Why hasn't Russia killed this guy yet?

Killing the popular president of a country you say isn't a real country would be a pretty decent morale victory I would have thought? At least worth the cost of authorizing the op if you know where he is.

this is the correct answer
however, they should STILL nuke him in his current location

He is jewish and they rarely engage in friendly fire or snitch each other.
This combined with the dumb normies licking their balls resulted in the invincible arab caliphate they have today.

Because he’s strong and heroic. The entire world is behind Zelenskyy which is why Ukraine will win.

Sure, but taking out the head of the command structure of the enemy surely has value in a wartime situation? Otherwise, why did the mutts bother looking for Saddam?

Zelensky isn't the true leader of Ukraine.

He is part of the script.

lmfao he is not in command of anything, he doesn't have the requisite background or experience to command an army

he is the PR guy. He tells a bunch of lies, western country civilians eat it up, are happy with it and get bored thinking that everything is OK. If he were to die then people might start clamoring for more action than pretending to send 40 gorillion weapons, which rus doesn't want

why did we hear about this plan before the current events? shoulda been some greentext user warning us about it

As others have told you, life is not a capeshit movie. The guy is protected by a brigade worth of troops and residing in secure location.

Yeah, as in he's not "commanding" any armies any more than a US President would in wartime, but he is still the Head of State, he would have a say in terms of strategic aims and the pace of peace negotiations. He's also the face of the holol side - take him out and it's a crushing morale blow. It would also send a clear signal to the decision makers that come afterwards that you can get any of them any time you want.

>>do they have the capability?
They don't have the capability to take a city 30 km into enemy territory.
What makes you think they can remove a head of state that's been preparing for this scenario for 8 years?

Why would you want to kill the head of the country that supplies you with oil?

>he is the PR guy
Hey, some countries have PR guys as presidents, others have actors and TV personalities.

RARE
A
R
E

taking out other countries' leaders is very rare in this day and age, even if they are on opposing sides. Do it and the opposing side will take yours out in return. Yes it's hard because of security, bunkers etc., but if you took out theirs then they will have the determination to keep trying. Moreover your leader now knows there is a target on his back, and cannot lead effectively because he has to fear for his life at every moment. He would never sign off on something like that. The only time it happens (i.e. Saddam) is when you can be sure the opposing country lacks the resources to try, which they did because half the world was arrayed against them and they were alone. This is obv not the case here

If they kill him, who will sign the surrender agreement?
He is not controlling this war in any way. NATO Commanders speak directly to Ukie armies and militias.

Sweden is the most Marvel country when you really think about it

Attached: 1647655841935.webm (587x300, 241.72K)

>do they have the capability?
No
>do they have the willingness?
Debatable
>are they afraid that doing so will create more problems than it would solve?
Probably