Although the synoptic gospels generally include the same stories about Jesus, they all portrayed Jesus to match the demographic they were preaching to. Matthew’s Gospel includes the genealogy of Jesus to show that he is a descendant from Abraham but Luke and Mark never mention this. Luke and Mark also correlated their gospels in order for it to relate to the audience they were trying to teach. This in my opinion makes the authenticity and legitimacy of Jesus less appealing. Matthew was considered to be the most Hebrew out of all 3 gospel writers (Where he was raised and lived was populated mainly by Hebrews) therefore it’s only normal that his gospel portrayed Jesus as THE descendant of Abraham since he had to cater his teachings towards an extreme Hebrew audience.
>guys guess what, jesus is the messiah >he comes from a lineage of all these important and influential hebrew men >It all started from abraham!!! >Look!! I wrote the whole geneology down for you with no evidence whatsoever!!! >jesus fulfills the abrahamic promise that you have been hearing about and prayed for!!!! >accept him as the king of the jews because of his bloodline!!!! >muh teachings
luke mentions it but focuses more on how jesus was as a man on earth BUT matthew emphasis the geneology to show how jesus is the messiah. Luke was speaking to a gentile audience while matthew was speaking to a hebrew audience…therefore matthew emphasized the geneology to paint jesus as the messiah while luke had no use in doing so.
Daniel Richardson
>Luke doesnt mention it >ok Luke mentions it, but You will go to hell forever and ever
John Bennett
>t.memeflag gay
Nolan Phillips
Seethe
Christian Martinez
> (OP) # >>IMO Christ isn't legitimate >Fuck you kike
Whites are the true Israelites. I wrote a 430 page book with 785 sources that irrefutably and conclusively proves that 9/11 was an inside job, the Bible is supernaturally authored, and the jews of today are not the Biblical Israelites, white people are.
Given that Biblical prophecy places us currently in the end times, this is all conducted by the Synagogue of Satan, prophesied to exist in Revelation. This cabal acts as an international criminal syndicate, loosely based around freemasonry and luciferianism. They facilitated 9/11 as a complex money laundering operation, in order to conceal a massive amount of real-wealth that was looted from the world through planned and intentionally created World Wars, and used in the form of fraudulent security bonds to collapse the USSR. I prove that Lusitania and Pearl Harbor were conspiracies and false flags similar to 9/11.
The Bible was supernaturally authored, and I prove it through several ways, such as historically fulfilled prophecy, Equidistant Letter Spacing codes placed within the text, and knowledge present that is thousands of years ahead of its time, only possible through divine intervention.
You simplify a very complicated thing. Matthew never read Luke and Luke never read Matthew. They both likely read Mark and they both likely had another source in common, as well as seperate sources. Like you say Luke was not written solely to a jewish audience, why would it be strange that he doesn't emphasize the genealogy? Also him living in the area increases the chances by a lot that he was from that genealogy. It is actually kind of a weird point to get stuck on...
Aaron Stewart
Matthew is for Jews Mark is for Romans Luke for Greeks and John was special
