The U.S. conquered a nation on the opposite side of the planet in a month

Why can't Russia conquer a nation directly on their border?

Attached: ebdfff3812b0d01c11e05b67a5aa2a57 (1).jpg (730x600, 80.57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ZVTwU42onxU
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

4 reasons
1) Russians are alcoholic apes with a rusty army with a few very good elements and a lot of cannon fodder
2) Iraqis were (and are) inbred retards with a rusty army strained by Pre-existing conflicts
3) Mutts bombed the shit out of Iraq for a month before proceeding with the invasion
4) Mutts had half of the world backing them both economically, politically and militarily including having access to bases in Saudi Arabia, Russgols have the entire western world against them provind Ukraine with cash, weapons, Intel etc.

I'm curious to see how russhit VPNiggers are gonna defend this one

Attached: Z.png (594x600, 229.63K)

The contingent of people loyal to Saddam was about 40,000
Iraqi tanks were faulty and unattended
Huge shortage of specialists and pilots and military equipment parts

This shit is getting too meta for my likings lmao

>Iraqi tanks were faulty and unattended
>Huge shortage of specialists and pilots and military equipment parts
So, like Russia?

Russia has missiles and air defense

afghanistan?

Russians are just larping retards with delusions of granduer. They put more effort into impressing literal nobodies and niggers in africa with prestige projects than actually achieving real things for their society. Our western capitalist societies beat them without even trying.

Attached: 1652266258770.webm (460x252, 566.79K)

Also TIGERS and S P A C E