This is political because intelligence is political especially with certain "therapies" that have been consumed by large amounts of people recently.
So a group of friends and I were debating about whether or not you can really gauge someone's intelligence according to IQ systems if their scores across VCI PRI PSI and WMI are not all roughly equal. This led to GATE threads and then to how anything can affect someones daily mental capability to the looming unknown of how certain things may be affecting a big chunk of the population directly since they may no longer even qualify as human in the way we do.
If you have a GAI of 130 for example, which would reflect a "true IQ" of 130 for someone with ADHD or focus problems, but my memory and processing speed scores are so bad it brings your FSIQ down to 110 or something, which one is reflective of true/peak intelligence and which one accurately depicts my average level of functioning? It's generally accepted that GAI represents the persons actual IQ if they have severe focusing issues, and GAI is basically FSIQ without the timed and memory tests, but FSIQ shows the negative impact the memory and focus debuff has on the person. So obviously, we aren't at our peak mental performance 24/7 nor our worst, and GAI would represent our peak performance in that it's disregarding poor performance that drags your score down. What then would be an accurate measure of someone's intelligence without disregarding the debuff? Is the person who can't focus and has horrible working/short term memory but capable of processing complex concepts and otherwise mingling with the 130-140IQ person on the same level as those people, or are they on the level of a 110-120IQ person who they'd be in the same standard deviation with if you consider their FSIQ to be truly/more reflective of a measure their actual ability?
You can't ignore shit like focus and memory when considering someone's overall intellectual capability but how do you then determine the average level of intellect someone is operating off if there's conditions where things can vary so much and it becomes a matter of which zone of operation you're functioning in most of the time? The 80% that you have a goldfish memory or the 20% that it's more on par with your other strengths? When do they touch, where and how and what would the number be?
>Now consider, thanks to certain "therapies" potentially hundreds of millions or more have consumed could be altering their intellect in a variety of ways >If ADHD can fracture our ability to measure people with IQ, what about graphene brains? What could the consequences to many systems of biology and science we have be now that we have graphene heads in key industries all over the world? >We are in the Post Transhumanist era of known human history now. Particularly the part where only the guys underground have any idea how this affects how we function as humans. >Car crashes, plane crashes, everything is up as a result of brains failing in unpredictable ways now >Known, "normal" conditions like attention deficits already proved most the systems we use to evaluate cognition very fragile, with this unknown on the horizon what could happen?
Discuss the implications. This was already a concern as far back as when they started banning IQ testing niggers and how that poisoned the well.
boxing it into global IQ scale if the person defies categorization OP has a point that vax heads, if their brains are being melted, could create both an entirely new species of unintelligent humans and we may have to invent totally new systems to gauge them because they defy the systems made with natural humans I guess we should stop treating them as functioning naturally?
Eli Russell
unless you meant the ADHD part, I'm curious about that too. Idk
