Why do some people on here insist on giving credit to the government (feds/glowniggers/mossad/whatever) for every major...

Why do some people on here insist on giving credit to the government (feds/glowniggers/mossad/whatever) for every major shooting?

Attached: 1652316920553.png (2012x864, 1.29M)

For all the stuff we dont know you do so it evens out

they know about (((them)))

>The government keeps murdering civilians
>The only way to stop them is by voting in the elections they host

The philosophy of nu-Any Forums in a nutshell.

Attached: 1564972583092.png (831x799, 229.05K)

Because without mass shootings, the FBI would be disbanded and the CIA would all hang from ropes.

The NSA is a different monster but that's besides the point

the default assumption for nationally covered "terrorist" attacks should be that the government did it.
They should be considered guilty until proven innocent.

This is a natural defense against a tyrannical government that has power over the media.

Why shouldn’t we?

lefties like to spam post it whenever they are losing

Because it benefits the most.

nu/pol/ is unironically dumber than r*ddit

The government isn't all-powerful and the media cares about profit. Both are made up of people who cannot keep secrets and have a vested interest in keeping society stable.

There is literally no reason for them to make up attacks when plenty of people here and from around the world are going to do them anyway without any government assistance.

The reason they cover these stories is to demonize the people who commit them, sell clickbait articles, moralize, and to present themselves as the supreme authority.

Sometimes If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, its just a duck.

>Why do some people on here insist on giving credit to the government (feds/glowniggers/mossad/whatever) for every major shooting?
BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN PROVEN 100 TIMES OVER THE FBI IS 100% CORRUPT FROM TOP DOWN TO THE JANITOR.

It’s not every major shooting. Just the ones that appear in national news with the talking heads preprepared with talking points. 20 people got shot in Milwaukee the night before, and a whole church got shot up in California a few hours after Buffalo. Weird that those aren’t news.

Attached: 0CB84FC4-1806-4E16-9B10-C30F0869B55B.gif (480x270, 2.03M)

No one died in either of those shootings except for the 1 guy in California.

I don’t get it
I’m glad he shot up a bunch of niggers and wrote memes on his rifle, that shit was funny as fuck.

Attached: BA78EDE9-9593-4D07-A09C-4320021BF89E.jpg (1054x1040, 155.96K)

>The government isn't all-powerful and the media cares about profit. Both are made up of people who cannot keep secrets and have a vested interest in keeping society stable.
True but they have a lot more power than the average person. And working together they can do more than you think.

Look at how they coordinate to manipulate public opinion on undeniable facts like great replacement.
They do have incentives to lie about certain things and to craft stories in a certain way.
They are self interested and very powerful.

>There is literally no reason for them to make up attacks when plenty of people here and from around the world are going to do them anyway without any government assistance.
Look up the case of gretchen whitmer's kidnapping. It's been proven in court that feds basically did the whole thing. They tried to pin it on two retarded patsies... and obviously this sort of big coverage political action was done to sway the election results.

You're just naive on what's going on. You aren't clued in to the real game being played.

Attached: 1624891037644.png (586x476, 292.43K)

We do that because we have brains and we pay attention instead of furiously masturbating to tranny frog porn as you do.

What I'm saying is government involvement in acts of random violence is the exception and not the rule.

Stuff like the michigan governor plot happen because the FBI wants to break up potential terrorist cells by entrapping them. And to my point about government ineptitude they couldn't even get that right since 2 of the people involved were acquitted on all charges. And in lone wolf cases like Buffalo they might be on the radar but they don't have the resources to follow up on every potential schizo which is why the kid was able to actually to act out their shooting plot.

Frogposter = jewish idiot.

>What I'm saying is government involvement in acts of random violence is the exception and not the rule.
There's no such thing as a random act of violence. That's a propaganda term. People commit violence for reasons every time.

>Stuff like the michigan governor plot happen because the FBI wants to break up potential terrorist cells by entrapping them.
That's just a narrative. We've seen a number of cases in the recent past where our intelligence agencies have been politically active. Those people have political agendas... and they illegally pursue them. Look at the steele dossier. You're willingly ignorant again.

>And in lone wolf cases like Buffalo they might be on the radar but they don't have the resources to follow up on every potential schizo which is why the kid was able to actually to act out their shooting plot.
To what degree did they push the kid to carry it out? You don't know. Neither do I. Probably they actually had a hand in it... it's a question of how big of a hand. You are choosing to assume their innocence when you have no reason to do so.

The default assumption should be FBI involvement because they have the means, motive, and opportunity to have been involved.

>There's no such thing as a random act of violence. That's a propaganda term. People commit violence for reasons every time.

Just call it violence then, or violence committed on a mass scale.

>The default assumption should be FBI involvement because they have the means, motive, and opportunity to have been involved.

You're giving way too much credit to these people and are willingly ignorant to an individual's ability to commit mass atrocities.

It's incoherent to suggest that literally anything that doesn't happen or almost happens or does happen is the work of a secret government agency.

You basically can just blame everything on some mysterious group of government agents without ever having to think deeply and realistically about why these things actually happen.

>It's incoherent to suggest that literally anything that doesn't happen or almost happens or does happen is the work of a secret government agency.
>You basically can just blame everything on some mysterious group of government agents without ever having to think deeply and realistically about why these things actually happen.
No I'm saying it should be the default hypothesis.
As the evidence comes in, we can modify our opinion and decide what the truth is.

But in the absence of clear info, the assumption should be that feds are behind it.

The reason to it that way is because the cost of being wrong is much lower if it's a random crazy nutcase.

Whereas if it's the government trying to fuck with you, the cost of being wrong is quite high

The glownigger meme is perpetuated ironically by glowniggers. It is the perfect vehicle to spread the idea of the all seeing government pulling the strings behind every major event. It keeps people feeling powerless in the face of supposedly omnipotent enemy.