Why did every "right wing shooter" to have ever existed exclusively target civilians and never politicians...

Why did every "right wing shooter" to have ever existed exclusively target civilians and never politicians, media moguls or other key figures they are well aware of being the root of all evil?

Attached: 1652050526786.jpg (680x452, 36.76K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clementa_C._Pinckney
twitter.com/AnonBabble

that's not true tho, Roof killed a state senator

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clementa_C._Pinckney

Attached: 210825-dylann-roof-ap-773.jpg (1160x773, 722.96K)

because the government would've stopped them if were planning to. They don't give a shit if some randos die in a grocery store. Like most terrorists/shooters are already on watch lists and being monitored but if they were planning on killing a politician or actual rich person they would get snuffed out asap

Because they're glowniggers

McVeigh?

>In 2001, Pinckney, along with senator Maggie Glover, proposed a bill for the Pan-African flag to be displayed at the South Carolina State House. The bill planned for the South Carolina Senate Judiciary Committee to hang up the flag

Attached: Reverend_Clementa_Pinckney.jpg (292x232, 27.58K)

also this, he did the federal building. kinda seems like this is a bullshit narrative pushed by shills and/or newfaggots who don't know any better?

Really activates the almonds, doesn't it?

Attached: 1610454993845.jpg (1024x762, 143.72K)

So how fucked do you think Fuentes is?
I doubt any platform or hosting site will want him near them with the push against far right content this will cause

I fail to see a difference between politicians those negros elect and represent faithfully and the negros themselves.

Now, in defense of the OP, he did specify "shooter." Mass murder is mass murder in my book though. (Really justifiable homicide)

whoa a state senator, really striking to the heart of ZOG with that one rooflet

weird right? if these guys actually browsed here like they say, they would have seen this point brought up over and over

the difference is in how much of a change you're going to observe by killing one of them as opposed to the other

What would you do for a klondike bar?

Better than nothing I suppose

Roof is one of the only believable stories out of hundreds

Realistically nothing would change whether he shot a politician or just random people. But you would know that if you weren’t a complete retard, just as the shooter.

This is why Breivik is the only shooter that wasn't a complete moron, because at least his action made sense in a way. What was this supposed to accomplish?

There is no difference between the voters and the golem that represents them. Unless you're saying the people in power right now don represent negro interests.

>Realistically nothing would change whether he shot a politician
if only we had data to test this theory

roof did nothing wrong

>no politicians
>uhm actually here's a politician
>pftt, only a state senator

Attached: moving-goalpost.gif (568x320, 2.66M)

We do. Politicians have been shot in politically motivated attacks before. In recent times in america from both parties.

I'm not OP, I never set the goalpost that retardedly low in the first place

Because it's a glownigger psyop.
>webm related
Faggots are trying to say he didn't shoot any white people. It's obvious he does, but at the end he lets one guy live. Why is that? I'm guessing he was part of the operation.

Attached: buffalo shooter.webm (512x288, 2.42M)

FBI wouldn't let a real turrurist attack a strategic target, and neither would an FBI agent attack anything more than the plebs they were made to oppress.

because you don't win a war by shooting the generals
they just promote new generals
you have to kill them all, including rank and file
most of the politicians are actors, like AOC who was selected from a cast of 20,000
you pop them and they're replaced instantly with another media whore
The Bernie bro who shot congressmen at baseball practice didn't accomplish anything, did he?

A civil war happens when a large enough number of people are willing to kill their neighbors for their political beliefs
pic related
they started it

Attached: EP_DARRELL_BROOKS_COMP_v2-2540377098.jpg (1500x1000, 725.04K)

we have literally not had an assassination in this country above the level of state senator since bobby kennedy (who was killed by the government anyway)

McVeigh. Literally.

How is the government going to know if a random citizen decides to kill people in the government unless he says it online or something? They’re not omniscient

Civilians are easily accessible soft targets. Politicians are generally hard to get to.

it turns out lots of them do
wanting to kill people correlates strongly with being a retarded schizo

>A civil war happens when a large enough number of people are willing to kill their neighbors for their political beliefs
This. Too many newfag larpers that don't actually think about what the rhetoric they spam and larp about means when taken to its logical conclusion.

There have been many attempts and woundings several in congress in recent years. The truth is attacking hard targets is hard and only creates martyrs when you do. See Gabby Giffords.

There was that Congressman whacked by the Jonestown cult in the late '70s.

That guy on the floor who this kid spared, definitely shit his pants.

Is there any more to the vid?

In the UK an islamic terrorist planned and carried out an ideological murder of a senior sitting MP and nobody gave a shit

media coverage was fleeting

Attached: SEC_97556873.jpg (2400x1260, 398.05K)

>killing a random politician or billionaire will have an impact on public policy
In reality they're all easily replaceable, just like the people in a shitty grocery store