Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

Attached: wut.png (493x763, 698.43K)

Based tummy hammock working overtime

Attached: ezgif-3-d1a043fa44.jpg (1920x1080, 263.94K)

she's obese & has a manface, which is objectively ugly in a woman

The idiot jap that impregnated a overweight dutch woman who gave birth to that thing

authoritarians could put her on a diet and make her beautiful

Attached: man in the high castle - nazi ss flicking cigarette.gif (500x279, 1.6M)

Nobody was in the wrong. He talked shit and people talked shit back. Simple as

Attached: 1649623320528.png (433x571, 330.52K)

Push her back in.

Peterson is wrong. She's pretty and of healthy weight. She's close to perfect.

I would say she's slightly overweight but I would still eat her shit. Gay niggas would disagree

Fucking fat girls is good for the upper body skrempf. You virgins don't know about TnA. No offense.

Attached: TNA.png (599x603, 54.89K)

She's obese. No debate.
If you like that, fine.... But it's not healthy, nor attractive.

I don't get why he bothers with Twitter.
Does he really not understand what kind of place it is?

Anyway, the fact that it's magazine cover of an almost nude woman is in itself disgusting. It's not a celebration of beauty, it's a celebration of sexual decadence.

reminder that you can fuck that fat off of fat girls

Her for being a faceless mutt.

I can't argue with you, she might be chubby but I'd too eat her shit straight out of her ass.

Healthy & Attractive.

niggers and jews

Attached: 11D66D4A-3011-4DFD-AC4A-2A38FC16111B.jpg (1698x2500, 509.17K)

This

>BRO DIS YOU HEAR WHAT SOME GUY SAID ON TWITTER OMG OMG
Gossiping like children

This. When they have to wear something to cover their fupa they don't belong on the cover.

This bitch ugly bro

He took a three week break, came back and said it makes him a worse person but still posts.

Just like every other e-celeb I suppose

She's a slam piggy but he's also right.