Why do conservatives want "free speech"

pic rel falls under free speech and is allowed on youtube. censorship is based.

Attached: challenged.png (857x728, 822.96K)

Nobody on earth actually believes in freedom of speech

I agree user, censorship is based. We should limit the awful degenerate hate speech we are seeing on places like Twitter. Transphobia and homophobia have no place in 2022

>be OP
>post your own video for views
Sad

I was pro freedom of speech but with all this leftist degeneracy being spread all over social media, mainstream media, hollywood, entertainment, etc. I lean towards censorship, but only censorship of leftists. If leftism didnt exist, pretty much every american would support freedom of speech.

Correct. Commies and mudsharks should also get socially ostracized and excommunicated.

The important thing is for accepted speech to be decided by the majority rather than some elite minority in power -- whether that be political leaders, monarchs, or tech billionaires.

Marxists and jews can't handle free speech because they're criminal scum

Attached: 1652642170816.jpg (1024x1024, 149.87K)

Many such cases, unfortunately

thanks i've never seen any woman or man cum that hard ever. i didn't even know that was possible

It's urine. She's pissing everywhere.

They don't. It's what they virtue signal about, but when push comes to shove, I'm confident they'll clamp down like they did here.

She(?) Has one strong vagina lol

She also shit out a dildo. Butt plugs should have bases to them so they don't get stuck up there.

No, she shit out TWO DILDOS.

Attached: 1652820546361.jpg (1650x1650, 252.3K)

Did not know American's cared about the Ontario Election Debate.

>some kind of plug in her snatch
>dildo in her snatch
>dildo rammed right up her ass
>massager on her clit
the lengths women have to go to get off is hilarious

That certainly looks like a lot of preparation, but the payoff was worth it lmao

>no woman will ever do this while sitting on your face
we were put on this earth to suffer

how can anybody believe in (((female orgasm))) its obvious these attention whores are all faking it

Under the Miller test (which takes its name from Miller v. California (1973)), speech is unprotected if "the average person, applying contemporary community standards,[23] would find that the [subject or work in question], taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest", "the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law" and "the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value".[24] Some subsidiary components of this rule may permit private possession of obscene materials at one's home.[25] Additionally, the phrase "appeals to the prurient interest" is limited to appeals to a "shameful or morbid interest in sex".[26][27]

The Court has also held that a person may only be punished if he knows the actual "contents of the material".[28] In Smith v. California (1959), the Supreme Court thus gave a defense of "reasonable ignorance" to an obscenity charge. The rationale for this exception is that justices have believed that obscenity has a "tendency to exert a corrupting and debasing impact leading to antisocial behavior".[29][30]

I do but I think it only works in small scale enthostates.