He wrote the only manifesto worth reading in history.
He wrote the only manifesto worth reading in history
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
And it's really fucking long, anyone got a link to current guys manifesto and/or the video? I was in Michigan camping yesterday
Tarrant was good too. His copycat not so much
reminder he wanted to transition
>He wrote the only manifesto worth reading in history.
Current year... I am forgotten.
He's a piece of shit. Some of his victims survived, I think one became blind.
It’s only 60 pages long you soda brained autist
xt=urn:btih:7355B71CB5EE536BBF365113BAF6D25322D0B2E5&dn=Buffalo%20Shooter.torrent&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.opentrackr.org%3a1337%2fannounce
Is it working?
Never 5get saint Harris
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:174D41859E815EB0F5CCBC2C8A17C1972D29372B&dn=Buffalo%20Shooter
this is the real URL for the torrent file
I didn't say I didn't read it faggot
Based
I just wish he didn't go full schizo mode and start attacking society. He could have built on his manifesto by doing something positive or at least worthwhile.
>LE TECHNOLOGY BAD
>LE NATURE GOOD
wow, so inspiring and deep
any hippie from the 60's could have told you that
>Write a book that is so bad that you have to use literal bomb threats to get people to read it.
Maybe he should have worked on his writing, you know become a better writer whos works people want to read and talk about? But lazy hacks never want to put the work in to improve themselves.
youtu.be
THE NATURE OF FREEDOM
93. We are going to argue that industrial-technological society cannot be reformed in such a way as to prevent it from progressively narrowing the sphere of human freedom. But because "freedom" is a word that can be interpreted in many ways, we must first make clear what kind of freedom we are concerned with.
94. By "freedom" we mean the opportunity to go through the power process, with real goals not the artificial goals of surrogate activities, and without interference, manipulation or supervision from anyone, especially from any large organization. Freedom means being in control (either as an individual or as a member of a SMALL group) of the life-and-death issues of one's existence; food, clothing, shelter and defense against whatever threats there may be in one's environment. Freedom means having power; not the power to control other people but the power to control the circumstances of one's own life. One does not have freedom if anyone else (especially a large organization) has power over one, no matter how benevolently, tolerantly and permissively that power may be exercised. It is important not to confuse freedom with mere permissiveness (see paragraph 72).
youtu.be
THE POWER PROCESS
33. Human beings have a need (probably based in biology) for something that we will call the "power process." This is closely related to the need for power (which is widely recognized) but is not quite the same thing. The power process has four elements. The three most clear-cut of these we call goal, effort and attainment of goal. (Everyone needs to have goals whose attainment requires effort, and needs to succeed in attaining at least some of his goals.) The fourth element is more difficult to define and may not be necessary for everyone. We call it autonomy and will discuss it later (paragraphs 42-44).
youtu.be
44. But for most people it is through the power process-having a goal, making an AUTONOMOUS effort and attaining t the goal-that self-esteem, self-confidence and a sense of power are acquired. When one does not have adequate opportunity to go throughout the power process the consequences are (depending on the individual and on the way the power process is disrupted) boredom, demoralization, low self-esteem, inferiority feelings, defeatism, depression, anxiety, guilt, frustration, hostility, spouse or child abuse, insatiable hedonism, abnormal sexual behavior, sleep disorders, eating disorders, etc. [6]
youtu.be
6. (Paragraph 44) Some of the symptoms listed are similar to those shown by caged animals.
To explain how these symptoms arise from deprivation with respect to the power process:
Common-sense understanding of human nature tells one that lack of goals whose attainment requires effort leads to boredom and that boredom, long continued, often leads eventually to depression. Failure to obtain goals leads to frustration and lowering of self-esteem. Frustration leads to anger, anger to aggression, often in the form of spouse or child abuse. It has been shown that long-continued frustration commonly leads to depression and that depression tends to cause guilt, sleep disorders, eating disorders and bad feelings about oneself. Those who are tending toward depression seek pleasure as an antidote; hence insatiable hedonism and excessive sex, with perversions as a means of getting new kicks. Boredom too tends to cause excessive pleasure-seeking since, lacking other goals, people often use pleasure as a goal. See accompanying diagram. The foregoing is a simplification. Reality is more complex, and of course deprivation with respect to the power process is not the ONLY cause of the symptoms described. By the way, when we mention depression we do not necessarily mean depression that is severe enough to be treated by a psychiatrist. Often only mild forms of depression are involved. And when we speak of goals we do not necessarily mean long-term, thought out goals. For many or most people through much of human history, the goals of a hand-to-mouth existence (merely providing oneself and one's family with food from day to day) have been quite sufficient.
No, you should also read the communist manifesto to understand it's retarded.
youtube.com
43. It is true that some individuals seem to have little need for autonomy. Either their drive for power is weak or they satisfy it by identifying themselves with some powerful organization to which they belong. And then there are unthinking, animal types who seem to be satisfied with a purely physical sense of power(the good combat soldier, who gets his sense of power by developing fighting skills that he is quite content to use in blind obedience to his superiors).
>whos
>whos
>who's = who is
Whose, faggot.
Suicide Note by Micheal Heisman