him so.
Look retard, we haven't even found microbes or bacteria anywhere in space...
Mason Moore
>Videotapes
>Multiple Eyewitness accounts
>Radar data
>"No hard evidence"
KYS
Jeremiah Sanders
Levi Anderson
Bentley Phillips
Ethan Richardson
It's a cover up, it's another blue book to discredit UFOs and not reveal anything because "we did look up and there's nothing to be worried about lol nothing to see here folks".
As someone said, the direct evidence is pathetic but the indirect evidence is insane.
Zachary Murphy
Dominic Phillips
Jaxon Miller
>>Videotapes
Not of the near-infinite acceleration or the "ping-pong ball" movement
>>Multiple Eyewitness accounts
all on DoD payroll
>>Radar data
never released, only talked about by those on DoD payroll
>>"No hard evidence"
exactly